Here write for the buoyancy perturbation about the resting constant- stratification; the total buoyancy also includes its background gradient . Use kinematic perturbation pressure . The weak-forcing Linearized Boussinesq equations are
Weakness means that perturbation advection is small compared with the retained linear terms. With the specified streamfunction convention, the transverse vorticity is
Differentiate the horizontal momentum equation in and subtract the derivative of vertical momentum. The pressure derivatives cancel, giving
The second equation uses and is the forced internal-wave equation.
For free waves at frequency , the internal gravity wave dispersion relation gives . Thus the horizontal response scale is much larger than the vertical scale. Vertical acceleration is small in the vertical momentum equation, leaving the hydrostatic approximation . Correspondingly the transverse vorticity is predominantly : neglect relative to in the inertial vorticity term. The restoring term must still be retained, since it balances the small time derivatives.
For put , and interpret physical fields as real parts. The reduced equation is
One can solve it while obtaining the buoyancy simultaneously. Define and . The first-order hydrostatic equations become
Hence and obey
Apply the method of characteristics with zero fields in the past. With
the solution is . Consequently the hydrostatic response to a localized horizontal force is
These are exactly the required two characteristic integrals, derived with their relative sign fixed by the buoyancy equation. Quiet-past initial conditions exclude additional freely propagating solutions.
For the consistency check, set , so both integrals run over the fixed range . Differentiation at fixed now gives
This change of variable is important: it includes the time dependence of both the sampled forcing and the moving integration geometry without omitting a term. Each straight path intersects for a time interval of length at most . If , then
The characteristic size of the hydrostatic buoyancy and pressure-gradient balance is , as follows from the analogous bound on in its integral formula. Thus the omitted acceleration has relative scale at most a constant times
Together with the low-frequency assumption, this verifies the requested hydrostatic consistency. It is a comparison of characteristic magnitudes, rather than division by a buoyancy value at a node where both terms may vanish. The capital here is the buoyancy frequency, as printed in the PDF.
For , only contributes. If , every point lies outside the source interval, so both integrals vanish:
This finite propagation cone belongs to the reduced hydrostatic wave equation.
The hypotheses do not require an even forcing, so no single symmetric graph follows for every permitted . For an illustrative smooth even nonnegative profile, is even and is odd. At late time and fixed , if , then
Thus the streamfunction develops a broad nearly level interior response with outgoing fronts, while the buoyancy changes sign across the source and approaches opposite interior plateaus to its left and right. Both vanish beyond the fronts. For , a vertical phase with gives real fields and . The figure plots those profiles up to positive normalization factors, for an even compact forcing increasing slowly from zero.
Figure 1.
Causal streamfunction and buoyancy profiles for a slowly established even localized horizontal force
. Details.