The Schrödinger equation governs the evolution of a quantum state between instances of measurement in quantum mechanics. For a particle of mass moving in a prescribed real potential energy , its position wavefunction satisfiesHere is the Planck constant, is the Laplace operator, and the Hamiltonian operator combines kinetic energy with potential energy. Specify an initial wavefunction, an operator domain and any boundary conditions: the differential expression alone does not completely specify a physical model. The Born rule then turns the evolving probability amplitude into position probabilities through and integration over a region.
This scalar Schrödinger operator describes nonrelativistic quantum mechanics, with relevant momenta much smaller than , where is the speed of light. It omits the constant rest energy , assumes fixed particle number, and suppresses active spin dynamics and coupling to a magnetic vector potential. A free electron with a fixed, uncoupled spin state can still use this scalar model; the Pauli equation supplies the additional spin components and magnetic coupling when needed. A prescribed real describes a closed evolution model or an approximation in which the source of that potential energy is treated as external. Dissipation, particle creation and a general measurement in quantum mechanics need further modelling.
For a time-independent self-adjoint Hamiltonian operator, the spectral theorem defines unitary time evolution byInitial states in the operator domain satisfy the differential equation in the Hilbert space sense; the unitary operator also evolves all other states in that Hilbert space. Time-dependent Hamiltonian operators need suitable regularity and domain hypotheses; their evolution is not generally the exponential of .
The local reason for conservation is especially tangible. Multiply the Schrödinger equation by the complex conjugate , subtract its conjugate multiplied by , and use the fact that the real potential energy terms cancel. For smooth wavefunctions this gives the probability continuity equationThe divergence theorem identifies the change in probability inside a region with minus the outward probability current. Decay at infinity, or appropriate probability-conserving boundary conditions, preserves wavefunction normalization. Conservation of total probability does not require a stationary probability density.
Its usefulness comes from being a linear partial differential equation: quantum superpositions of solutions are solutions, while different quantum phases can produce interference. For a fixed Hamiltonian operator, the time-independent Schrödinger equation finds the energy eigenstates; each then acquires just its own time-dependent quantum phase. One eigenvalue problem therefore organizes both allowed energies and the evolution of arbitrary quantum superpositions, with a continuous spectrum included when required. This is the attractive bridge between a spatial wave problem and a clock: energy differences determine the rate at which relative quantum phases change. It makes atomic spectral lines, quantum tunnelling and quantum scattering calculable from a specified model.
For an explicit example without confinement, take a free particle on the whole line, , initially in a Gaussian wave packet with position standard deviation and mean momentum :Unlike a single plane wave, this wavefunction satisfies wavefunction normalization. A Fourier transform writes it as a quantum superposition of plane waves. Their dispersion relation is , so each Fourier component gains the factor . Completing the square in the resulting Gaussian integral giveswith the square root chosen continuously from . Its position probability density and standard deviation areThe centre moves with the group velocity and the wave packet spreads because different wavenumbers have different group velocities. This is unitary wave dispersion, without a random force or loss of probability. Independently, the initial momentum standard deviation is and the initial position-momentum covariance vanishes. Free evolution gives in the Heisenberg picture, henceThis independently checks the spreading law. The Gaussian integral of is one at every time; the decreasing peak is exactly offset by increasing width.
As hypothetical preparation parameters, choose a free electron with and . Using and givesThe rounded electron mass uses the 2022 adjustment.[ref]
CODATA Value: electron mass by National Institute of Standards and Technology. Electron mass, 2022 CODATA adjustment; rounded here to eight significant figures
At , the centre is and ; at , they are and . The mean kinetic energy staysIt includes both mean motion and the momentum spread. The mean speed is about and the momentum spread corresponds to , making the nonrelativistic model accurate for the appreciably occupied part of this ideal Gaussian distribution. Its mathematically unbounded tails are an idealization.The complex width also explains where the probability goes. Write , where is the dimensionless quantum phase. Differentiating the exact solution givesRelative to the moving centre, the probability current points outward on both sides for . This is a flux statement, not an additional assumption about individual particle trajectories. At and , the relative flow speeds are , about . The probability within a moving interval of half-width falls from about initially to at , exactly because of this outward probability current.
