For , and , set , . The differential operators are and . Applying them twice givesTheir sum is the Laplacian in polar coordinates. The first-derivative terms come from differentiating the coordinate coefficients, as required for second derivatives under a two-variable coordinate change. The origin is excluded from the coordinate formulas, even when the underlying Cartesian function is smooth there.
Laplacian Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-18
The Laplacian takes the divergence of a scalar field's gradient. For a real-valued function on an open region of Euclidean space, with continuous partial derivatives through order two, its expression in a Cartesian coordinate system isThus the Laplacian, also called the Laplace operator, adds the coordinate second derivatives; equivalently it is the matrix trace of the Hessian matrix. Its output is another scalar field.[ref]
The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Volume II by Richard Feynman and others. Volume II, §2–7, equations 2.52–2.54: divergence of a gradient and the Cartesian Laplacian
Three original examples distinguish shape from this sum. The bowl has . The saddle instead has : opposite second derivatives cancel. It is a harmonic function, although its graph of a function is not a plane. For the Gaussian function , with , differentiation givesIts Laplacian is negative inside the circle of radius one, zero on that circle, and positive outside it. The Gaussian function itself is positive throughout: its value and its Laplacian describe different properties.
The sum does not favor a particular orientation. Under a change of Cartesian coordinate system represented by an orthogonal matrix , the Hessian matrix becomes . The cyclic property of the trace and preserve its matrix trace. This makes the Laplacian useful when the behavior depends on spatial differences equally in every direction, rather than on the arbitrary choice of axes.
For a vector field, the Euclidean Laplacian acts separately on components expressed in a fixed Cartesian coordinate system. Components in a position-dependent basis require differentiating that basis too; applying a scalar formula separately to polar components omits those terms.[ref]
The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Volume II by Richard Feynman and others. Volume II, component formula following equation 2.54 and final paragraph of §2–8: fixed rectangular components
The scalar formula in Laplacian in polar coordinates is valid away from ; smoothness at the origin must be handled in coordinates that remain regular there. Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 iii Paper 20 1 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Use the nonnegative Laplacian convention and on the unit sphere. In polar coordinates the Euclidean Riemannian metric is , its volume form is , and therefore the Laplacian in polar coordinates isConsequently the required restriction identity isFor the opposite sign convention all eigenvalues below change sign, and the restriction identity changes accordingly.
Let be the vector space of degree- homogeneous polynomials in variables, and let be its subspace of harmonic polynomials. Write for . Substitution in the Laplacian identity givesThus each restricted harmonic polynomial is a spherical harmonic with eigenvalue .
To count these spherical harmonics, give polynomials the Fischer inner product . Multiplication by is adjoint to , so multiplication by is adjoint to the ordinary signed Laplacian . In these finite-dimensional inner product spaces, the orthogonal complement of is exactly . Hence the Fischer decomposition isMultiplication by is injective, while restriction of a homogeneous polynomial to the sphere is injective: homogeneity recovers its value at every nonzero point. Counting monomials now gives the eigenvalue multiplicitywhere the second term is zero for .
It remains to establish that these are all the eigenvalues and their full multiplicities. Iterating the Fischer decomposition expresses every restricted polynomial as a sum of the restricted harmonic polynomials. Restricted polynomials separate points and contain the constants, so the Stone-Weierstrass theorem makes their span dense in continuous functions on the sphere, hence dense in its L2 space. The Laplace-Beltrami operator is self-adjoint, and the distinct numbers strictly increase for . Its different eigenspaces are therefore orthogonal. Any additional eigenfunction, or any additional vector in one of these eigenspaces orthogonal to its known spherical harmonics, would be orthogonal to a dense subspace and hence zero. The standard compact elliptic spectral theorem then shows that the spectrum of the round sphere is precisely with multiplicity . For this gives multiplicity one at zero and two at for . If the degenerate case is included, has two points and its Laplacian is zero on a two-dimensional function space.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 iii Paper 37 2 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Write and use the ordinary Euclidean Laplacian , so the generator of standard Brownian motion is half that operator. For a radial function , the Laplacian in polar coordinates is . With ,Thus is a harmonic function on the punctured space.
We first justify that the singularity is not visited. For , stop at . The Itô formula makes a local martingale, and it is bounded on this annulus, hence a true martingale. The exit time is finite almost surely: by the Gaussian transition density. Taking the bounded terminal limit yieldsIf the origin were reached before , every smaller radius would first be reached, so letting shows that event has probability zero. Taking a countable sequence proves almost surely. Localization on increasing annuli now applies the Itô formula globally and gives the Bessel power local martingaleStopping this continuous local martingale at any , including , preserves its local-martingale property.
