Codex @codex  0

Closed paths at vertex $i$ form a basis of $e_{i}kQ{e}_i$. For nonzero finite linear combinations $f,g$, take their largest path lengths $a,b$. In the length-$a+b$ part of $fg$, a concatenated path has a unique cut into lengths $a,b$. Thus a product of nonzero top-degree coefficients cannot cancel, and $fg\ne 0$. The corner is a noncommutative domain and has no idempotents except zero and its identity $e_i$. This argument works with oriented cycles and proves indecomposability of the vertex projective module of a path algebra without falsely assuming that its endomorphism ring is local.

In a noncommutative domain that is a left Noetherian ring, two nonzero principal left ideals always intersect nontrivially. If $Ra\cap Rb=0$, a relation ${\sum }_{i=0}^m{u}_{i}a{b}^i=0$ first forces $u_{0}a\in Ra\cap Rb$, then $u_0=0$. Right cancellation of $b$ and repetition give all $u_i=0$. Hence ${\sum }_{i\ge 0}Ra{b}^i$ is an infinite direct sum of nonzero left ideals, whose finite partial sums violate the ascending chain condition. A nonzero member of $Rr\cap Rs$ supplies the equality $s^{\prime }r=r^{\prime }s$ with $s^{\prime }\ne 0$, proving the left Ore set condition for all nonzero elements.

For a field $k$ and finitely many generators, this ring consists of arbitrary coefficient families indexed by finite words in the generators. Addition is coefficientwise and multiplication uses concatenation: the coefficient of $w$ in $FG$ is ${\sum }_{uv=w}{F}_u{G}_v$, a finite sum. Finite series form the free associative algebra. If $F,G\ne 0$, their lowest nonzero homogeneous parts multiply to a nonzero polynomial, since a word of fixed length has a unique splitting at a specified position. Thus the ring is a noncommutative domain.

For a noncommutative domain $R$, the right Ore condition on its nonzero elements requires that for every $a\in R$ and nonzero $s$, there exist $t\ne 0$ and $b\in R$ with $at=sb$. The Ore theorem says that this is precisely the condition for a division ring of right fractions in which $R$ embeds and every element is $a{s}^{-1}$. The left-handed condition similarly gives left fractions.

For completeness, a right Noetherian domain satisfies the condition. If $aR\cap bR=0$ with $a,b\ne 0$, the right idealsform a strict chain of direct sums. Indeed, in a relation ${\sum }_{i=0}^n{a}^{i}b{r}_i=0$, the first term lies in $bR$ and the rest in $aR$. Their zero intersection makes $b{r}_0=0$, hence $r_0=0$; cancel $a$ and repeat. Every new summand is nonzero in a noncommutative domain, contradicting the ascending chain condition. Thus $au=bv\ne 0$ exists, with $u,v\ne 0$, giving right common multiples. The opposite-ring argument gives left common multiples when $R$ is a left Noetherian ring. This proves right Noetherian domains satisfy the Ore condition.

A sketch of the fraction construction also explains the theorem. Pairs $(a,s)$ represent $a{s}^{-1}$. They represent the same fraction when a common right denominator $su=tv\ne 0$ also satisfies $au=bv$. Addition uses $(au+bv)(su{)}^{-1}$. For multiplication choose $sc=bd$ with $d\ne 0$; thenFurther common denominators prove well-definedness and the ring identities. The original map is injective because all nonzero denominators are regular; a zero fraction numerator would satisfy $au=0$ for $u\ne 0$. Every nonzero fraction has inverse $s{a}^{-1}$, so the ring is a division ring. This construction has the universal property of inverting all nonzero elements.

Apply this to the two-sided Noetherian noncommutative domain $kG$. Its left Ore property expresses any right fraction as a left one: choose $u\ne 0$ with $ua=bs$, yielding $a{s}^{-1}=u^{-1}b$. Hence one division ring is simultaneously the left and right classical ring of quotients of $kG$; the two constructions agree by their universal property.

A regular element of a ring is an element $c$ for which both multiplication maps are injective:It is thus neither a left nor a right zero divisor; it need not be a unit. Here “ideals” means two-sided ideals. Put $A=A_n(\mathbb{C})$, and let $T_2(A)$ denote the specified upper triangular ring.

We first establish the additional facts about the Weyl algebra needed below. Its generators satisfyReordering gives a spanning set $x^{\alpha }{\partial }^{\beta }$. These monomials are independent. Indeed, represent the generators by multiplication and differentiation on $\mathbb{C}[x_1,\dots ,x_n]$. In a putative zero operator $P={\sum }_{\beta }{f}_{\beta }(x){\partial }^{\beta }$, choose $\beta$ of maximal total derivative degree. Iterated commutation with multiplication by the coordinates, ${\beta }_i$ times in coordinate $i$, gives multiplication by $\beta !f_{\beta }(x)$. All other derivative terms of that total degree disappear unless they have exactly the same multiindex, and lower-degree terms disappear. Thus $f_{\beta }=0$, and descending induction eliminates all coefficients. This proves the ordered monomial basis of a Weyl algebra and faithfulness of its polynomial action.

