If a transcendental meromorphic function had only finitely many simple preimages over each of five distinct finite values, their simple counting functions would be . The displayed multiplicity inequality and the Nevanlinna first main theorem would bound the truncated sum by . The Nevanlinna second main theorem requires at least up to its error, a contradiction. Thus at least one value has infinitely many simple preimages; four other values can remain totally ramified.
The growth order of a meromorphic function is the upper power exponent of its Nevanlinna characteristic, with constants assigned order zero. It is different from the local signed order at a zero or pole. A Nevanlinna integrated counting function has an analogous growth order. The Nevanlinna first main theorem bounds every counting order by the function order.
Nevanlinna deficiency 2026-10-14
For a nonconstant meromorphic function, its deficiency at a point of the Riemann sphere is the displayed asymptotic proportion missing from the full Nevanlinna integrated counting function. The Nevanlinna first main theorem bounds by and identifies deficiency with the lower limiting normalized proximity. An omitted value has deficiency one.
Nevanlinna theory 2026-10-14
Nevanlinna theory studies the growth and value distribution of meromorphic functions through their integrated pole counts and logarithmic proximity to target values. The Nevanlinna characteristic combines both quantities, while the Nevanlinna first main theorem compares it with the corresponding counts and proximity for any fixed target.
Use the Nevanlinna proximity function and the Nevanlinna integrated counting function for poles, counting multiplicity. If the pole order at zero is , then
Boundedness of the Nevanlinna characteristic refers to , equivalently to a uniform bound on for any fixed . This avoids the harmless origin normalization when .
The Nevanlinna first main theorem states, for every fixed finite value and every nonconstant meromorphic function on the disk,
For , this is the definition of . The error is bounded independently of . Translation changes by , while Jensen's formula gives when near zero; these observations explain the first theorem.
The Nevanlinna second main theorem in the unit disc states that for distinct values on the Riemann sphere,
as outside an exceptional set satisfying . The truncated Nevanlinna counting function counts each distinct preimage once. The boundary-distance error cannot simply be suppressed: on the disk it need not be . The disk error and exceptional-set estimates follow from the logarithmic-derivative estimates in mathweb.tifr.res.in/Documents/Publications/Lectures/tifr17.pdf .
Suppose first that is bounded. Since , its poles satisfy the Blaschke condition, counting their orders: let in their integrated count and use . Let be their Blaschke product, including the origin factor if necessary. Then extends to a holomorphic function on the whole disk, and gives
Here the last bound follows from bounded and the uniform lower bound on .
The nonnegative subharmonic function has a finite harmonic majorant. Indeed its Poisson integrals on expanding disks dominate it by the maximum principle for subharmonic functions, increase with , and have . The Harnack inequality for harmonic functions bounds them on every compact subdisk, so their increasing limit is a finite harmonic function . Since the disk is simply connected, has a harmonic conjugate, giving a holomorphic function with . Consequently
This proves the constructive half of the quotient characterization of bounded characteristic.
Conversely, if with bounded holomorphic functions and , each pole of is a zero of of at least the same order. The elementary inequality and the Nevanlinna first main theorem give
Any cancellation at an origin zero contributes only a bounded multiple of on , which is included in this . The zero function is immediate; constant nonzero is handled directly. Thus bounded characteristic is exactly a quotient of two bounded analytic functions.
An unbounded example with bounded characteristic is
It is a ratio of the bounded holomorphic functions and . More explicitly, Jensen's formula gives the mean of as zero, so , although .
Finally, set . Pointwise . Jensen's inequality for the concave logarithm gives
There is no pole term because is holomorphic. Hence the stated integral bound implies bounded characteristic. This argument in fact works for every .
For a nonconstant meromorphic map, write in the usual normalization, where . Let count -points with their local degrees, and let count each distinct point once, using the same integrated logarithmic weights. At infinity the local degree is the pole order. The Nevanlinna deficiency and Nevanlinna ramification index are
The latter is an asymptotic excess-multiplicity index, not the integer local ramification degree. The Nevanlinna first main theorem gives and identifies deficiency with the lower limiting normalized proximity. The target ranges over the Riemann sphere, not just the real line.
