Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2002 iii Paper 20 2 iii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Here is a precise base change of a pullback square statement. Suppose is a pullback in a category and is a morphism. Assume the pullbacks in a categoryexist, where is the common composite. The induced square with vertices is a pullback in a category; equivalently,Indeed, compatible morphisms and give morphisms , , and a common , with the composites of to both equal to . The original pullback in a category gives a unique morphism with projections . Its composite to is , so the defining pullback in a category for gives a unique morphism above . Its maps to and are the prescribed ones by uniqueness in those pullbacks in a category. Conversely, these projections recover , so every possible factorization is the same. This proves the universal property without requiring arbitrary categorical limits in the ambient category.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2002 iii Paper 20 2 ii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Keep the notation of the preceding part. For and satisfying , we have . The outside pullback in a category gives a unique with and . Moreover . The morphisms thus have the same composites with and . Uniqueness in the right pullback in a category gives . Any factorization through the left square also factors through the outside rectangle, so it is unique there. The left square is a pullback. Together these two arguments prove the pullback pasting lemma.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2002 iii Paper 20 2 i Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Name the upper objects and the lower objects , so the morphisms are , , , , , , and . The commutative diagram gives and .
Take and with . The right pullback in a category gives a unique with and . The left pullback in a category then gives a unique with and . It follows that , giving the required factorization through the outside rectangle. Any other factorization has the same middle morphism by uniqueness in the right pullback in a category, and therefore is the same by uniqueness in the left pullback in a category. The outside rectangle is a pullback.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2002 iii Paper 20 3 ii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Let be a terminal object. The pullback in a category of has precisely the universal property of the binary product in a category : every pair of morphisms to is compatible over . Repeated binary products in a category, together with as the empty product, give all finite products in a category.
For , form the pullback in a category of the categorical diagonal along . Its projection satisfies . If satisfies , the pair gives a unique morphism into this pullback in a category. Conversely any such morphism must project to that pair. Hence is the equalizer of . The preceding construction now gives all finite limits.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2002 iii Paper 20 3 i Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
For a functor with finite indexing category, form the finite products in a categoryDefine by requiring the coordinate indexed by to be for and for . Let be their equalizer, and put . The equality says exactly that for every morphism , so these morphisms form a categorical cone.
For any other categorical cone , the product in a category gives a unique with . The categorical cone equations give , so the equalizer gives a unique with . This is exactly the universal property of a categorical limit. Empty indexing products are terminal objects, so the construction includes the empty diagram in a category. Thus finite products and equalizers give all finite limits.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2002 iii Paper 20 4 ii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Choose for each a categorical limit of , with projections . For , the morphisms form a categorical cone over , since the two actions of the product functor commute. Define by the equationsExistence and uniqueness follow from the universal property. The identity morphism of satisfies the equations for , and satisfies those for , so uniqueness gives and . Hence is a functor.
If with projections are other choices, there is a unique isomorphism carrying every projection to the corresponding projection. The same equations show , because their composites with all agree. Thus the choices give a unique natural isomorphism compatible with the chosen categorical limit categorical cones. Without the compatibility condition, uniqueness of an arbitrary natural isomorphism is not asserted.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2002 iii Paper 20 4 i Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
For , define the functor bywhere is the constant diagram functor; a morphism into acts by precomposition on every categorical cone leg. A categorical limit is a representation of a functor of the formThe image of is the universal categorical cone . By naturality of the representing isomorphism, the image of is . Thus this definition is exactly existence and uniqueness of factorization of every categorical cone through . Conversely that universal property gives the representing natural bijection.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2002 iii Paper 20 5 iii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
The category of elements has objects for , and morphisms with . Send to the representable presheaf , and a morphism to . The element supplies a natural transformation with component , by the Yoneda lemma. These transformations form a cocone.
Pointwise at , the colimit of this diagram in a category has representatives , with relation . These are exactly the relations of the preceding categorical coend. Its proved natural isomorphism with therefore identifies the cocone with the universal colimit cocone. More directly, every representative equals through the morphism ; two representatives with the same image therefore agree. As is small, is small, so this is an ordinary small colimit. Consequently
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2002 iii Paper 20 5 i Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Let . A categorical end is an object with morphisms satisfying, for every ,It is universal among such families: any satisfying the same equations is uniquely for one . This is a universal dinatural transformation from the constant value , and is written .
Dually a categorical coend is with morphisms satisfyingAny family satisfying these equations is uniquely for one . Write . For small , the categorical end can be constructed as the equalizer of when these objects exist. The categorical coend is the coequalizer of when those objects exist. The two morphisms impose exactly the displayed equations for a dinatural transformation.