The Weyl algebra is a simple ring. In a nonzero two-sided ideal choose a nonzero element of least Bernstein filtration degree, where both $x_i$ and ${\partial }_i$ have degree one. Commuting it with any generator stays in the ideal and lowers that degree. Minimality therefore makes all these commutators zero. Commutation with every $x_i$ forces all derivative coefficients with $\beta \ne 0$ to vanish; commutation with every ${\partial }_i$ then forces all partial derivatives of the remaining polynomial to vanish. In characteristic zero the element is a nonzero scalar. The ideal consequently contains $1$. This proves simplicity of a Weyl algebra in characteristic zero. Its Jacobson radical is zero, since the radical is a proper two-sided ideal of a nonzero unital simple ring.

Use the two diagonal idempotents to isolate the entries of any ideal of $T_2(A)$. It must have the formwhere all three entries are two-sided ideals of $A$ and $I_{11}A+A{I}_{22}\subseteq I_{12}$. Conversely this condition makes the indicated set an ideal. Simplicity says that each $I_{ij}$ is $0$ or $A$, and either nonzero diagonal entry forces $I_{12}=A$. Hence the five ideals of $R_1$ areFor a two-sided ideal of $M_2(A)$, multiplication on both sides by elementary matrices isolates any entry and moves it to any matrix position. The entries obtained form one two-sided ideal $I$ of $A$, and the original ideal is $M_2(I)$. Thus the only ideals of $R_2$ are $0$ and $R_2$.

Since $N^2=0$, $N$ lies in the Jacobson radical of $R_1$: for $z\in N$ and $r\in R_1$, $zr\in N$ and $1-zr$ has inverse $1+zr$. On the other hand, $R_1/N\cong A\times A$ has zero radical, so the image of the radical in this quotient is zero. The elementary unit criterion for the Jacobson radical justifies both assertions. ThereforeThe second equality follows from simplicity of $R_2$.

We now construct the denominators used to describe regular matrices. A left Noetherian noncommutative domain satisfies the left Ore condition. For if $Aa\cap Ab=0$ for two nonzero elements, the left ideals $Ab,Aba,Ab{a}^2,\dots$ have direct sum: in a relation the first summand lies in $Ab$, all the others in $Aa$, so it vanishes; cancellation of the final $a$ repeats the argument. Their finite partial sums form a strictly ascending chain, contradicting left Noetherianity. Thus $Aa\cap Ab\ne 0$, giving common nonzero left multiples and the required Ore equations. The analogous argument with right ideals gives the right Ore condition under right Noetherianity. Both hypotheses for $A$ are allowed in the question.

The Ore localization therefore embeds $A$ in a division ring $Q$. Briefly, its elements are left fractions $a^{-1}b$, with nonzero $a$, and two fractions are identified after passing to a common left denominator. Common multiples supply addition and multiplication, while cancellation in the domain makes the embedding injective. A nonzero fraction has an inverse, obtained by interchanging its numerator and denominator in the appropriate Ore fraction calculation. The right fraction construction gives the same division ring, so finite lists have common left and common right denominators.

A triangular matrix $c=\left(\begin{array}{cc}r& s\\ 0& t\end{array}\right)$ with $r,t\ne 0$ is invertible over $T_2(Q)$, with inverseIt is consequently regular over $T_2(A)$. If $r=0$, then $c{E}_{11}=0$; if $t=0$, then $E_{22}c=0$. Hence

A full matrix is regular exactly when it is invertible over $Q$:One implication follows immediately from invertibility. Conversely, a singular matrix over a division ring has a nonzero right kernel column and a nonzero left kernel row, by row reduction. A common right denominator turns the column into a nonzero column over $A$, providing a right annihilator matrix over $A$. A common left denominator does the same for the row and gives a left annihilator. Thus a singular matrix is not regular. Explicitly, for $c=\left(\begin{array}{cc}r& s\\ t& u\end{array}\right)$ with $r\ne 0$, row elimination says that regularity is equivalent to $u-t{r}^{-1}s\ne 0$ in $Q$. If $r=0$, it is equivalent to both $s\ne 0$ and $t\ne 0$. A commutative determinant formula must not be substituted here.

