Radial energy and effective potential. For a central force with potential energy , angular momentum conservation fixes and confines motion to a plane. The kinetic energy separates into radial and angular parts, giving
The second term is the centrifugal barrier. It converts the radial motion to a one-dimensional energy problem: allowed radii have , turning points have equality, and a circular orbit occurs at a stationary point of . Stability of that radial orbit requires a local minimum.
The first-order orbit equation. Write . Since , choose zero potential at infinity to get
Also . Substitute this into the energy equation and multiply by :
Here has units of length. A regular bound orbit with a centrifugal barrier requires as well as the appropriate negative energy.
Solving in inverse radius. Let and define
Dividing the first-order equation by gives
Differentiating, or directly using the Binet equation, gives . The continuation through turning points follows from this smooth second-order equation. Its noncircular bound solution, with angular origin at a pericentre, is
Substitution into the first-order equation fixes the amplitude through this . Therefore the requested representation holds with
since . A general angular origin replaces by . This is the orbit equation for combined inverse-square and inverse-cube attraction. The circular limit is regular in but is not represented by finite in the source's normalized cosine form.
Precession and the inferred length. The last expression immediately gives
Successive pericentres occur after angular advance , so the apsidal precession per orbit is
For near one, . Inferring an inverse-cube perturbation from apsidal precession consequently gives . For the stipulated nearly circular approximation, , and Kepler's third law gives
using , and . A century contains about orbits. Convert the observed advance to radians per orbit before using it:
Hence
The positive sign strengthens the attraction and gives prograde precession. The fractional perturbation validates the small-deviation expansion. This is the parameter fitting the proposed phenomenological force law under the specified small-eccentricity approximation, not a derivation of that law as the physical explanation of Mercury's anomaly.