In 1982, Alain Aspect, Jean Dalibard and Gérard Roger used a calcium cascade and an acoustic standing wave in water to route each photon toward one of two fixed polarizers. Switching took about , against for light to cross between stations. Photomultiplier coincidence circuit rates, with delayed-background subtraction and polarizer-removal normalization, violated their Bell inequality. Supplementary polarizers checked each channel against Malus's law. The timing attacked the locality loophole, but the authors emphasized that switching was quasiperiodic, not random; incomplete switching and inefficient collection also limited the test. Its normalized statistic differs from the CHSH inequality convention used below.[ref]
Bas Hensen Created 2026-10-20 Updated 2026-11-05
An experimental physicist who coauthored the 2015 Delft electron-spin Bell test. The experiment entangled electron spins at sites separated by 1.3 kilometres. Efficient readout addressed the detection loophole, while fast random measurement choices and the separation addressed the locality loophole. The observed violation of a Bell inequality tested local realism without relying on fair sampling of undetected events.[ref]
Delft electron-spin Bell test Created 2026-10-20 Updated 2026-11-05
The Bell test reported by Bas Hensen and collaborators used electron spins separated by , efficient spin readout and rapid random measurement settings. Those features addressed detection and locality loopholes together. Its result tests Bell local causality with the stated experimental assumptions, rather than ruling out every possible hidden-variable theory.[ref]
Locality loophole 2026-10-18
The locality loophole permits a station's outcome to be influenced by the distant setting through an ordinary signal arriving before readout. Spacelike separation excludes such communication at or below the speed of light. Fast changes only help if the relevant choice and detection events have the required timing. Predictable switching also leaves open correlations with earlier settings; closing a communication channel does not prove measurement independence.