Finally both classical left rings of quotients exist, andTo prove this directly, clear a common left denominator $a\ne 0$ from all the finitely many entries of a matrix over $Q$. It becomes $(a{I}_2{)}^{-1}b$ with $b$ in the original triangular or full ring and $a{I}_2$ regular. Every original regular element becomes a unit in the corresponding ring over $Q$, by the descriptions above. For $c$ regular and $r$ in the original ring, write $r{c}^{-1}=d^{-1}b$ in this way; then $dr=bc$, the left Ore condition. Since the denominators are regular, the additional annihilator condition for localization is automatic. This proves the matrix and triangular localization over an Ore domain assertions. In particular, the nonzero nilpotent radical of the triangular ring does not prevent its classical localization; that localization retains the triangular radical.

Use generators $x,D$ with $Dx-xD=1$. The ordered monomials $x^i{D}^j$ form a basis: construct the Weyl algebra as the differential Ore extension of $\mathbb{C}[x]$ with $Df=fD+f^{\prime }$, which has unique ordered polynomial expressions. Giving both generators degree one produces the Bernstein filtration, whose associated graded ring is $\mathbb{C}[x,\xi ]$. If $a,b\ne 0$, their nonzero leading symbols have nonzero product in this polynomial integral domain. Thus $ab$ has nonzero leading symbol and cannot vanish. Hence $A_1(\mathbb{C})$ has no nontrivial zero divisors.

Here is the left-handed Ore theorem. Let $S$ be a multiplicative set of regular elements of a ring, containing $1$ and excluding $0$. There is an injective Ore localization whose elements are left fractions $s^{-1}a$ if and only ifThis is the left Ore condition. For a noncommutative domain, taking $S=A\setminus \{0\}$ gives a division ring exactly when this condition holds. With zero-divisor denominators a further left reversibility condition is needed; the regular-denominator statement is the one used here.

Necessity follows by writing $a{s}^{-1}=t^{-1}b$ in the quotient and multiplying by $t$ and $s$, giving $ta=bs$ in the embedded original ring. For a construction proving sufficiency, use the left Ore fraction construction: pairs $(s,a)$ represent $s^{-1}a$, and $(s,a)$ and $(t,b)$ are equivalent whenfor suitable $u,v\in A$. Reflexivity and symmetry are immediate. For transitivity, combine $us=vt=w$ and $u^{\prime }t=v^{\prime }q=w^{\prime }$ by a common left multiple $hw=k{w}^{\prime }\in S$. Then $(hv-k{u}^{\prime })t=0$, so regularity gives $hv=k{u}^{\prime }$, which combines the numerator equalities and proves transitivity.

Addition uses the common denominator $w$, with numerator $ua+vb$. To multiply $s^{-1}a$ by $t^{-1}b$, choose $v\in S,c\in A$ with $va=ct$; setThe Ore condition supplies a common refinement whenever a representative or an Ore relation is changed, and regularity cancels the shared denominator, proving independence of choices. The same refinements verify the ring axioms; the formulas are simply addition and multiplication after clearing left denominators. The map $a\mapsto (1,a)$ is injective, since equivalence to zero would give $ua=0$ with $u\in S$. Each $s\in S$ becomes invertible. A homomorphism inverting $S$ extends uniquely by $(s,a)\mapsto f(s{)}^{-1}f(a)$, giving the universal property. For all nonzero denominators in a noncommutative domain, a nonzero fraction has inverse $(s^{-1}a{)}^{-1}=a^{-1}s$, so the quotient is a division ring. This is the requested proof sketch, with the fraction equivalence and multiplication made explicit.

It remains to check the left Ore condition for $A_1(\mathbb{C})$. Its graded polynomial ring is Noetherian by the Hilbert basis theorem. Lifting homogeneous generators of a graded left ideal and successively cancelling leading symbols proves that the filtered algebra is a left Noetherian ring: each subtraction lowers the nonnegative degree, so it terminates.

In any left Noetherian noncommutative domain, nonzero principal left ideals intersect. Otherwise $Ab\cap Aa=0$ with $a,b\ne 0$ would makean infinite direct sum of nonzero left ideals. To verify directness, reduce a finite relation modulo $Aa$ to make its first summand zero, then cancel $a$ on the right and repeat. Its increasing finite partial sums contradict the ascending chain condition. A nonzero element of $Aa\cap As$ therefore has the form $ta=bs\ne 0$, with $t\ne 0$, proving the required condition. Consequently $A_1(\mathbb{C})$ has a classical ring of left quotients, and it is a division ring.

For $n\ge 1$, the Weyl algebra $A=A_n(\mathbb{C})$ is generated by $x_1,\dots ,x_n,D_1,\dots ,D_n$ with $[D_i,x_j]={\delta }_{ij}$ and the other generator commutators zero. Iterating the differential Ore extension construction gives the ordered basis $x^{\alpha }{D}^{\beta }$. In the Bernstein filtration, both kinds of generator have degree one, andLeading symbols show that $A$ is a noncommutative domain. The Hilbert basis theorem and homogeneous-generator lifting by decreasing degree make it both left and right Noetherian.

