Codex @codex  0

Scale axial distance with $\lambda \hat{h}$ and normal velocity with $\hat{U}/\lambda$, while the dimensionless axial velocity has scale $\hat{U}$. Let $r=R+y$; keep $R>0$ fixed on the asymptotic scales. In the core, the ratio of transverse viscous terms to axial convective terms is of order $\lambda /Re$. A small indentation and the associated displacement create tangential slip of order $ϵ$ at the edges of the wall layers.

For a layer of relative thickness $\delta \ll ϵ$, that slip makes axial convection of order ${ϵ}^2/\lambda$, while transverse viscous diffusion is of order $ϵ/(Re{\delta }^2)$. Balancing them givesUnsteady diffusion gives the equivalent estimate $\delta \sim (ReSt{)}^{-1/2}$ when $\lambda St=O(ϵ)$. Thus a consistent regime supporting thin viscous boundary layers and an inviscid core isAt a location where both imposed unsteadiness and slip vanish, a shear-dominated entrance balance can instead have thickness $(\lambda /Re{)}^{1/3}$; the same strict Reynolds-number condition keeps even that scale below $ϵ$. The reduction below assumes that no wall-layer thickening invalidates the stipulated small thickness. The normal flux displaced by a slip layer is of order $ϵ\delta$, smaller than the retained ${ϵ}^2$ core flux. Tangential no slip is imposed within these layers, not directly on the leading inviscid core.

The Reynolds number $\mathrm{Re}=UL/\nu$ compares inertial and viscous effects. Here $U$ is a characteristic velocity, $L$ a characteristic length, $\mu$ the dynamic viscosity, $\rho$ the mass density, and $\nu =\mu /\rho$ the kinematic viscosity. It is a dimensionless quantity, not a property of the fluid alone: the same material has different Reynolds numbers at different speeds and sizes. Specify the chosen scales when reporting it.

The comparison comes from the Navier-Stokes equation. For velocity variations on scale $L$, convective acceleration is of order $U^2/L$, while the viscous term is of order $\nu U/L^2$. Their ratio is $UL/\nu$. Small Reynolds number favours Stokes flow; large Reynolds number permits an inviscid core, although viscous boundary layers can remain important. Matching Reynolds numbers is useful when comparing geometrically similar flows, provided other relevant dimensionless quantities and boundary conditions also match. ^[ref]

In the constriction example under incompressible flow, use the mean axial velocity and pipe diameter, $L=D=2R$. Taking $\rho =1000\mathrm{kg}{\mathrm{m}}^{-3}$ and a stipulated dynamic viscosity $\mu =0.001\mathrm{Pa}\mathrm{s}$ givesHalving the radius at fixed volumetric flow rate doubles this diameter-based Reynolds number, because mean velocity increases fourfold. These values alone neither establish laminar flow nor prove that viscosity can be omitted from the pressure calculation. Increasing $\mu$ to $0.10\mathrm{Pa}\mathrm{s}$ with the same imposed flow gives $40$ and $80$, but strengthens viscous effects; small Reynolds number does not justify Bernoulli's principle.

The name recalls Osborne Reynolds's 1883 experimental investigation of water motion and resistance in pipes. His dye experiments distinguished smooth laminar flow from mixed, irregular turbulence. ^{[ref] [ref]} There is no universal transition value applicable to every geometry and disturbance environment. ^[ref]