Curved quantum phase drives spreading probability current
. The same free Gaussian wave packet at . With , removing the carrier and a spatially constant quantum phase leaves . The right panel plots : negative to the left, positive to the right. Flux through the marked moving interval endpoints explains its decreasing probability. Source. Details.Historically, the 1926 Quantisierung als Eigenwertproblem (Erste Mitteilung) by Erwin Schrödinger began with the stationary hydrogen atom problem. It distinguishes discrete negative energies from a positive continuous spectrum; it is not yet the general evolution equation displayed above.[ref]
Quantisierung als Eigenwertproblem (Erste Mitteilung) by Erwin Schrödinger. Printed pp. 361–363, especially p. 362: discrete and continuous spectrum
The opening of quantum mechanics discusses its original vibrating-string analogy.In the 12 December 1933 lecture The fundamental idea of wave mechanics by Erwin Schrödinger, Erwin Schrödinger explains the move from independent rays to waves through diffraction, then applies that analogy to atomic physics. His closing pages explicitly acknowledge the difficulty of reconciling wave language with observed particle tracks. This retrospective physical argument motivates the model; it does not derive the modern Born rule from classical mechanics.[ref]
The fundamental idea of wave mechanics by Erwin Schrödinger. Nobel Lectures, Physics 1922–1941, printed pp. 313–316; inspected in the Columbia University mirror
The dates separate proposal from measurement: the de Broglie wavelength belongs to the 1924 thesis, the Schrödinger equation to 1926, and the Davisson–Germer experiment's electron diffraction beams to 1927.[ref]
The discovery of electron waves by Clinton J. Davisson. Printed pp. 389–390: 1924 proposal, deliberate 1926 search and early-1927 diffraction discovery
That linked experiment describes the prepared nickel crystal, evacuated electron gun, angular collector scans, retarding-potential selection and heating controls. Its measured collector electric current tests wave-dependent scattering probabilities; it neither measures a wavefunction directly nor establishes this equation uniquely.For a spherically symmetric potential energy , separation of variables with reduces the Schrödinger equation to the displayed radial equation. Writing instead removes the first derivative:The angular contribution acts as a centrifugal barrier. Boundary behavior and wavefunction normalization must still be imposed; an arbitrary radial function is not an energy eigenfunction.
For a nonrelativistic spin-one-half electron of charge , with , the Pauli Hamiltonian isThe wavefunction has two spin components and . If , then ; the Pauli matrix multiplication law gives , explaining the spin-coupling sign. Thus extends the Schrödinger equation to include the electron's magnetic moment.
A two-component complex wave function describing the two spin states of a nonrelativistic spin- particle. Under a spatial rotation by angle about it transforms as , with Pauli matrices . A Pauli spinor may describe a massive particle; two components alone do not imply the massless Weyl equation.
For with , take . The spin-down transverse Hamiltonian at momentum label is proportional to , where . It is nonnegative, and gives the displayed zero mode. Since , its exponent has a negative quadratic upper bound at both infinities, proving square integrability for every . The continuously varying momentum label supplies an infinitely degenerate zero-energy space.
The free Schrodinger equation describes linear dispersive evolution without a potential term. In this normalization a spectral mode is . On a half-line, boundary data enter through the global relation for the half-line free Schrodinger equation.
For a time-independent Hamiltonian operator , an energy eigenstate satisfiesFor a one-dimensional particle of mass in a real potential energy ,Its full time-dependent wavefunction is : substitution in the Schrödinger equation checks both the minus sign and the factor . Thus an energy eigenstate has stationary position probability density, even though its quantum phase evolves. The boundary conditions and operator domain are part of this eigenvalue problem, selecting physically allowed solutions; the infinite square well and Radial Schrodinger equation for the hydrogen atom give complementary confined examples.
For a complete discrete orthonormal basis of energy eigenstates, linearity gives , with . Cross terms in oscillate at angular frequencies . A continuous spectrum requires the corresponding spectral integrals; for a free particle on the whole line, individual plane waves are generalized eigenfunctions, and a normalized Gaussian wave packet is their integral quantum superposition. Adding a spatially constant real to shifts every energy eigenvalue by and multiplies the full state by , a global phase; energy differences, position probabilities and probability current are unchanged.
For a real, sufficiently smooth, nonvanishing wavefunction of a particle with constant mass, the time-independent Schrödinger equation determines the potential energy through the displayed logarithmic-curvature formula. An additive choice of energy origin fixes the remaining constant. For with and , it gives and . At a node the quotient must instead be interpreted by a limit; an arbitrary trial wavefunction can produce singularities rather than a regular potential.
A classically forbidden region would require negative classical kinetic energy, but a quantum wavefunction need not vanish there. For constant potential energy, it is with . Boundary matching determines both coefficients. Beside a hard wall at , a nonzero forbidden-region solution is proportional to , and therefore has no interior nodes. Across a finite barrier, both exponentials are generally needed; a pure decaying exponential is appropriate only when the other boundary condition permits it.