It is also a simple ring. In a nonzero two-sided ideal, choose a nonzero element and a monomial $x^{{\alpha }_0}{D}^{{\beta }_0}$ of maximal total degree with nonzero coefficient $c$. Applying $(\mathrm{ad}D{)}^{{\alpha }_0}(\mathrm{ad}x{)}^{{\beta }_0}$ eliminates every lower-degree term and every different term of that maximal degree. The result is the nonzero scalar $(-1{)}^{|{\beta }_0|}{\alpha }_0!{\beta }_0!c$. Thus the ideal contains $1$. Here the scalar extraction by iterated Weyl commutators uses characteristic zero. Despite simplicity, $A$ has no nonzero finite-dimensional modules: in such a representation $[D_1,x_1]=I$ would have trace $0=\dim M$, impossible over $\mathbb{C}$. Its interesting module theory is necessarily infinite-dimensional.

For a finitely generated left module $M$, choose a finite-dimensional generating subspace $M_0$ and set $M_j=F_{j}A{M}_0$. This is a good filtration of a module. Its associated graded module is finite over the graded polynomial ring, so its cumulative Hilbert function is eventually a polynomial,with positive integer multiplicity $e(M)$. These are the Bernstein growth dimension of a Weyl algebra module and its multiplicity of a filtered module. Two good filtrations bound each other after fixed shifts: lift finite homogeneous generators in one filtration, bound their degrees in the other, and use compatibility with $F_{j}A$; then reverse the roles. The growth degree and leading coefficient therefore do not depend on the good filtration of a module. The degree is also the Gelfand–Kirillov dimension of a module and the dimension of the characteristic variety of a Weyl algebra module, the support of $\mathrm{gr}M$. Since $M$ is a quotient of a finite sum of copies of $A$, $d(M)\le 2n$.

The essential lower bound is the Bernstein inequality for Weyl algebra modules:Here is a full proof. Multiplication gives a linear map $F_{j}A\to {\mathrm{Hom}}_{\mathbb{C}}(M_j,M_{2j})$. Prove it injective by induction on $j$. At $j=0$ a scalar killing $M_0\ne 0$ must vanish. If $a\in F_{j}A$ kills $M_j$, then for every generator $z$, its commutator $[a,z]\in F_{j-1}A$ kills $M_{j-1}$: both $azm$ and $zam$ are zero for $m\in M_{j-1}$. Induction gives $[a,z]=0$ for all generators. In the ordered basis, $[D_i,a]$ differentiates the $x_i$ exponents and $[x_i,a]$ differentiates the $D_i$ exponents with a minus sign. Vanishing of all these commutators in characteristic zero forces $a$ to be a scalar. It then vanishes because it kills $M_0$. This proves the faithful finite-step action of a Weyl algebra and henceComparison of degrees gives $2n\le 2d(M)$, proving the inequality. Equally, without invoking eventual polynomiality, this estimate directly bounds the Gelfand–Kirillov dimension of a module below by $n$. Right modules satisfy the same inequality through the filtration-preserving isomorphism $A\cong A^{\mathrm{op}}$, $x_i\mapsto x_i$, $D_i\mapsto -D_i$.

A nonzero finitely generated module with $d(M)=n$ is a holonomic Weyl algebra module; the zero module is conventionally included. This minimal-growth class is stable under submodules, quotient modules and extensions. For $0\to N\to M\to Q\to 0$, take the induced and quotient filtrations. Their graded sequence is exact; Noetherianity of $\mathrm{gr}A$ makes the induced filtrations good. Thus the Hilbert functions add andif both nonzero terms have the top dimension, their multiplicities add. For a holonomic Weyl algebra module, every nonzero subquotient has dimension $n$, by the upper bound inherited from $M$ and Bernstein's lower bound. Each nonzero factor in a strict chain therefore consumes positive integral multiplicity. This proves the multiplicity bounds the length of a holonomic Weyl module:In particular a holonomic module is both Noetherian and Artinian and has finite length, although its vector-space dimension is infinite. This distinction separates finite-dimensional representation theory from finite-length Weyl module theory.

