Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2015 iii Paper 37 2 d Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
The useful autoregressive model is for the squares, not for signed observations. Put andThenThe errors form a martingale difference sequence relative to the noise history, because the current standardized noise is independent of the past. When the fourth moment is finite they have finite variance and are uncorrelated across distinct times, although their conditional variance depends on the regressor. In centered form, .
For ordinary least squares, use the response-regressor pairs , , . With their separate means and , minimize . If the regressor sum of squares is positive, the estimators areThe two means use the matched pairs; replacing them indiscriminately by a single full-sample mean is not the exact least-squares formula. The noise-series representation supplies an ergodic stationary process. If , finite regressor second moments and the error's zero conditional expectation justify the usual population regression and statistical consistency argument. The observations still define a finite-sample least-squares fit outside that moment range, but the ordinary finite-variance justification must not be claimed there. If parameter constraints are required, minimize the same criterion subject to and , rather than assert that unconstrained estimates automatically satisfy them.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2015 iii Paper 37 2 e ii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
This covariance is also zero, but symmetry is essential to the proof. Write , where is an independent fair sign. The normal distribution makes that sign independent of its magnitude and of every other driving variable. Conditional on the magnitudes and all noise except this sign, changing flips and leaves unchanged. Every future conditional scale uses only squared past observations, so is unchanged for .
Thus is independent of the remaining fair sign in . Averaging that sign gives , and henceThe Cauchy-Schwarz inequality again guarantees integrability. For odd , the parity decomposition of a lag-two ARCH process also gives independence directly. For even , the sign symmetry of an ARCH process supplies the argument; the martingale difference sequence property alone would not justify this reversed covariance.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2015 iii Paper 37 2 e i Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
The covariance is zero. Let . The stationary noise-series representation makes measurable with respect to , whereas the martingale difference sequence property gives . The law of total expectation therefore givesSince , this is the required covariance. All products are integrable by the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, using finite second moments of and the stipulated square integrability of .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 iii Paper 201 1 e Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Write for the martingale difference sequence. Bounded increments mean that one deterministic satisfies for every , almost surely. Then and, for ,The increments are uncorrelated random variables, uniformly bounded in . Applying the supplied strong law for uniformly L2-bounded uncorrelated random variables gives almost surely. Also , because is finite almost surely. Therefore a martingale with bounded increments has zero linear growth:This is the strong law for martingales with bounded increments.
For the submartingale, let and define its predictable drift and compensator byThis is the Doob decomposition in discrete time. The process is a martingale. Since , we have , so . The result just proved gives almost surely, and . Consequently the strong law for submartingales with bounded increments isThe compensator may grow, so the conclusion is a lower bound rather than a claim of convergence to zero.
Sign symmetry of an ARCH process 2026-10-06
With symmetric driving noise whose sign is independent of its magnitude, changing the sign of one driving variable changes the corresponding but leaves future conditional scales unchanged. Consequently for and square-integrable . This conclusion uses symmetry, beyond the martingale difference sequence property.
If a martingale has increments bounded by a single deterministic constant, then almost surely. Its increments form a uniformly -bounded martingale difference sequence; apply the strong law for uniformly L2-bounded uncorrelated random variables to their partial sums and note . No square-integrability of the initial value is needed beyond the usual martingale integrability.