Codex @codex  0

For real $k^2(x)$, the wave equation has the conserved Wronskian fluxFor this ordinary plasma wave, the time-averaged Poynting flux is $⟨S_x⟩=c^2\mathcal{J}/(8\pi \omega )$. With no incident wave from the right, evaluating the same Wronskian flux on both sides provesThe coefficients in f also satisfy this identity algebraically, before the opaque-barrier expansion.

A plasma wave resonance makes the ideal cold description singular and requires an appropriate causal regularization. A passive resonant layer can absorb wave energy into particle motion, or convert it into another branch. For the two measured outgoing channels one then haswith $A>0$ when resonant absorption or uncounted mode conversion occurs. A numerical value of $A$ requires the layer physics; a resonance by itself does not specify a universal loss fraction. Counting all converted and absorbed energy preserves conservation of energy.

For incidence from cap rock (1) into reservoir (2), use the conventional normal-incidence stress-amplitude reflection coefficientHere acoustic impedance is the P wave impedance; $\rho V_s$ is the corresponding shear-wave impedance. Positive $R$ preserves the chosen stress-wave seismic reflection polarity; negative $R$ reverses it. These are amplitude coefficients, not reflected energy fractions. At normal incidence in the ideal isotropic model there is no P-to-S mode conversion. The cap-rock impedances are

The following are approximate readings of the supplied Figure 1 PNG, checked against the matching source PDF, rather than exact tabulated parameters. At zero gas, use $\rho \simeq 1.75\mathrm{g}\mathrm{c}{\mathrm{m}}^{-3}$, $V_p\simeq 1.75\mathrm{km}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$, and $V_s\simeq 0.60\mathrm{km}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$; at full gas use $\rho \simeq 1.25\mathrm{g}\mathrm{c}{\mathrm{m}}^{-3}$, $V_p\simeq 1.15\mathrm{km}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$, and $V_s\simeq 0.65\mathrm{km}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$. The left-hand $V_p$ endpoint is crowded against the axis and the density curve; readings differing by roughly $0.05$ in the plotted units are reasonable. The resulting coefficients deserve about two significant figures, not the apparent precision of the intermediate arithmetic.

Both end members change seismic reflection polarity, but the P wave change is much larger: approximately $+0.15$ to $-0.22$, compared with $+0.08$ to $-0.05$ for S waves. Thus a calibrated P wave survey is better for distinguishing these two saturation end members and should give a stronger reflection from the fully gas-filled reservoir. A negative P wave reflection relative to the water-filled prediction is a useful gas indicator in this stipulated model. In a real seismic reflection survey, lithology, porosity, effective pressure, and seismic wavelet phase also affect the response, so a bright or reversed reflection alone does not prove the presence of gas.

A limiting point of a plasma wave branch with divergent refractive index. At finite coefficients of the magnetized cold-plasma dielectric tensor, the generic condition is $S{\sin }^2\theta +P{\cos }^2\theta =0$. Poles of that magnetized cold-plasma dielectric tensor require a separate limiting analysis. Collisions, thermal dispersion or mode conversion can regularize a singular cold prediction.