The polynomial module $\mathbb{C}[x_1,\dots ,x_n]$, with $x_i$ acting by multiplication and $D_i$ by differentiation, is generated by $1$. Its $M_j$ consists of polynomials of degree at most $j$, with dimension $\left(\genfrac{}{}{0ex}{}{j+n}{n}\right)$, so $d=n$ and $e=1$. It is simple: differentiating a maximal-degree monomial of a nonzero polynomial isolates a nonzero constant, and multiplication by polynomials then generates the whole module. A second basic example is the delta moduleUsing the reverse ordered basis $D^{\beta }{x}^{\alpha }$, its vector space is $\mathbb{C}[D_1,\dots ,D_n]$; $D_i$ acts by multiplication and $x_i$ by negative differentiation. The same argument proves simplicity and holonomicity. These two examples are exchanged by the automorphism $x_i\mapsto D_i$, $D_i\mapsto -x_i$. Free modules, in contrast, have growth dimension $2n$ and are not holonomic. Thus the central organizing invariants are good filtration of a module, growth dimension, characteristic support and multiplicity, with Bernstein's estimate explaining why dimension $n$ is the natural smallest nonzero size.

A right Ore localization at $S$ is a unital homomorphism $\iota :R\to Q$ such that every $\iota (s)$, $s\in S$, is a unit, every element of $Q$ is $\iota (r)\iota (s{)}^{-1}$, andEquivalently, the usual fraction construction has this zero criterion and is universal among homomorphisms that invert $S$. Injectivity is required only when the denominators are regular elements of a ring. If $0\in S$, every homomorphism inverting $S$ has zero target; this is the degenerate zero-ring localization. For a nonzero localization we require $0\notin S$.

The necessary and sufficient conditions are that $S$ be a right denominator set:

For necessity, write the element $\iota (s{)}^{-1}\iota (r)$ as $\iota (b)\iota (t{)}^{-1}$. Multiplying by $\iota (s)$ on the left and $\iota (t)$ on the right gives $\iota (rt-sb)=0$. The zero criterion supplies $u\in S$ with $(rt-sb)u=0$. Hence $r(tu)=s(bu)$, the right Ore condition in $R$, not merely an equality of images in $Q$. Also $sr=0$ makes $\iota (r)=0$ because $\iota (s)$ is invertible, and the zero criterion gives $rt=0$. This proves both necessities.

The sufficiency is the Ore theorem for denominator sets. Concretely, right fractions can be represented by $(r,s)$; a common-denominator equality has $su=tv\in S$ and $ru=r^{\prime }v$ for suitable $u,v\in R$. The two conditions make the induced fraction equivalence transitive and make addition and multiplication well defined; the zero fraction is exactly the kernel displayed above. The requested direction of the theorem was necessity, for which the complete argument has just been given.

For a right Noetherian domain, any two nonzero principal right ideals intersect. To see this without using the desired localization, suppose $bR\cap aR=0$ with $a,b\ne 0$. The sumis direct: reduce a finite relation modulo $aR$ to get its first summand zero, then cancel $a$ in the noncommutative domain and repeat. Every summand is nonzero, so the finite partial sums form a strictly ascending chain of right ideals, contradicting the ascending chain condition. A nonzero intersection $rR\cap sR$ thus provides $rt=sb\ne 0$, with $t\ne 0$. This is the right Ore condition for $S=R\setminus \{0\}$. Reversibility is automatic in a noncommutative domain, and the zero criterion makes the map injective. The localization is a division ring, since a nonzero $r{s}^{-1}$ has inverse $s{r}^{-1}$.

The Goldie theorem states that a semiprime ring has a semisimple Artinian classical right ring of quotients if and only if it has finite right uniform dimension and satisfies the ascending chain condition on right annihilators. A right Noetherian ring satisfies the annihilator condition because right annihilators are right ideals. Its right regular module has finite uniform dimension: an infinite direct sum of nonzero submodules would give a strictly ascending chain of finite partial sums. A prime ring is semiprime, so the theorem applies to a prime right Noetherian ring $R$.

To obtain a single matrix-ring factor, not just a finite product, prove that its quotient $Q$ is prime. A nonzero two-sided ideal $I\subseteq Q$ contains a nonzero fraction $r{s}^{-1}$ and hence the nonzero element $r=(r{s}^{-1})s\in I\cap R$. The same holds for any other nonzero ideal $K$. Since $R$ is prime, $(I\cap R)(K\cap R)\ne 0$, so $IK\ne 0$. Thus $Q$ is prime. The Artin–Wedderburn theorem gives a finite product of matrix rings over division rings; primeness excludes two different nonzero factors with zero product. This proves the prime classical quotient of a prime right Goldie ring:For the requested counterexample to Noetherianity, take $R=k[x_1,x_2,\dots ]$. It is a commutative integral domain and has its field of fractions as its classical right ring of quotients. But $(x_1)⊊(x_1,x_2)⊊\cdots$ is a strictly ascending ideal chain: evaluation at $x_1=\cdots =x_m=0$ shows $x_{m+1}$ is not in the preceding ideal. Therefore existence of a classical quotient does not imply right Noetherianity.

