Let be a linear map. It is positive when implies , and completely positive when
is positive for every ancillary dimension . In finite dimensions it is enough to check .
A finite family of Kraus operators defines the Kraus representation
This map is completely positive because, for every positive semidefinite matrix on the enlarged space,
Conversely, use the unnormalized maximally entangled vector . Complete positivity makes the Choi matrix
positive semidefinite. By the spectral theorem for normal operators, , where . Reshape each into a matrix by . The Choi matrix inversion formula
then gives . Thus finite Kraus representations characterize finite-dimensional completely positive maps.
The additional normalization
makes trace preserving and hence a quantum channel; instead makes it unital.
The average of vanishes unless the exponent of every independent fourth root is balanced modulo four. The surviving index patterns are and . Their intersection has been counted twice. Hence, writing
the phase average is
Solving for the projector onto the maximally entangled state gives
Entanglement monogamy says that maximal entanglement with one independent system excludes entanglement with another. For three qubits this is quantified by the Coffman--Kundu--Wootters inequality
For example, if is a maximally entangled state, then and the global state factorizes as up to local unitaries, so . The three-qubit GHZ state instead has entanglement across every one-versus-two cut but no pairwise concurrence after the third qubit is traced out.
For ,
Each is a maximally entangled state, so the Choi matrix is a convex combination of maximally entangled pure states.
For equal masses with positions , the two-body Schrodinger equation is
Neglecting wave-packet spreading and overlap, write for the packet . The initial state and its branchwise gravitational evolution are
up to local kinetic phases. The branch dependence of the Newtonian gravitational potential energy is the source of gravitationally induced entanglement.
Under the approximation stated in the question, only the matching pairs acquire an appreciable common phase
The coefficient matrix of the resulting bipartite state is
where is the all-ones matrix. Therefore
A maximally entangled state would require . This demands
That equation has no solution for . Thus the requested large- conclusion does not follow from the assumptions printed in the paper: within the stated approximation, the system never becomes maximally entangled in the large- limit. For completeness, maximal entanglement is possible for at and for at ; for it occurs at or . The time would be
but it is not a large- answer.
The system also does not remain entangled for every . Whenever , the phase matrix again factorizes and the state returns to its initial product state. The revival period is
For it is entangled at all intervening times; for there is the additional product-state revival at .
Every density operator with positive partial transpose has squared quantum fidelity at most with a fixed maximally entangled state on . The partial transpose of a maximally entangled projector and the trace-adjoint identity for partial transpose express that squared overlap as . Since is positive of trace one and the swap operator has operator norm one, trace duality gives the bound. A matching product state attains equality.
A quantum channel is entanglement breaking exactly when its Choi state is a separable quantum state. If , the Choi reconstruction formula gives a measure-and-prepare channel with POVM . Conversely, applying an entanglement-breaking channel to a maximally entangled state produces a separable Choi state. Horodecki, Shor and Ruskai's entanglement-breaking channel paper develops the equivalences.