The exponential is entire and has no poles. Consequently
Thus in this normalization.
To obtain the rational-composition growth, represent the nonconstant degree- sphere map by relatively prime homogeneous polynomials of degree . Their joint norm on the unit sphere in has a positive minimum and finite maximum: simultaneous vanishing would contradict relative primeness on the projective line. Homogeneity therefore gives constants with
Apply this to the entire nonvanishing lift . The logarithmic joint norm differs from by a bounded function. Its circular mean minus the value at zero is the spherical characteristic. It differs from the ordinary characteristic by : Jensen's formula applied to the entire denominator counts its zeros, while
controls the proximity replacement. If the denominator vanishes at zero, factor its zero and use its leading coefficient in Jensen's formula; the discrepancy is still a basepoint-dependent constant. This proves the rational composition law for the Nevanlinna characteristic here and gives
If is constant, and its characteristic is bounded instead.
For a simultaneous nonzero deficiency and ramification example choose
a degree-three polynomial composed with the exponential. Its characteristic is . Its only zeros are , , all of multiplicity two. The number of distinct such points in a large disc is , so integration of their count gives
The origin contribution is handled by its usual logarithmic counting term. Therefore
This is simultaneous deficiency and ramification for an exponential polynomial: the missing exponential value contributes a deficit, while the attained value is attained with double multiplicity.
Write . The Nevanlinna proximity function and Nevanlinna integrated counting function are
The pole sum counts multiplicity; it is finite for each because is finite and nonzero and poles of a meromorphic function are isolated. Equivalently , where counts poles in the disc. The Nevanlinna characteristic is
For a general nonzero meromorphic function with signed order at zero, use , . The general counting convention includes a pole at zero:
where . This convention will also cover when the target .
Here is a direct proof of the exact reciprocal identity underlying the Nevanlinna first main theorem. Choose a circle with no zero or pole of on it, and a slightly larger disc with the same interior zeros and poles. Divide by and its nonzero zero factors and multiply by its nonzero pole factors, obtaining a holomorphic, nowhere-zero function on that disc. For any factor with ,
Indeed, factor out ; the remaining logarithm has real part equal to that of , whose angular mean is zero. Also, is harmonic, so the mean value property for harmonic functions equates its circle mean to . Putting back the zero and pole factors proves
The identity now yields
Zeros or poles on the circle cause only integrable logarithmic singularities; the same identities hold at those radii by limits. A boundary zero or pole contributes to its counting term.
For a finite target , set . Its finite poles and their orders equal those of . The elementary estimates
give . Combining this with the reciprocal identity proves the first main theorem:
The error is bounded independently of , with an explicit bound , where is the first nonzero local coefficient of at zero. The count on the right records the occurrences of the value with multiplicity. The target infinity is the defining identity . If is a constant equal to , the reciprocal expression is undefined; the value-distribution assertion assumes , as it automatically does for nonconstant . The exact reciprocal identity remains valid for every nonzero constant .
Taking , whose signed order is zero and whose local coefficient is , rearranges that exact identity into Jensen's formula:
Thus the zero and pole terms, their signs and the initial-value constant follow from the same proved identity, rather than from a theorem citation without proof.
Finally let be a nonzero bounded holomorphic function on the unit disc, with . If its order at zero is , write , . The factorization argument above works on every compact subdisc and gives, for its nonzero zeros,
For this is a uniform finite upper bound. As , monotone convergence gives
Since for , and there are only zeros at zero, we obtain
This is precisely the Blaschke condition, so the zeros, counted with multiplicity, form a Blaschke sequence.
A meromorphic function on the unit disc has bounded characteristic if and only if it has this representation. Its pole Blaschke product makes analytic with bounded positive logarithmic means. The least harmonic majorant by expanding disk lifts gives . A harmonic conjugate gives an analytic with , so and are bounded. Conversely the Nevanlinna first main theorem bounds the characteristic of by that of and , hence by a constant.