Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2003 iii Paper 1 4 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Use the finite-dimensional complex-module setting of the course. We prove the Weyl complete reducibility theorem by Haar averaging produces invariant complements, defining its constructions rather than invoking complete reducibility itself.
Choose a compact real form : it is a real Lie subalgebra with , and its simply connected Lie group is compact. Existence of this form and compact group is a standard fact for complex semisimple Lie algebras. Restrict the representation to ; integration of a Lie-algebra representation gives a group representation . Since is connected and generated by exponentials, the -invariant subspace is also -invariant.
Choose any positive-definite Hermitian inner product on . With the Haar measure of normalized to mass one, defineThis is a Hermitian inner product, and it is positive-definite: for every is nonzero, so the continuous positive integrand has positive integral. Right invariance of Haar measure gives for .
Let for this averaged inner product. Finite-dimensional inner-product linear algebra gives . If and , thenbecause . Thus is -invariant. Differentiating makes it -invariant, and since it is a complex vector subspace, also preserves it. ThereforeThe zero or whole-space submodule cases are included. This proves the required complement theorem without circularly assuming it.
The finite-dimensional hypothesis is essential to the statement. The nonsplit zero-weight Verma extension for sl2 is a counterexample for unrestricted modules: has basis with , and . Its submodule spanned by for has trivial one-dimensional quotient. A complement would be trivial and contained in the zero-weight line , yet . Hence no such complement exists in that infinite-dimensional case. The paper's finite-dimensional representation setting supplies the necessary hypothesis.