Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2002 iii Paper 20 9 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
For the general alternative, let be a functor between locally small categories, with a complete category. The Freyd general adjoint functor theorem says that has a left adjoint if and only if it preserves small categorical limits and satisfies the solution-set condition. Explicitly, for every , there must be a set of morphisms such that every has the form for some and . Equivalently, each comma category has a weakly initial set.
We prove the initial-object lemma for complete categories with a weakly initial set. Let be a locally small category which is complete and has a weakly initial set . Its product in a category is weakly initial: for each , choose a morphism and compose with the projection . The hom-set is a set. Form equalizing every endomorphism of with , by taking the equalizer of the two morphismswhose -coordinates are and . Then for every endomorphism , and is monic. There is a morphism for every , by composing with a weakly initial morphism out of .
To prove uniqueness, let and take their equalizer . Weak initiality of gives . The composite is an endomorphism, so . Cancel the monomorphism to obtain . Thus is both monic and split epic, hence an isomorphism: if , cancellation from gives . Since , it follows that . Therefore is an initial object, proving the lemma fully.
Now assume categorical limit preservation and the solution-set condition. The comma category is locally small. It is complete: for a small diagram in a category , take its underlying categorical limit in . Since preserves this categorical limit, the compatible give a unique . The same universal property shows that is the categorical limit in the comma category. Its weakly initial set and the proved lemma therefore supply an initial object . For , its universal property defines a unique with . Uniqueness proves the identity morphism and composition in a category laws and the naturality of . The same universal property gives the natural bijection , so .
For necessity, an adjunction supplies the singleton weakly initial set at . It also proves that preserves categorical limits: maps correspond to maps , and compatible families of the latter factor uniquely through any categorical limit in . Hence the image categorical cone under has the required universal property. This proves both directions of the general alternative.
For the special alternative, the limit form of the special adjoint functor theorem says: if is complete, locally small and well-powered, with a small cogenerating family , and is locally small, then has a left adjoint exactly when it preserves small categorical limits. A cogenerating set means that unequal parallel morphisms are distinguished by some morphism . We prove the needed solution-set condition, so that the general theorem applies.
Fix . A supporting subobject of is a monomorphism through whose image under the morphism factors. There is at least one, namely . Because is well-powered, choose a set of representatives of all these supporting subobjects. A limit-preserving functor preserves monomorphisms: a map is monic exactly when its diagonal into its self-pullback in a category is an isomorphism, and both the pullback in a category and this isomorphism are preserved. Consequently each factorization of through is unique. Form the intersection of subobjects of the supporting representatives, as a wide pullback in a category over . The unique lifts of are compatible and, since preserves that categorical limit, they give a factorizationThis is a minimal supported subobject. More explicitly, if also supports , then is one of the supporting subobjects of . The intersection therefore factors through , giving with . Monicity of gives ; monicity of then makes invertible.
For any , if , the equalizer of supports , because preserves that equalizer. Minimality makes it invertible, so . We have therefore obtained injective functionsLet be the realized image subset of the fixed set . Use the unique morphism corresponding to each to form the evaluation embedding into cogenerator productsThis morphism is monic: if two morphisms into have identical product composites, every morphism from to every gives identical composites, and the cogenerating property makes the two morphisms equal. There is only a set of possible families of subsets , and hence a set of possible products . Each has only a set of subobjects by well-poweredness, and each chosen subobject has only a set of morphisms by local smallness. Take all these pairs as a weakly initial set. Every original receives a morphism from a pair representing its , through . Thus the set is weakly initial in .
The general theorem now supplies a left adjoint. Necessity again follows from preservation of categorical limits by a right adjoint. This proves the special alternative, including its size argument. Using only the realized subsets avoids assuming that an arbitrary object admits a morphism into every cogenerator. Both adjoint functor theorem alternatives are proved.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2004 iii Paper 23 1 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Use the Freyd general adjoint functor theorem: a functor , with complete and both categories locally small, has a left adjoint precisely when it preserves small categorical limits and satisfies the solution-set condition. The latter means that every comma category has a small weakly initial set.
Here is the proof. First prove the initial-object lemma for complete categories with a weakly initial set. In a complete locally small category , take the product in a category of a small weakly initial family. It is weakly initial: project to whichever member admits a morphism into the required object. Form the simultaneous equalizer of every endomorphism of and ; local smallness makes this a small limit.
