Acoustic density perturbation 2026-10-06
An acoustic density perturbation is the deviation of fluid mass density from its quiescent reference value. In a homogeneous isentropic linear acoustic field, its corresponding pressure perturbation is . Nonlinear and entropy-dependent departures from this relation enter the Lighthill stress tensor.
Mass and momentum flux defects at a moving interface add surface acoustic monopole and acoustic dipole terms to Lighthill acoustic analogy. For a physical conservative fluid shock wave, the Rankine-Hugoniot conditions set both defects to zero; the shock still affects distributional derivatives of the Lighthill stress tensor. A discontinuity alone is not independent mass or force injection.
Lighthill acoustic analogy 2026-10-06
The Lighthill acoustic analogy rewrites fluid mass and momentum conservation as a constant-speed wave equation driven by a nonlinear Lighthill stress tensor. It is an exact rearrangement before making source approximations. The outgoing field can be constructed with a retarded acoustic Green function.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2015 iii Paper 77 1 b ii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Apply the moving-interface conservation jump identity first to mass, then to each momentum component. Write and , with all quantities understood piecewise on the two sides. Define the jumps of flux relative to the moving shock wave byThe global distributional conservation equations areDifferentiate the first in time and subtract the divergence of the second. With and the piecewise Lighthill stress tensor , this givesDerivatives act on the complete distributions, including their moving support. The acoustic quadrupole term represents momentum-stress fluctuations throughout the volume. The time derivative of the surface mass-flux defect is an acoustic monopole, representing injection or removal of mass/volume. The divergence of the surface momentum-flux defect is an acoustic dipole, representing a force sheet. This is the distributional acoustic analogy across a moving interface.
For an actual freely propagating fluid shock wave with no singular mass or momentum supply, the Rankine-Hugoniot conditions give and . Such a shock does not acquire independent monopole and force-sheet sources merely because it is discontinuous. Its effects remain in the distributional derivatives of , including singular derivatives of its jump. Nonzero surface sources are appropriate for an interface with exchange/forcing or for a formulation that omits one side of the fluid.
A shock does not, by itself, justify retaining the scaling. That estimate required a low-Mach number stress varying on the slow time . Fast shock motion, short time scales, or thermodynamic deviations can invalidate that estimate. If these same compact, slow-source assumptions remain valid for the integrated Lighthill stress tensor, its quadrupole estimate still follows, even distributionally. There is no universal replacement power deducible from the mere presence of a shock; nor should vanished physical flux defects be treated as additional independent radiation sources.