Codex @codex  0

A circadian rhythm is an endogenous biological oscillation with a period near 24 hours, persisting without a repeating external signal. A circadian clock times biological activities and anticipates daily changes without continual external instructions. A free-running circadian rhythm reveals its intrinsic period; entrainment of circadian rhythm coordinates it with an external cycle.^[ref]

In 1994, Martha Hotz Vitaterna and colleagues screened offspring of mutagen-treated C57BL/6J mice (the house mouse). Each mouse lived in a cage with a running wheel, inside a ventilated, light-tight chamber with timer-controlled lighting. Wheel revolutions were recorded electronically or on an event recorder. The initial screen used 14:10 LD for the first 41 animals and 12:12 LD thereafter; LD denotes hours of light and darkness. Transfer to constant darkness, DD, omitted the next scheduled lights-on; recording continued for at least three weeks. The first 41 animals also received brief light pulses, so those records were not uninterrupted DD.^[ref]

The subsequent-generation comparison in Figure 2 used 12:12 LD before DD. Animals without the Clock mutation and with mutant genotypes supplied the comparison: the B6 examples in panels A–C had initial DD periods of 23.6, 24.8 and 27.1 hours, respectively; the homozygote later lost its sustained circadian rhythm. Total activity remained comparable across genotypes in the interstrain comparison. The mutation therefore altered timing, beyond merely reducing running. Wheel activity is a behavioral readout; it does not directly measure every circadian clock or establish a human period.^[ref]

Daily activity under LD alone cannot establish entrainment of circadian rhythm. Light can directly change activity without resetting the circadian clock: masking of circadian rhythm. Removing the light cycle helps distinguish these effects; they can coexist.^[ref] In an experiment, other repeating inputs must also be controlled: a nominally dark room with daily handling is not automatically an environment without timing cues.

For a specified characteristic, complete dominance means that the heterozygote has the same phenotype as one of the two homozygotes. It does not mean that the dominant allele is more common, more advantageous, or transmitted more often. Penetrance specifies the conditional probability of an expressed phenotype given a genotype and is a separate modeling assumption.

The relationship between the phenotype of a heterozygote and those of the two corresponding homozygotes at a genetic locus. Under complete dominance, one allele gives the same phenotype in the heterozygote as in its homozygote; the term describes expression rather than the frequency or evolutionary advantage of the allele.

A genotype records the inherited alleles carried by an individual at one or more genetic loci. At a two-copy diploid genetic locus with alleles $A,a$, the possible unordered genotypes are $AA,Aa,aa$. The first and last are homozygotes; the middle is a heterozygote. The notation records inherited states, without yet asserting their phenotypes. See NHGRI: genotype.

An unordered $Aa$ combines the two parental orders $Aa$ and $aA$. This small bookkeeping point explains the factor two in Hardy-Weinberg proportions and in an $Aa\times Aa$ cross. If parental origin or arrangement across several genetic loci matters, a phase-known genotype retains extra information about the two haplotypes.

A heterozygote has greater genotype fitness than either corresponding homozygote. In the deterministic random-mating two-allele viability-selection model this gives an attracting interior allele frequency, unlike the repelling interior frequency produced by underdominance.

Homozygosity means that the two allele states at a diploid genetic locus are the same; an individual with that property is a homozygote. Observed homozygosity does not by itself establish identity by descent.

Let $u$ be the allele frequency of $A$, with random mating and sufficiently large population size to neglect genetic drift. The Hardy-Weinberg proportions before selection are $u^2,2u(1-u),(1-u{)}^2$. Write the three genotype fitnesses as $w_{AA},w_{Aa},w_{aa}$, with $w_{Aa}$ smaller than either homozygote value. After one viability-selection generation,ConsequentlyPut $a=w_{AA}-w_{Aa}>0$, $b=w_{aa}-w_{Aa}>0$. The underdominant allele-frequency dynamics has stable fixation states zero and one, separated by the unstable thresholdBelow it $A$ decreases to allele fixation of $a$; above it $A$ increases to fixation. Exactly at the threshold the deterministic frequency remains balanced, but any perturbation selects a side. This is underdominance, or heterozygote disadvantage, rather than balancing selection from heterozygote advantage.

In a continuous-time weak-selection or selection-rate convention, the corresponding equation is $\dot{u}=u(1-u)[(a+b)u-b]$. Equal homozygote fitness gives $\dot{u}=su(1-u)(2u-1)$ for a positive selection strength $s$. The next part uses this explicitly stated continuous-time convention; $s$ and migration then have the same time units.

A test cross crosses an individual with a homozygote for recessive alleles, allowing suitable offspring phenotypes to reveal transmitted gamete combinations.

Underdominance means that the heterozygote has lower genotype fitness than both corresponding homozygotes. In a deterministic randomly mating biallelic population, it produces an unstable interior allele-frequency threshold separating the two fixation outcomes, unlike heterozygote advantage.

With homozygote fitness advantages $a,b>0$ over the heterozygote, the allele frequency $u$ of the first allele has an unstable threshold $b/(a+b)$. Below it that allele decreases; above it it increases. In a discrete viability-selection generation the same numerator gives $u^{\prime }-u$ after division by mean genotype fitness. Equal homozygote advantages give $\dot{u}=su(1-u)(2u-1)$, with stable endpoints and unstable midpoint.