The chief historical examples are rhubarb, senna, santonin and logwood for urine; iron preparations, bismuth preparations and charcoal for darkening the faeces. There are two different processes: a substance absorbed and subsequently excreted can colour a secretion, while material remaining in the intestinal lumen can colour the stools without demonstrating systemic drug absorption.
- Rhubarb colours urine yellow to yellow-brown; the colour becomes redder in an alkaline solution. The contemporary account also reports coloration of sweat and breast milk. This is a historical observation about passage of colouring matter, not a claim that every constituent passes unchanged into every secretion. [ref]The Essentials of Materia Medica and Therapeutics by Alfred Baring Garrod (1865). Labiatae, continued, Rheum: colouring constituent, alkaline solutions, and coloration of urine, perspiration and milk
- Senna can give urine a yellow-brown or red-brown colour. The effect is still recognised in current medicinal information. [ref]Senna by the NHS. Side effects, coloration of urine
- Santonin, used historically as an anthelmintic, can make urine conspicuously yellow. This must be distinguished from the drug's separate effect on colour vision: a yellow-looking visual field is not itself excretion of a yellow pigment. [ref]A Manual of Practical Therapeutics by Edward John Waring (1865). §2416, physiological effects and yellow urine
- Logwood can give urine a pink or reddish colour, particularly when it is an alkaline solution; the historical description notes that addition of Ammonia brings out the colour in a previously acid specimen. [ref]The Essentials of Materia Medica and Therapeutics by Alfred Baring Garrod (1865). Cisalpinae, Haematoxylum, urine coloration
- Iron preparations can darken faeces; bismuth preparations also cause dark or black stools. In these examples the result need not be a pre-existing vegetable dye simply passing unchanged through the body. Current information confirms black stools with oral iron and with the modern bismuth medicine bismuth subsalicylate; the latter is corroboration of the colour effect, not an identification of that modern formulation with the 1864 bismuth articles. [ref]Bleeding from the bottom by the NHS. Dark stools and iron tablets[ref]Pepto-Bismol by the NHS. Side effects: black stools and black tongue
- Charcoal supplies a black material directly to the bowel contents. Its appearance in the stools does not require its absorption and subsequent renal excretion.
Colour alone does not identify either the drug or a disease. A medicinal pigment can resemble blood or a bile pigment; pH, timing after administration and appropriate chemical or microscopic examination distinguish possibilities. Conversely, a history of taking a colouring medicine does not prove that an observed specimen contains no blood. These examples describe pharmacological and historical observations, not results from an unseen specimen.
Decoction suits material whose useful constituents are water-soluble and withstand boiling; infusion avoids sustained boiling and can better preserve delicate or volatile constituents. The choice depends on both the plant's structure and the chemistry of the constituent being extracted.
Hard bark, wood and many kinds of root need comminution and more prolonged contact with hot water to penetrate their tissues; a decoction can assist extraction when the desired material is stable. Boiling is unsuitable when it drives off a needed volatile oil, decomposes the active constituent, or extracts an unwanted excess of starch or other material. A hard root is therefore not automatically an instruction to boil. Period examples suitable for decoction include oak bark, logwood and pareira root; appropriate infusions include aromatic cloves and chamomile. Cold infusion of calumba avoids dissolving its starch, illustrating that suitability depends on the desired selectivity of solvent extraction, not merely on whether a drug is a leaf or a root. [ref]
For an infusion, the appropriately divided drug is left in a measured solvent for a prescribed time, commonly in a covered vessel. Hot water assists extraction, while a cover reduces loss of volatile matter. Cold infusion can be chosen when heat is undesirable. The result must be strained or filtered; time, temperature, particle size and solvent quantity affect its strength. Neither method guarantees that every constituent is extracted in the same proportion.
A liquid extract is made by extracting the specified drug with a suitable solvent, separating the liquid from the exhausted material, and bringing the extract to its prescribed concentration and volume. Maceration can precede percolation; expression or washing recovers retained liquid. A percolator passes fresh solvent through a packed bed, rather than indefinitely soaking the drug in an increasingly saturated liquid. Where concentration is necessary, controlled evaporation limits damage; an alcoholic fraction can be reserved or recombined as the monograph directs. Different liquid extracts can use aqueous, alcoholic or ethereal processes. For example, the liquid extract of male fern is an ethereal extraction of a resinous and oily fraction, whereas the liquid extract of opium is compounded from a previously made aqueous extract. These are chemically different operations. There is no warrant for assigning all 1864 extracts one modern universal drug-to-extract ratio. [ref]
The Prescriber's Analysis of the British Pharmacopoeia by John Birkbeck Nevins (1864). pp. 20–21 and 42–43, differing liquid extracts and strengths; p. 15, percolation