First the eigenvalues of Hecke operators are real. Here is the needed Petersson inner product argument: unfold the finite coset sum defining into its correspondence domain, then change variables by each matrix. The determinant-normalized slash action preserves in the paired integrand, and transfers a representative to its inverse. Multiplying that inverse by the positive scalar gives its adjugate without changing the slash action. Adjugation reverses the integer determinant- correspondence, so the resulting sum is again . Consequently . Taking proves reality of , since .
Fix one prime and set and . The Hecke multiplication relations proved in (a) give , and . The distinct-root assumption excludes .
If , write , . Solving the linear recurrence gives . If is rational, infinitely many satisfy , hence . If it is irrational, density of the corresponding irrational rotation gives infinitely many in the open arc where .
If , let be the real roots of , choosing . Then . Its even-index terms are positive and tend to infinity, whether is positive or negative. Thus the prime-power coefficients of a level-one eigenform are often large and positive, and in either case
Take the separate oscillator energies
They depend on disjoint canonical coordinate pairs, so
Thus they are first integrals in involution. Their differentials
are nonzero precisely when and have disjoint supports. Hence they are functionally independent on the specified open set.
To understand all further global integrals of motion, use the actions
Direct differentiation gives , so these are action-angle variables with
When is irrational, every orbit is dense in its fixed-action two-dimensional flat torus. One elementary proof samples the orbit at times : the first angle returns, and the second undergoes an irrational rotation. These samples are dense in the second circle. Allowing a fixed additional time supplies any desired first angle, proving density in the whole flat torus.
A continuous, globally defined integral of motion must have the same value on an orbit and its closure. Therefore it is constant on every fixed-action flat torus. A such integral has the form , with , by evaluating at a fixed choice of angles. Hence
It cannot be independent of . This proves there are at most two globally independent differentiable integrals. If a third global integral were independent at a point on an excluded coordinate plane, independence would persist in a neighbourhood and hence at nearby points of the regular open set, again a contradiction.
The word global matters: on an angular chart, is a local integral of motion independent of the actions. It is not single-valued on the flat torus when the frequency ratio is irrational. Thus the assertion would be false for arbitrary local, rather than global, integrals.
Fix a real angle fraction , and repeatedly multiply by in the circle group. The generated cyclic subgroup is . Equivalently, the angle fractions are the fractional parts of , with one full turn identified with zero.
If is a rational number in lowest terms, with and coprime, then and no smaller positive power is . Hence is a finite cyclic group of order , consisting of equally spaced points. For , the successive angle fractions, starting at , are
The subgroup is finite, so it is a closed subgroup of the circle group; it is also a discrete subgroup. It is not an open subgroup, since every ambient neighbourhood of any of its points contains an arc, rather than only these seven points.
If is an irrational number, no nonzero integer satisfies , so the powers never repeat. The stronger statement is that is a dense set in the circle group: every nonempty open arc contains a power . Thus its closure is all of , while itself is a countable proper subgroup and is not a closed subgroup or a discrete subgroup. See irrational rotation and everywhere interval frequency under an irrational rotation for the corresponding motion and its long-term frequencies.
For , direct computation of the fractional parts of gives, to six decimal places,
For example, and . These calculations specify exactly which points the diagram displays.
Figure 1.
Seven repeating rational-rotation points and the first eight and sixty-four irrational-rotation points
. Labels give the power index ; the points are . The first panel uses , and the other two use . Each finite sample is only an illustration: a finite plot cannot establish that the infinite subgroup is a dense set. Reproduce the diagram with rational-versus-irrational-rotations.py. Details.
This example shows why algebraic generation and closure must be distinguished: one irrational rotation generates a countable cyclic subgroup, yet its closure is the whole uncountable compact group.