Barrier digital call 2026-10-14
A cash-at-maturity upper-barrier digital option pays a fixed amount if the stock touches an upper barrier by maturity. In the Black-Scholes model, write and . Its unit-payoff price is times the linear-boundary Brownian first-passage distribution at . This differs from paying at the hitting time, when the discount factor is random, and from an ordinary terminal-price digital option.
Barrier digital put 2026-10-14
A contingent claim paying one at maturity if a specified price path has remained below an upper barrier, and zero otherwise. This survival payoff differs from a terminal digital put option, which tests only the terminal price. In the dividend-free Black-Scholes model, its value is the discount factor times the risk-neutral probability of avoiding the barrier, obtainable from the linear-boundary Brownian first-passage distribution.
For the Brownian first-passage time to a line, set and choose , so . The Exponential martingale for Brownian motion , stopped at , obeys
The optional stopping theorem at the bounded time gives expectation one. The contribution from is at most , and tends to zero. Taking therefore yields
Letting shows that the hitting probability is one for and for ; in the latter case the hitting-time law has mass at infinity.
To derive the finite-time linear-boundary Brownian first-passage distribution, put . This is Brownian motion with drift , and the event is . For driftless Brownian motion, the Brownian reflection principle says that the joint endpoint density on this event equals the normal density when and the reflected density when , where . The constant-drift change of measure weights these densities by . Thus the crossing probability is
Completing the square gives respectively and . Substituting proves
The density weighting follows directly from the Exponential martingale for Brownian motion, or the Girsanov theorem, on the fixed finite horizon; it does not require eventual hitting.
For the barrier digital call, under the risk-neutral measure in the Black-Scholes model,
Assume , put and . The upper stock barrier is reached exactly when reaches . The payment is at the fixed maturity , not at the random hitting time. Hence its price is
If , use the deterministic path instead: the value is if that path reaches by , and zero otherwise. The nondegenerate formula concerns the usual positive-volatility model.
Subtract the boundary slope from the Brownian motion: . Then is the first-passage time of to the fixed level . The zero-drift Brownian reflection principle gives
Here is the standard normal distribution function. To change the drift to , use the Girsanov theorem on each finite horizon, with density . On , conditional expectation at the stopped time gives , because the density is a true martingale. Since , the drifted Brownian first-passage density is consequently
There may be additional mass at infinite hitting time; the displayed density only describes finite passage. With , apply the given zero-drift Brownian first-passage Laplace transform:
The zero-discount limit is for and for , so the hitting probability is less than one precisely when the line moves away with positive slope.
For a direct verification of the linear-boundary Brownian first-passage distribution, define
Both terms tend to zero as . Let be the standard normal density. The identity
follows by expanding the two squares. Differentiating the two normal probabilities then gives
Since this is the previously derived hitting density and both distribution functions start at zero,
This proof applies to every real , including the defective distribution when .
For the barrier digital put, use the dividend-free Black-Scholes model with constant interest rate and spot volatility . Under the risk-neutral measure,
Set and
Reaching the barrier is equivalent to reaching . The contingent claim pays one only on the survival event . Risk-neutral pricing therefore gives
This is a path-survival price, not the price of a terminal digital put option. Continuity of the stock paths and the absence of an atom in the finite-horizon maximum imply that alternative touching conventions change no price. As , the value tends to ; as , it tends to zero. Both checks agree with the survival interpretation.