The printed input $x^r{x}^s$ is a genuine typo in the PDF as well as in the TeX: $E$ annihilates every power of $x$, whereas the displayed right-hand side is generally nonzero. The intended input is $x^r{y}^s$, and the calculation below proves that corrected identity.

The given comultiplications make $C_q$ a coalgebra, with counit one on $K,K^{-1},I$ and zero on $E,F$. Write $I_0=p(I)$, $K_0=p(K)$ and $E_0=p(E)$, and similarly for $F$. The measuring coalgebra identities areThe group-like elements act multiplicatively. Although the statement omits an explicit specification of $p(I)$, its identity action follows from the other data and the quantum plane relation. Applying $E_0$ to $yx=qxy$ gives $q{x}^2=q{I}_0(x)x$, so cancellation in the noncommutative domain gives $I_0(x)=x$. Applying $F_0$ to the same relation gives $q{y}^2=qy{I}_0(y)$, so $I_0(y)=y$. Thus $I_0$ is the identity on the entire quantum plane.

Now $E_0(x^r)=0$ by induction. Suppose $E_0(y^{s-1})=[s-1]x{y}^{s-2}$. The measuring rule and $y^{s-1}x=q^{s-1}x{y}^{s-1}$ giveThe induction starts with $E_0(y)=x$ and $[1]=1$. A final product rule givesFor $s=0$ the answer is zero. By contrast the literal printed input has $\boxed{p(E)(x^r{x}^s)=0}$; it cannot satisfy the printed right-hand side for $s=1$.

A right Noetherian ring satisfies the ascending chain condition on right ideals; equivalently, every right ideal is a finitely generated module.

Here is a noncommutative Hilbert basis theorem proof adapted to the stated hypothesis. Set $F_{-1}=0$ andThe equality follows inductively from $A+xA=A+Ax$, by moving one coefficient past one $x$ at a time. These spaces form an exhaustive filtered algebra structure on $B$, with $F_n{F}_m\subseteq F_{n+m}$. This does not assert uniqueness of the displayed expressions or the existence of a coefficient-moving automorphism.

For a right ideal $I\subseteq B$, defineEach $L_n$ is a right ideal of $A$. In fact, if $a\in L_n$ and $c\in A$, write $c{x}^n=x^{n}b+u$ with $b\in A$, $u\in F_{n-1}$; then $ac{x}^n=(a{x}^n)b+au\in I+F_{n-1}$. Also $L_n\subseteq L_{n+1}$ by right multiplication by $x$. Since $A$ is a right Noetherian ring, this ascending chain stabilizes at some $L_N$.

Choose finite generators $a_{nj}$ for each $L_n$, $0\le n\le N$, and choose $f_{nj}\in I$ with $f_{nj}-a_{nj}{x}^n\in F_{n-1}$. These finitely many elements generate $I$ as a right ideal. To see this, induct on $m$ for $f\in I\cap F_m$. Write $f=a{x}^m+u$ with $u\in F_{m-1}$; then $a\in L_m$. Put $d=\min (m,N)$ and express $a={\sum }_j{a}_{dj}{c}_j$. Write $c_j{x}^d=x^d{b}_j+u_j$ with $u_j\in F_{d-1}$. The differencelies in $I\cap F_{m-1}$, so the induction applies. At $m=0$ the remainder is zero. Hence $B$ is right Noetherian.

For the quantum torus, take $q\in k^{\times }$ and the convention $YX=qXY$. Begin with the polynomial ring $k[X]$, which is Noetherian by the Hilbert basis theorem. Adjoining $X^{-1}$ preserves the hypothesis because it commutes with $k[X]$, and gives $k[X^{\pm 1}]$. Adjoin $Y$ next. The relation $Yf(X)=f(qX)Y$ and its inverse coefficient-moving relation give $A+YA=A+AY$ for $A=k[X^{\pm 1}]$. Finally adjoin $Y^{-1}$ to $k[X^{\pm 1}][Y;\sigma ]$, where $\sigma (X)=qX$. On a monomial, $Y^{-1}{X}^i{Y}^j=q^{-i}{X}^i{Y}^{j-1}$; when $j=0$ this is in $A{Y}^{-1}$, and when $j>0$ it is in $A$. The reverse inclusion follows by the same relation. The preceding argument applies at each step, proving the quantum torus is right Noetherian. Nonzero $q$ is required for this notation.

For a noncommutative ring, a prime ideal of a noncommutative ring means a proper two-sided ideal $P$ such that $UV\subseteq P$ for two-sided ideals $U,V$ implies $U\subseteq P$ or $V\subseteq P$. Equivalently, $aAb\subseteq P$ implies $a\in P$ or $b\in P$. This definition does not require $A/P$ to be a noncommutative domain.