For a particle of fixed energy , a classically allowed region has positive classical kinetic energy . For a constant potential energy, the stationary wavefunction is a combination of and , where is the wavenumber. In a varying potential energy this local value underlies the WKB approximation away from turning points.
For a finite jump in a one-dimensional potential energy, with constant mass and no delta potential, both the wavefunction and its first spatial derivative are continuous. Integrating the time-independent Schrödinger equation across a vanishing interval makes the jump in vanish, since the integral of vanishes. A jump in itself would produce a derivative of a Dirac delta function in , with no matching term in the equation. The second derivative can jump. This matching allows transmission and quantum tunnelling; a finite step is not a hard wall.
In an even, piecewise constant potential, integrate outward from the centre with either even boundary conditions or odd boundary conditions . Match the wavefunction and its derivative at every finite step and impose exponential decay outside. The resulting discrete energies alternate in parity, with the fourth bound state odd and containing three nodes of a wavefunction. There is no hard-wall zero at a finite step; the second derivative changes according to .
For equal-mass one-dimensional scattering between regions with real wavenumbers , insert a layer of width and wavenumber . For a purely right-moving incident wave of amplitude and no reflection, continuity at the first edge gives interior amplitudes and . If , continuity at the second edge gives a transmitted edge amplitude and the matching condition . Thus and the transmitted probability current equals the incident current, despite their unequal amplitudes.
For potentials with , the condition is , or , requiring . It is the quantum-wave counterpart of a quarter-wave impedance transformer: the intermediate wavenumber is the geometric mean and the two reflected amplitudes cancel.
A Schrödinger operator is a differential operator of the formwhere is the Laplace operator and is a potential function. Its eigenvalue problem is the time-independent Schrödinger equation.
A self-adjoint operator of this form with supplies the Quantum Hamiltonian of a particle in the potential .
Matching a wavefunction and its derivative across finite potential discontinuities, together with decay or wall conditions, permits only discrete bound-state energies.
Writing the wavefunction in modulus and dimensionless quantum phase gives a probability continuity equation and a Hamilton-Jacobi equation with a quantum potential:The phase equations hold locally away from wavefunction nodes. They follow by equating real and imaginary parts of the Time-dependent Schrödinger equation.
Two bound-state solutions of the same one-dimensional time-independent Schrödinger equation have constant Wronskian. Their decay at infinity makes this constant zero, so the two solutions are linearly dependent. Every bound-state energy is therefore nondegenerate.
Articles by others on the same topic
This is a section about Schrödinger equation!
For example, this sentence. And then another one.
The Schrödinger equation is a fundamental equation in quantum mechanics that describes how the quantum state of a physical system changes over time. It is a key principle in understanding wave functions and the behavior of particles at the quantum level. There are two forms of the Schrödinger equation: 1. **Time-dependent Schrödinger equation**: This form is used to describe how the quantum state evolves over time.
Experiments explained:
- via the Schrödinger equation solution for the hydrogen atom it predicts:
- spectral line basic lines, plus Zeeman effect
- Schrödinger equation solution for the helium atom: perturbative solutions give good approximations to the energy levels
- double-slit experiment: I think we have a closed solution for the max and min probabilities on the measurement wall, and they match experiments
Experiments not explained: those that the Dirac equation explains like:
The easiest to understand case of the equation which you must have in mind initially that of the Schrödinger equation for a free one dimensional particle.
Then, with that in mind, the general form of the Schrödinger equation is:where:
Equation 1.
Schrodinger equation
. - is the reduced Planck constant
- is the wave function
- is the time
- is a linear operator called the Hamiltonian. It takes as input a function , and returns another function. This plays a role analogous to the Hamiltonian in classical mechanics: determining it determines what the physical system looks like, and how the system evolves in time, because we can just plug it into the equation and solve it. It basically encodes the total energy and forces of the system.
The argument of could be anything, e.g.:Note however that there is always a single magical time variable. This is needed in particular because there is a time partial derivative in the equation, so there must be a corresponding time variable in the function. This makes the equation explicitly non-relativistic.
- we could have preferred polar coordinates instead of linear ones if the potential were symmetric around a point
- we could have more than one particle, e.g. solutions of the Schrodinger equation for two electrons, which would have e.g. and for different particles. No matter how many particles there are, we have just a single , we just add more arguments to it.
- we could have even more generalized coordinates. This is much in the spirit of Hamiltonian mechanics or generalized coordinates
The general Schrödinger equation can be broken up into a trivial time-dependent and a time-independent Schrödinger equation by separation of variables. So in practice, all we need to solve is the slightly simpler time-independent Schrödinger equation, and the full equation comes out as a result.

