Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2003 iii Paper 13 1 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Put , with a prime number, and . The printed bound needs a size qualification: for , and , all three singletons satisfy the intersection restriction, whereas . The intended nontrivial prime-power modular intersection bound holds when ; without that qualification the universally valid conclusion isWhen this follows simply by counting all -sets. We prove the sharper intended form for .
Choose an integer with and define the integer-valued polynomialFor its top argument is nonnegative. The bottom argument has all its first base- digits equal to . The Lucas theorem therefore givesFor every , consider on the Boolean hypercube. Its multilinear reduction on the Boolean cube has degree at most and integer coefficients: the coefficient of a square-free monomial is an alternating sum of its integer values on Boolean vertices. This observation permits reduction modulo even though the ordinary power-basis coefficients of need not have denominators prime to .
At the characteristic vectors of sets , these reduced polynomials have evaluation matrix equal to the identity modulo . Hence their evaluation functions are linearly independent over . To count the available functions, let have rows indexed by subsets with , columns indexed by all -sets , and entries . Over the rational numbers, for ,Thus the matrix rank over the rational numbers is at most . Every larger integer minor is zero and remains zero modulo , so the same rank bound holds over . This low-degree evaluation rank on a uniform layer proves
For the applications alternative, take a prime number , set , , and let be the modular intersection graph on all -subsets of , joining distinct sets when their intersection has size . An independent set avoids the only possible off-diagonal intersection congruent to modulo , so
First embed as in Euclidean space. The Euclidean distance satisfiesso distance one corresponds exactly to an edge of . Every colour class in a proper graph colouring is an independent set, giving the lower bound on the chromatic number of Euclidean spaceThe Stirling formula gives , where is the binary entropy function. Here the ratio is and , so this is an exponential lower bound along these dimensions.
Second set and represent by the off-diagonal entries , , of the symmetric matrix . This is an injective representation: equality of the matrices would give , and the minus sign would require . The common diagonal can be omitted without changing distances. The Frobenius inner product gives the quadratic sign-vector diameter formulaThe term inside the square is congruent to modulo , and its smallest possible absolute value is one, attained exactly at . Such pairs exist. Consequently the diameter pairs of this finite set in dimension are precisely the edges of . Every part of strictly smaller diameter is an independent set and has at most points. The required number of parts is at least the same exponential ratio, which exceeds for sufficiently large primes. Thus bounded sets need not admit a partition into sets of smaller diameter: this supplies a Kahn-Kalai counterexample to the Borsuk conjecture. Both applications use the prime case of the proved prime-power result.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2004 iii Paper 13 5 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
The Frankl-Wilson theorem is a striking example of the polynomial method in combinatorics: an intersection restriction creates a family of linearly independent low-degree polynomials, whose dimension bounds the set family. Let be a prime number, let have elements, and let be a set family such that member sizes modulo avoid while every distinct pair has intersection size in modulo . Its general modular form givesIf all members have the same size and , the uniform refinement gives .
For the proof, work over the finite field and associate to the modular intersection polynomialAt the characteristic vector of a set , this equals zero for and is nonzero for . A linear relation among the evaluation functions therefore has every coefficient zero. The multilinear reduction on the Boolean cube, replacing by for , preserves these evaluations and the degree bound . There are possible square-free monomials, proving the general form.
For uniform members, the low-degree evaluation rank on a uniform layer supplies the sharper dimension bound. To verify this without division modulo , form the integer incidence matrix with rows indexed by subsets of size at most , columns indexed by -subsets , and entries . Over the rational numbers, a row with is times the sum of all size- rows containing . Its matrix rank is at most . Every larger integer minor is consequently zero and remains zero modulo , giving the same bound over . The nonzero diagonal evaluation matrix of the then forces .
The theorem, proved by Frankl and Wilson in 1981, extends the theme of the Ray-Chaudhuri–Wilson theorem from ordinary intersection sizes to residues. Modular restrictions can be weaker than exact intersection restrictions yet still force unexpectedly small families. Here are three consequences from one explicit modular intersection graph.
Take , , and let the vertices be all -subsets of , with an edge exactly when the intersection has size . An independent set avoids the only possible off-diagonal intersection congruent to modulo , so applying the Frankl-Wilson theorem with givesA clique has one exact intersection size. Apply the uniform theorem modulo a prime larger than , with , to get . Since there are vertices, this gives the explicit asymmetric Ramsey number bound . It illustrates how algebraic constructions produce graphs with simultaneously restricted cliques and independent sets.
For a geometric application, map each vertex to in . Then , so edges have unit Euclidean distance. Every proper colouring of Euclidean space therefore colours this finite graph, givingThe Stirling formula gives the ratio as , where is the binary entropy function in natural-log units. The positive constant proves an exponential chromatic number of Euclidean space lower bound along these dimensions.