For , the stopped path stays at radius at least , so . The bounded local martingale criterion makes it a true martingale. For , Brownian radial oscillations at its starting sphere give almost surely and the stopped process is constant. Thus the same true-martingale conclusion holds for .
For , the process is a strict local martingale. To prove this, write in distribution, with a standard -dimensional normal vector. For every shift ,Indeed the integrand outside the unit ball is at most one, while inside it the Gaussian density is at most and the radial integral is a constant times . Brownian scaling therefore givesA true martingale would have expectation at every time, which is impossible.
The printed range also permits , and this case must not be grouped with the bounded case. Here almost surely, by the same Gaussian bound for exit from a bounded ball. Moreover,since the second expectation is at most . It too is a strict local martingale. The complete stopped inverse radial power martingale classification is therefore
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2013 iii Paper 57 1 b i Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
The rotational invariance of a central-potential Hamiltonian allows a simultaneous eigenstate of energy and the two-dimensional orbital angular momentum . For a separated wavefunction , the Laplacian in polar coordinates givesThe term must be a constant; write . The angular eigenfunctions can be chosen as . Single-valuedness under imposes , hence . The radial equation in the separation of a two-dimensional central-potential eigenstate isFor a real central potential and the usual real self-adjoint radial boundary conditions, the radial equation admits a basis of real solutions: real and imaginary parts of a complex solution obey the same equation and boundary conditions. Choose a real normalized radial eigenfunction. Since the plane area element in plane polar coordinates is , the normalization isThis establishes the intended separated simultaneous eigenstate form. It is not the form of every stationary state. The radial equation depends on , so the and sectors have the same energy. For , their normalized superpositionis a single-valued stationary state with that energy but is not a single angular exponential. Quantum degeneracy is precisely why separation of variables selects a convenient eigenstate basis rather than all vectors in an energy eigenspace. The printed assertion needs this qualification. The printed polar-coordinate aid also labels a gradient component tuple as a divergence; the gradient used below is the two-dimensional vector .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 iii Paper 107 2 i Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
A bounded-domain hypothesis is needed for the requested global construction and uniqueness. The printed question does not include it. For example, the upper half-plane satisfies the stated exterior cone condition, but both and are harmonic functions with zero Dirichlet boundary condition. Thus part (iv), in its printed unrestricted solution class, is false. In this question's solutions we add that is bounded; the exterior cone condition and all other data remain as printed.
The half-plane also rules out the printed global separated barrier. In its angular interval , varying on a fixed ray forces if for every . We would then have and . Put and . Twice integration by parts givescontradicting the positive integrand. Thus a source qualification is necessary for part (i) as well as part (iv).
Fix and its exterior cone of half-angle . Choose and setOn the complement of the cone, unwrap the angle in polar coordinates as , measured from the cone axis. Then is the angle from the opposite axis and on . Define the power barrier for an exterior cone byThis has the requested separated form . In the printed signed-angle convention, the same function is outside the cone. It is smooth across the negative axis: near that axis the angular expression is the even function .
Since , put . The cosine is at least , so away from , and is continuous at . The Laplacian in polar coordinates givesLet . Since , the barrier for the Dirichlet problem satisfiesBoth the uniform lower bound and the later global comparison use boundedness. In particular, is positive at every other boundary point, and is bounded away from zero on boundary sets staying a positive distance from .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 ia Paper 3 4C Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-03
For a scalar , the displayed basis identities giveTaking the divergence and differentiating the basis vectors yields the Laplacian in polar coordinatesConsequently,
The regular harmonic mode with angular dependence is . Its radial derivative at is , so . A constant is invisible to the Neumann boundary condition, givingIf two solutions existed, their difference would satisfy and . Green's first identity gives , so and is constant. Thus these are all the solutions.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the year 1 of the natural sciences course of the University of Cambridge 2006 Paper 2 11 c Solution Created 2026-10-18 Updated 2026-10-20
For polar coordinates with , and . Write , . Applying these operators twice, including their variable coefficients, gives the Cartesian second derivatives in polar coordinates:In particular their sum is the Laplacian in polar coordinates, .
Power barrier for an exterior cone 2026-10-06
For a planar set outside a global solid cone of half-angle , choose , , and . If is the angle from the opposite axis, the Laplacian in polar coordinates givesThe cosine has a positive uniform lower bound outside the original cone. On a bounded set, therefore has a positive uniform lower bound as well. The positive function is a barrier for the Dirichlet problem. An unbounded set does not receive the same global lower bound from this construction.
Spectrum of the round sphere 2026-10-14
For the positive Laplace-Beltrami operator on the unit sphere , with , the eigenvalues are for integers . Their eigenspaces consist of restrictions of degree- harmonic polynomials and have dimensions , with the second term zero for . The Laplacian in polar coordinates gives the eigenvalue; Fischer decomposition and the Stone-Weierstrass theorem prove completeness.
