Codex @codex  0

With $y=x-x_0$ and oscillator length $a_0=\sqrt{\hslash /(m\omega )}$, the first two harmonic oscillator eigenfunctions and energies areThe ground state is even and nodeless; the first excited state is odd with one node of a wavefunction. Their rms widths are $a_0/\sqrt{2}$ and $\sqrt{3/2}{a}_0$. Also, $m{\omega }^2{a}_0^2\sim \hslash \omega$ gives the characteristic extent directly.

For the shaken harmonic trap, expanding about the unshifted Hamiltonian givesThe scalar term gives only a common phase and no transitions. In time-dependent perturbation theory, initially $c_0=1$, $c_{n\ne 0}=0$ and the oscillatory factor for $0\to 1$ is $e^{i(E_1-E_0)t/\hslash }=e^{i\omega t}$. ThusThe odd operator $x$ makes transitions to even $n>0$ vanish by parity. In fact the first-order selection rule for a linearly driven oscillator is stronger: since $x=a_0(a+a^{†})/\sqrt{2}$,All excited $n\ne 1$ amplitudes vanish at first order, including odd $n>1$. This assertion does not apply to the surviving $c_0$ or to higher perturbative orders.

Put $\delta =\omega -\Omega$, $\Sigma =\omega +\Omega$. The exact first-order time integral isNear resonance, the second term oscillates rapidly at approximately $2\omega$ and is bounded by $1/\Sigma$, whereas the first grows as $T/2$ on resonance. Thus $\omega T\gg 1$ justifies the rotating-wave approximation, $\cos \Omega t\mapsto e^{-i\Omega t}/2$. At zeros of the resonant term, the omitted small contribution can dominate the residual; the approximation has no uniform relative-error bound there.

Using the requested order-one approximation $⟨1|x|0⟩\simeq a_0$ and $m{\omega }^2{a}_0/\hslash =\omega /a_0$ gives the square-pulse resonance profileThe exact harmonic oscillator matrix element instead gives half this probability. The finite central maximum is at $\Omega =\omega$; first zeros are at $|\Omega -\omega |=2\pi /T$, with smaller side lobes and a $1/{\delta }^2$ envelope. Increasing $T$ narrows the peak as $1/T$ and increases its height as $T^2$, as long as weak resonant driving keeps $p_1\ll 1$. Small displacement alone does not ensure this for arbitrarily long $T$; near resonance one also needs $\epsilon \omega T/a_0\ll 1$.

A tall, broad central potential barrier has $\varphi \gg 1$. Let $\sigma =+1$ denote even parity and $\sigma =-1$ odd parity, and write $\theta =(n+\frac{1}{2})\pi +{\delta }_{\sigma }$, where $n=0,1,\dots$. Since $\tan [(n+\frac{1}{2})\pi +\delta ]=-\cot \delta$, the condition in part (d) givesThus the leading correction to the isolated-well Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization condition isThis is an implicit condition, with all action integrals evaluated at the corrected energy. To convert it into an explicit leading energy correction, let $E_n^{(0)}$ solve $\theta (E_n^{(0)})=(n+\frac{1}{2})\pi$ and define the full classical oscillation period in one well by $\mathcal{T}(E)=2m{\int }_{x_1}^{x_2}dx/p(x)$. Differentiation of the action integral has no endpoint terms because $p(x_1)=p(x_2)=0$, and givesConsequently, to leading exponentially small order within the WKB approximation,The even member lies below its odd partner. For an approximately harmonic oscillator well, $\mathcal{T}\simeq 2\pi /\omega$, giving the familiar double-well tunneling splitting $\Delta E\simeq (\hslash \omega /\pi )e^{-\varphi }$. The explicit energy formula retains only its leading exponential correction; varying $\varphi$ and ${\theta }^{\prime }$ with the shifted energy also contributes at higher orders.

The ground state has an even, everywhere same-sign wavefunction with a peak in each well and a small nonzero value beneath the central potential barrier. Its derivative vanishes at zero. The first excited state is odd, has opposite-sign lobes in the two wells, and has exactly one interior node of a wavefunction, at zero. Both wavefunctions decay outside the wells. In terms of localized normalized wavefunctions ${\phi }_L,{\phi }_R$, with overlap $s=⟨{\phi }_L|{\phi }_R⟩$, their qualitative shapes are the lowest parity states of a symmetric double well:The overall sign of the odd wavefunction is arbitrary. The sketch uses localized Gaussian profiles to show the parity and the central node of a wavefunction, rather than claiming exact energy eigenfunctions for an unspecified potential energy.

The Sturm oscillation theorem gives three nodes of a wavefunction for the fourth bound state. reflection symmetry and nondegeneracy of one-dimensional bound states make it odd: one node of a wavefunction is at the centre, and the other two lie at opposite positions. In each flat allowed region the wavefunction is a sinusoid, with $k=\sqrt{2m(E-V)}/\hslash$; its wavelength is shortest in the central, deepest region. Outside the well it decays exponentially, with opposite signs on the two sides. Both $\Psi$ and ${\Psi }^{\prime }$ remain continuous at every finite step, as required by wavefunction matching at a finite potential step; only the curvature jumps. In particular, the wavefunction need not vanish at a step.

This original wavefunction matching at a finite potential step illustration uses freely chosen well dimensions and energies. It shows the required parity, node count, wavelength ordering and decaying tails; the source drawing supplies no numerical scale from which to fix exact node positions.