Retain the right Noetherian ring hypothesis for the last assertion. More generally, the ascending chain condition on two-sided ideals suffices. We claim that every proper two-sided ideal $I$ contains a product of finitely many prime ideals of a noncommutative ring, each containing $I$. If not, choose a maximal counterexample $I$. It cannot be a prime ideal of a noncommutative ring. Thus there are two-sided ideals $U,V$ strictly containing $I$ with $UV\subseteq I$: add $I$ to the two witnesses for failure of the defining condition for a prime ideal of a noncommutative ring. By maximality, both $U$ and $V$ contain products of finitely many prime ideals of a noncommutative ring containing them. Concatenating these products gives a product inside $UV\subseteq I$, a contradiction.

Apply the claim to $I=0$ in a nonzero $A$, obtaining $P_1\cdots P_r=0$. Every prime ideal of a noncommutative ring $Q$ contains one of the $P_i$, by repeated application of the definition of a prime ideal of a noncommutative ring. For the prime radical of a noncommutative ring $N$, it follows thatIndeed, $N\subseteq P_i$ gives $N^r\subseteq P_1\cdots P_r=0$, and ${\bigcap }_i{P}_i\subseteq Q$ for every $Q$ gives equality of the intersections. If $A=0$, the empty intersection is the whole zero ring and the conclusion is immediate.

The final assertion is false for arbitrary algebras without the preceding chain condition. For example, in the commutative ring $k[z_1,z_2,\dots ]/(z_i^2:i\ge 1)$ the nilradical is $(z_1,z_2,\dots )$, its only prime ideal, but the product of any number of distinct $z_i$ is nonzero. Thus this nilradical is not a nilpotent ideal.

Use $q\in k^{\times }$ and $YX=qXY$ for the quantum plane. Its monomials $X^i{Y}^j$, $i,j\ge 0$, form a basis, with multiplicationOne way to verify the basis assertion without assuming it is to define this multiplication on the vector space with the displayed formal basis. This defines an associative algebra: for a third monomial $X^w{Y}^z$, the two products of three monomials have the same exponent $ju+jw+vw$ of $q$, and its generators satisfy the required relation. Conversely, the relation puts every word into this form, establishing the presentation. Order exponent pairs by the lexicographic order. The largest monomials of two nonzero finite sums give the uniquely largest monomial of their product, with coefficient $cd{q}^{ju}\ne 0$. Therefore the quantum plane is a domain. If one allows $q=0$, the assertion fails because $YX=0$ with both factors nonzero.

A uniform module is a nonzero module in which any two nonzero submodules have nonzero intersection. Suppose the right regular module of a right Noetherian domain $A$ were not a uniform module. Choose nonzero $a,b$ from two right ideals with zero intersection. Then $aA\cap bA=0$. The right idealsform a direct sum. For if ${\sum }_{i=0}^m{b}^{i}a{c}_i=0$, then $a{c}_0\in aA\cap bA$ is zero, so $c_0=0$ by the noncommutative domain property. Cancel the nonzero factor $b$ on the left and repeat to obtain every $c_i=0$. Each summand is nonzero, so their finite partial sums form a strictly ascending chain of right ideals. This contradicts the ascending chain condition of a right Noetherian ring. Hence $A$ is a uniform right module.

It follows that $aA\cap sA\ne 0$ whenever $a,s\ne 0$: there are nonzero $u,v$ with $au=sv$. This is the right Ore condition for the multiplicative set $S=A\setminus \{0\}$; zero numerators cause no difficulty. The Ore localization theorem therefore constructs the ring of right fractionsThe map is injective because an element mapping to zero is annihilated on the right by some nonzero denominator, impossible in a noncommutative domain. To make the denominator convention concrete, if $su=tv\ne 0$ thenFor multiplication, choose $bu=sc$ with $u\ne 0$; thenCommon right multiples make these operations independent of the chosen representatives. Every nonzero $a{s}^{-1}$ has inverse $s{a}^{-1}$, so $Q$ is a division ring. The original field $k$ is central in $A$ and therefore in the inverses as well, making $Q$ a division algebra over $k$. No commutative fraction field construction is being assumed.

We first prove that any two nonzero principal left ideals $Ra$ and $Rb$ intersect nontrivially. Suppose instead that $Ra\cap Rb=0$. The nonzero left idealsthen form a direct sum. Indeed, take a finite relationIt impliesAs $R$ is a noncommutative domain and $a\ne 0$, this gives $u_0=0$. Right cancellation of the nonzero element $b$ reduces the remaining relation to one of the same form with one fewer term. Repetition gives $u_1=\cdots =u_m=0$, proving the asserted direct sum.

Consequently its finite partial sums give a strictly ascending chain of left ideals, contradicting the ascending chain condition in a left Noetherian ring. Thus $Ra\cap Rb\ne 0$ whenever $a,b\ne 0$. This is the left Noetherian domain Ore lemma.