For parallel , let be their equalizer. Weak initiality supplies . Since is an endomorphism of , the defining equalities give . Cancel the monomorphism to get . Thus is a split epimorphism as well as a monomorphism, hence invertible, and . Existence of a morphism follows by composing with a map . Therefore is an initial object.
Now, if preserves small categorical limits, each has them: take the limit of the underlying -diagram and use preservation to assemble its maps out of . It is locally small and has a weakly initial solution set, so the lemma produces an initial object . Its universal property gives natural bijectionsThe universal arrows define on morphisms, proving . Conversely, a right adjoint preserves categorical limits, and its unit supplies a singleton solution set in each comma category.
Apply this to . The functor category is complete and locally small because is small; pointwise limits in a functor category show preserves all small limits. For , verify the bounded subfunctor solution set for precomposition. Choose an infinite cardinal number at least as large as the number of -morphisms and . Given , setPostcomposition makes a subfunctor, each value has cardinality at most , and factors through . After labelling its values by subsets of , only a set of possibilities for and exists. Their maps into give the required weakly initial set. Thus has a left adjoint.
It is the left Kan extension. The left Kan extension as a comma-category colimit makes it concrete:Every representative maps under to . The colimit identifications and naturality make this well-defined, giving exactly .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2005 iii Paper 26 6 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
A preadditive category has an abelian group of morphisms between each pair of objects, and composition is additive in both variables. An additive category is a preadditive category with a zero object and finite products in a category; equivalently one may require finite coproducts. The equivalence, and the stronger assertion that these constructions agree canonically, follow from the argument below. An abelian category is an additive category with kernels in a category and cokernels in a category, in which every monomorphism is a categorical kernel and every epimorphism is a categorical cokernel. A monomorphism with the first property is a normal monomorphism; an epimorphism with the second is a conormal epimorphism.
Let , with projections . There is a unique with , interpreting the other components as zero. Since every sends to , the product's universal property givesGiven arrows , put . Then . Conversely any arrow with these restrictions equals , so it is uniquely this sum. Thus is a coproduct in a category. The empty product is the zero object and also the empty coproduct. The dual argument starts from coproducts and constructs projections; it proves the equivalent definition. Hence finite products and coproducts are the same biproducts, with the displayed identities giving the canonical identification.
For the image factorization in an abelian category, let , let be its cokernel, and let be the kernel of . Since , write . We prove that is epic. Suppose satisfies and let be its categorical kernel. Then for some . The composite is monic and hence is a normal monomorphism, say for . Since , the categorical cokernel property makes factor through , and therefore . The categorical kernel property of gives with . Cancellation of yields ; since is monic this also gives . Thus is invertible and . In a preadditive category, now implies , hence . This proves is an epimorphism and supplies the required factorization.
For uniqueness, an epimorphism that is a categorical cokernel is the categorical cokernel of its own categorical kernel. Indeed, if and , then factors through ; an arrow killing therefore kills and factors uniquely through . Dually, a normal monomorphism is the categorical kernel of its own categorical cokernel. If is any epi–mono factorization, monicity of gives . Both and are consequently categorical cokernels of this same categorical kernel. Their universal properties give a unique isomorphism between the intermediate objects with , and cancellation of gives . Therefore the epi–mono factorization is unique up to the unique compatible isomorphism.
Here is an additive category with truncated primary torsion, with the prime fixed as . Its objects are finitely generated abelian groups having no element of order , and its morphisms are all group homomorphisms. Equivalently their -primary torsion subgroup has exponent at most . It is a full subcategory of abelian groups, closed under finite direct sums and subgroups. Its hom groups and bilinear composition are inherited, and the zero group and finite direct sums belong to it, so it is additive. Categorical kernels are ordinary subgroup categorical kernels, which are still finitely generated and have no element of order .
To construct categorical cokernels, for an arbitrary finitely generated abelian group let be its -primary torsion subgroup, and defineThe Fundamental theorem of finitely generated abelian groups shows that this quotient lies in the subcategory: it leaves the free and odd-primary parts unchanged and replaces each cyclic -primary summand by either or . Every homomorphism to an allowed group kills , because it sends -primary torsion into a subgroup killed by . Thus has the universal property of a reflection. For , its categorical cokernel in the subcategory isThis has exactly the categorical cokernel universal property by the preceding factorization. Finite categorical limits exist because equalizers are categorical kernels of differences and finite products exist. Finite colimits exist dually because coequalizers are categorical cokernels of differences and finite coproducts exist.
