Foundations and Trends in Optimization 1(4), 241–433; DOI 10.1561/2400000006. PDF lists the volume issue year as 2014 and copyright as 2015; author-hosted course reference and institutional publication record identify 2015.
Cited passages: §4.1–4.2, Algorithm 4.2; §9.1, equation 9.2 and Theorem 9.1.
Convex Optimization by Stephen Boyd and Lieven Vandenberghe Created 2026-10-13 Updated 2026-10-18
Publisher: Cambridge University Press.
Cited passages: Appendix A.5.2, pp. 646–647: symmetric eigenvalue decomposition and definiteness; §2.2.2, p. 30, equation (2.3): ellipsoids and semi-axis lengths; the book uses the inverse quadratic coefficient matrix; §3.1.4, Example 3.2, p. 71: a quadratic function is strictly convex exactly when its symmetric coefficient matrix is positive definite.
Cited passages: Appendix A.5.5, printed p. 650: block inversion and minimized quadratic form; §C.4.1, printed pp. 672–675: block elimination, Algorithm C.4, factor-solve interpretation and dense complexity.
The front matter states first publication in 2004 and a seventh printing with corrections in 2009. The title page credits Stephen Boyd and Lieven Vandenberghe as whole-book coauthors; no separate appendix byline is supplied. Cambridge University Press publishes the book; the Stanford author website hosts this copy.
Cited passages: Appendix A.1.6, printed pp. 636–637, dual norms.
Additional cited passage: §2.1.4, printed p. 24 (PDF page index 37), convex combinations and the definition and minimality of the convex hull. The title-page whole-book credits and the separately recorded 2004 first publication and 2009 corrected seventh printing apply to this copy.
Additional cited passages: §5.6.3, printed pp. 251–253, especially equation (5.58), local sensitivity of the optimal value to equality-constraint perturbations. The sign of the Lagrange multiplier depends on the chosen sign for the equality term. The title page and front matter retain the whole-book authorship, 2004 first publication and 2009 corrected seventh printing recorded above.
Additional locators: §§5.1–5.2, pp.215–227.
Lieven Vandenberghe Created 2026-10-13 Updated 2026-10-14
Strict feasibility for conic duality Created 2026-10-14 Updated 2026-10-31
For a proper cone , suppose a point satisfies and is finite. This generalized Slater condition gives strong duality and attainment of the conic dual problem's optimum. It does not by itself assert primal attainment.[ref]
The two worked examples have strict primal points: has slack in the interior of the nonnegative orthant, and has slack in the interior of the second-order cone. Both optima were already certified by explicit feasible pairs. Slater's condition explains why a matching optimal dual variable can be expected under these hypotheses; checking a supplied zero-gap pair needs only weak duality.
Changing cone geometry preserves the bound mechanism. For a positive semidefinite cone, the dual cone pairing is the Frobenius inner product of two matrices. This connects the same certificate idea to semidefinite programming, while the central path uses strictly interior primal and dual points to approach vanishing gap.
In 1995, Lieven Vandenberghe and Stephen Boyd presented a primal-dual interior-point method for convex optimization with matrix inequalities. Their algorithmic study included exploiting problem structure and allowing incomplete conjugate gradient method solves within an iteration. This illustrates how the primal-dual viewpoint guides computation as well as checking a final answer.[ref]