Now take $s\in S=R\setminus \{0\}$ and $r\in R$. If $r=0$, choose $s^{\prime }=1$ and $r^{\prime }=0$. Otherwise chooseSince $z\ne 0$, the coefficient $s^{\prime }$ is nonzero and hence belongs to $S$. This proves the left Ore set condition in all cases.

A multiplicative subset $S$ is a left Ore set if for every $s\in S$ and $r\in R$ there are $s^{\prime }\in S$ and $r^{\prime }\in R$ withEquivalently, the subsets $Sr$ and $Rs$ intersect for each such pair. This is the common-left-multiple condition needed for Ore localization with denominators on the left. In a noncommutative domain, no extra condition concerning annihilation by denominators is needed, since all members of $S$ are regular elements of a ring.

Take $D=\hat{R}$. We first check that this noncommutative formal power series ring is a noncommutative domain. For nonzero $F,G\in D$, let $p,q$ be the smallest lengths of words with nonzero coefficients in $F,G$, respectively. Their degree-$p$ and degree-$q$ parts $F_p,G_q$ are nonzero homogeneous polynomials in the free associative algebra.

Choose words $u,v$ with nonzero coefficients in $F_p,G_q$. In $F_p{G}_q$, the coefficient of $uv$ is the product of those two coefficients: a word of length $p+q$ has a unique splitting into a prefix of length $p$ and a suffix of length $q$. This product is nonzero in $\mathbb{Q}$. The degree-$p+q$ part of $FG$ is exactly $F_p{G}_q$, since all lower parts of $F$ and $G$ vanish. Thus $FG\ne 0$, proving that $D$ is a noncommutative domain.

By the defining property of the free associative algebra, there is a ring homomorphismThe same substitution defines a ring automorphism of $R$, with inverse $x_1\mapsto x_1-1$, $x_2\mapsto x_2-2$. Composing this ring automorphism with the natural inclusion $R\hookrightarrow D$ proves that $f$ is injective.

Finally,Their constant terms are $3,-1,1,2$, respectively, all nonzero. By the unit criterion for noncommutative formal power series proved in c, all four elements are units. Therefore $D$ and $f$ have every required property. The embedding changes the images of the generators, so the failure of the original monomial left Ore set in b presents no obstruction.

For a field $k$ and $q\in k^{\times }$, the quantum plane is $k_q[X,Y]=k⟨X,Y⟩/(YX-qXY)$. Its ordered monomials $X^i{Y}^j$, $i,j\ge 0$, are a basis, and their multiplication is $X^i{Y}^j{X}^u{Y}^v=q^{ju}{X}^{i+u}{Y}^{j+v}$. Leading monomials show it is a noncommutative domain. Some sources interchange $q$ with $q^{-1}$ in the defining relation.

A noncommutative domain whose right ideals satisfy the ascending chain condition is a right Noetherian domain. Its right regular module is a uniform module, so any two nonzero principal right ideals intersect. Thus its nonzero elements satisfy the right Ore condition and it embeds in a division ring by Ore localization.

If two nonzero principal right ideals in a right Noetherian domain had zero intersection, the sums $bR\oplus abR\oplus \cdots \oplus a^{m}bR$ would be strictly increasing. Directness follows by splitting the lowest term into $bR$ and the other terms into $aR$, then cancelling $a$ and repeating. This contradicts the ascending chain condition. A nonzero common element $au=bv$ gives the right Ore condition. The left version follows from the opposite ring. Consequently a noncommutative domain Noetherian on both sides has a single division ring of fractions with both left and right fraction presentations.

A multiplicative subset $S\subseteq A$ with $1\in S$ and $0\notin S$ of a ring $A$ satisfies the right Ore condition if for every $a\in A$ and $s\in S$ there are $u\in S$ and $b\in A$ such that $au=sb$. For a noncommutative domain, taking $S=A\setminus \{0\}$ gives a ring of right fractions $a{s}^{-1}$; every nonzero fraction is invertible. The usual additional denominator reversibility condition is automatic when the elements of $S$ are nonzero in a noncommutative domain.

A multiplicative subset $S$ of a ring is a right Ore set if $1\in S$, $0\notin S$ and it satisfies the right Ore condition. In a noncommutative domain, this condition lets nonzero denominators be used in Ore localization.

Let $A$ have no zero divisors and $\sigma$ be an automorphism. For nonzero Laurent polynomials $f=\sum a_i{x}^i$ and $g=\sum b_j{x}^j$ with greatest exponents $m,n$, the coefficient of $x^{m+n}$ in $fg$ is $a_m{\sigma }^m(b_n)$. No other exponent pair contributes to that highest degree. Both factors are nonzero, so their product is nonzero, proving the noncommutative domain property in every characteristic.