Finally, a quadratic embedding converts this same forbidden intersection into a forbidden diameter pair. Set and . The quadratic sign-vector diameter formula follows from the Frobenius inner product:For distinct members the smallest possible absolute inner product is one, attained exactly when the intersection is . Thus maximum-distance pairs are exactly edges of . The matrices have common diagonal; using their off-diagonal coordinates, multiplied by , realizes them isometrically in dimensions. They are distinct because equal outer products require , and complements have size , not .
Any subset of smaller diameter contains at most points, so a partition into smaller-diameter pieces needs at least pieces. For sufficiently large primes this exceeds , disproving the Borsuk conjecture. This is the mechanism behind the Kahn-Kalai counterexample to the Borsuk conjecture: the number of required pieces grows exponentially in the original set-system parameter while dimension grows quadratically. Their 1993 paper establishes the resulting high-dimensional counterexample.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 iii Paper 12 4 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
The uniform modular Frankl-Wilson theorem states the following. Let be prime, let have size , and let be a rank- family on , with . Assume and for every distinct . ThenThe restrictions concern distinct pairs; the diagonal size residue is explicitly excluded from .
For each member , over form the intersection polynomialAt the characteristic vector , its value vanishes when and is nonzero when . Thus these functions are linearly independent on the whole rank- layer: evaluate any linear relation at each family member in turn. Replacing every positive power of by preserves all Boolean evaluations, so the functions are restrictions of multilinear polynomials of degree at most .
We need the sharp low-degree evaluation rank on a uniform layer, not the larger whole-cube dimension . Let be the integer incidence matrix with rows indexed by subsets of size at most , columns by rank- sets , and entries . Over the rationals, if , thenThis coefficient counts the possible inside each containing column set and is positive because . Consequently the degree- rows span all rows over , giving rank at most . Every larger square minor is therefore the integer zero. Reducing those minors modulo shows the rank over is also at most . This transfer avoids dividing by a binomial coefficient that might vanish modulo . The independent functions lie in this row space, so their number is at most its rank. This proves the theorem in full.
For the requested forbidden-intersection application, split into sets containing coordinate one and sets avoiding it. In the first part, delete one. Distinct original sets have intersection size between one and , excluding . Their reduced intersections therefore lie between zero and , excluding , so their residues belong to . The reduced set size is , whose residue is . Frankl-Wilson on the ground set of size bounds this part by .
For the avoiding part, first complement every set. The complements contain one, retain size , and satisfyDelete one and apply the same argument. The complement splitting for forbidden midpoint intersections yields the stronger boundThe split is essential: a family may contain complementary pairs with intersection zero, preventing direct use of on the original layer.
The Borsuk conjecture asserted that a bounded subset of of positive diameter can be partitioned into subsets of strictly smaller diameter. Here is the Kahn-Kalai counterexample to the Borsuk conjecture, implemented by balanced cut vectors. For each , define whose coordinate indexed by an unordered pair is one when exactly one endpoint lies in , and zero otherwise. Complementary sets give the same cut. Choose the representative with , obtaining exactlydistinct points: a cut determines its two parts, and fixing the side containing one removes its only ambiguity. Every cut has occupied coordinates, so all points lie in the affine hyperplane with coordinate sum . Its dimension isWe can identify this hyperplane isometrically with ; no claim of full affine span is needed.
For two side sets with , their symmetric difference has points. The two cuts disagree exactly on pairs with one endpoint in that symmetric difference, giving the balanced cut-vector distance formulaThe diameter is , attained exactly when ; such pairs exist even among representatives containing one. Thus a smaller-diameter part contains no pair with side intersection . Since all representative sets already contain one, deleting that common coordinate and applying the preceding Frankl-Wilson argument bounds each part by . There is no extra factor two at this step. This is the cut construction described in the original Kahn-Kalai paper; the distance and part-size calculations above give the required justification directly.
An explicit choice is . The point set lies in dimensionThe exact counts areTheir ratio requires at least smaller-diameter parts, exceeding . In particular,Rescaling the point set to diameter one changes none of these partition counts. Therefore the Borsuk counterexample in dimension 1325 is fully explicit. This is a concrete dimension, not a claim that it is the smallest possible counterexample dimension.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2025 iii Paper 109 4 iii Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-25
The Borsuk conjecture asserted that every bounded subset of of positive diameter can be partitioned into subsets of strictly smaller diameter. We construct a Kahn-Kalai counterexample to the Borsuk conjecture.
For every -subset of , let be on and outside it, and defineBecause , retain one representative of each complementary pair. The resulting set has points. For ,andAll have the same norm, so their distance is largest exactly when this inner product is smallest, namely when .
Every smaller-diameter part of therefore corresponds to a family with no pair having intersection . Part ii bounds such a part by . Any smaller-diameter partition consequently needs at leastparts. By Stirling formula, this ratio grows like up to a polynomial factor, whereas . For every sufficiently large prime , the required number of parts exceeds , disproving the conjecture.