The epimorphisms in this example are precisely the surjective homomorphisms. A surjection is epic already in abelian groups. Conversely, if is epic in the subcategory, its categorical cokernel is zero, so . A nonzero finitely generated abelian group has nonzero reflection: a nonzero free or odd-primary summand survives, and a nonzero finite -primary summand has a nonzero quotient modulo twice itself. Hence and is surjective. Its ordinary categorical kernel belongs to the subcategory, and its quotient by that categorical kernel is its codomain, which also belongs to the subcategory. It is therefore the categorical cokernel of its categorical kernel. This proves that every epimorphism is conormal.
The monomorphismis not normal. Its categorical cokernel in this category is reduction modulo , since . The categorical kernel of that categorical cokernel is the inclusion , whereas the image of is . A normal monomorphism is the categorical kernel of its own categorical cokernel, as proved above, so cannot be normal. In fact multiplication by is itself the categorical kernel of reduction modulo , up to the identification . Its composite with itself is multiplication by . Thus this example already exhibits two normal monomorphisms whose composite is not normal.
For the general assertion, let be a nonnormal monomorphism in any additive category of the specified kind. Put and be its categorical kernel, and factor . Both and are monic, so is monic. Set and be its categorical kernel. Then are normal, and for some .
Suppose their composite were normal, say . Since , factors through , whence . The categorical kernel property of supplies with ; cancellation shows , and monicity makes an isomorphism. Because , this forces . In a preadditive category, vanishing of the categorical cokernel of implies that is epic: any with have factor through the zero categorical cokernel. By hypothesis is therefore a categorical cokernel, and it is also monic. If , monicity and force ; a categorical cokernel of a zero arrow is an isomorphism. Thus is invertible, making normal, a contradiction. Consequently normal monomorphisms cannot be closed under composition in any such category; the explicit pair witnesses the failure.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2009 iii Paper 23 1 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Let be a finite diagram. Form the finite categorical productsThere are two morphisms : their components at are and , respectively. Let be their equaliser. Then satisfy , so they constitute a cone over a diagram.
Any other cone uniquely determines . Its cone equations say precisely that . The equaliser therefore gives a unique with , and thus . Conversely these component equations force by the categorical product universal property, so there is exactly one such mediator. This proves that is a categorical limit of .
The empty categorical products are included: if is empty, and are terminal and the construction gives the empty categorical limit. Thus finite categorical products and equalisers give every finite categorical limit, as a special case of the construction of small limits from products and equalizers.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2009 iii Paper 23 2 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Write an object of the slice category as . Its morphisms are arrows in commuting with these structure maps, and the forgetful functor removes the structure map.
Suppose a square in the slice becomes a pullback square in , with vertex . Given a compatible pair of slice arrows and , the underlying pullback gives a unique with the required projection equations. If is one projection, thenwhere is the structure map. Thus is automatically a slice morphism, and underlying uniqueness gives uniqueness in the slice. Hence reflects pullbacks.
Now let be an equaliser of slice arrows . Consider any underlying arrow with . Give the structure map . Then is a slice arrow into , and the slice equaliser gives a unique with . Conversely any underlying with that equation automatically obeys , so there are no additional factorization possibilities outside the slice. Therefore has the ordinary equaliser universal property in . This proves preserves equalisers.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2009 iii Paper 23 3 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Write . The category of elements of a categorical presheaf has objects with ; a morphism is satisfying . It is a small category because is small and each is a set. Consider the diagram sending to and to the natural transformation given by postcomposition with .
There is a canonical cocone withFunctoriality makes it a natural transformation, and the equation makes these transformations a cocone.
To prove its universal property, let be any categorical presheaf with a compatible cocone . DefineFor and , compatibility with the arrow givesThus is natural. Naturality of each shows . Conversely any transformation with these equations must have the displayed values , so it is unique. We have proved the canonical colimit presentation of a presheaf:
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2009 iii Paper 23 3 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
A Cartesian closed category has finite categorical products and, for every , an exponential object with an evaluation morphism such that composition with evaluation gives natural bijectionsFinite categorical products in the presheaf category are pointwise; in particular its terminal object is the constant singleton categorical presheaf. For categorical presheaves defineFor , restriction sends to . Composition and identity laws follow from those of the Yoneda embedding, so this is a categorical presheaf.
Define evaluation at by . For , naturality of gives , which is the evaluation of the restricted pair. Hence evaluation is a natural transformation.
Given , its currying sends to the transformation whose component at isNaturality in follows from that of , and naturality in follows by composing with the relevant arrow. Evaluating at recovers . Conversely, if , naturality of along says that evaluating at gives . Thus currying the evaluation of recovers . These constructions are inverse and natural, proving the universal property. This is the exponential in a presheaf category, and proves the presheaf category is Cartesian closed.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2009 iii Paper 23 4 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
The Yoneda embedding sends to the representable presheaf . On a morphism , it sends a map to , giving .
The Yoneda lemma states that for every categorical presheaf there is a bijection, natural in both variables,Its inverse sends to the transformation . Apply it to to obtainUnder this bijection corresponds exactly to , so the map induced by the embedding on each hom-set is bijective. Therefore the Yoneda embedding is full and faithful.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2009 iii Paper 23 6 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
The Freyd general adjoint functor theorem is as follows. Let , with a complete category which is locally small. Then has a left adjoint if and only if it preserves all small categorical limits and satisfies the solution-set condition: for each , there is a set-indexed familysuch that every can be written for some and some . The target category need not be complete. We prove all the existence steps.
First establish the initial-object lemma for complete categories with a weakly initial set. Let be locally small and complete, with a weakly initial set , meaning every object receives a map from at least one . Its categorical product is weakly initial: compose a categorical product projection with the map from the appropriate . Local smallness makes a set. Let be the simultaneous equaliser of every endomorphism of and the identity. Explicitly it is the equaliser of the two arrowswith components and . Thus for every endomorphism , and is monic.
Every object receives a morphism from , by composing with a map . To prove uniqueness, take parallel maps and their equaliser . Weak initiality of gives . The composite is an endomorphism of , so . Cancelling the monomorphism gives . Hence is both monic and a split epimorphism, and is therefore invertible. Since , this forces . We have proved is initial, without using a class-sized categorical product or equaliser.
For sufficiency in the theorem, fix and consider the comma category . Its objects are pairs ; a morphism satisfies . This category is locally small because each hom-set is a subset of . It is complete: for a small diagram of such pairs, take the underlying categorical limit in . The arrows from form a cone to its image under , and preservation of the categorical limit gives a unique inducing them. The same universal property gives all mediators in the comma category. The solution-set family is a weakly initial set in this comma category, so the lemma supplies an initial pairFor , initiality defines a unique satisfying . Uniqueness proves the identity and composition laws, making a functor. Initiality also gives bijectionsThe definition of proves naturality in , and postcomposition proves naturality in . These bijections are the required adjunction .
For necessity, if , the single arrow is a solution set: the transpose of any gives its factorization through . If is a limiting cone vertex of a small diagram in , then, naturally in ,These are the canonical cone-factorization bijections, so with its image projections is a categorical limit of . Thus preserves all small categorical limits, completing both directions of the theorem.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2009 iii Paper 23 7 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
A monad on consists of an endofunctor and natural transformations and satisfying, at every object ,These are the unit and associativity laws for the unit and multiplication of a monad.
An algebra for a monad is a pair with satisfyingA monad algebra morphism is a morphism with . Identities satisfy this condition, and composing two such maps preserves it by functoriality of . The resulting Eilenberg-Moore category is denoted . Its forgetful functor sends to and leaves the underlying arrows unchanged.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2009 iii Paper 23 7 c Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Define the free algebra functor byThe monad laws say precisely that defines an monad algebra structure on , while naturality of makes an monad algebra morphism. We construct the adjunction explicitly.
For an monad algebra and a morphism , put . It is an monad algebra morphism becauseConversely, from an monad algebra morphism obtain . These operations are inverse: naturality of and the monad algebra unit law giveand the algebra-morphism equation together with the monad unit law givesThe formulas commute with precomposition in and composition with monad algebra morphisms in , so the bijections are natural. Therefore the free-forgetful Eilenberg-Moore adjunction isIts unit is and its counit at is the monad algebra action .