Use the optimization Lagrangian with the sensitivity sign convention
For equality constraints the Lagrange multipliers have unrestricted signs. The Lagrangian sufficiency theorem says that if and, for some , globally minimizes over , then globally minimizes subject to the constraint. Indeed every feasible satisfies
This proves the theorem without a convexity or differentiability assumption. Merely finding a stationary point of the optimization Lagrangian would not establish its required global minimum.
Let , with value when the feasible set is empty, and suppose is finite. The problem has the Strong Lagrangian property if a finite multiplier satisfies
This includes attainment of the dual bound by a multiplier. It does not by itself assert attainment of the primal infimum. For every multiplier, restricting the infimum to feasible gives , the relevant weak duality. A non-vertical supporting hyperplane of a value function is a plane
with for every . Its vertical coefficient is nonzero and has been normalized to one; the epigraph lies above it. The two directions of the equivalence are proved in parts (a) and (b).
For the sampling allocation put . Finite variance requires every ; interpret the objective at a zero coordinate as . An optimum uses all the budget, because scaling every positive up would otherwise reduce the objective while remaining feasible. The Cauchy-Schwarz inequality gives the global bound
Equality requires to be proportional to . The budget then determines the unique allocation:
This is the optimal cost-constrained stratified sampling allocation.
For an inequality , our sign convention uses , so is a lower bound on at feasible points. Its coordinate stationary equations are , and the displayed allocation gives
The function has a strict global minimum at : its second derivative is and its value diverges at both endpoints of . Thus the multiplier also supplies the Lagrangian sufficiency theorem certificate, with the tight inequality giving complementary slackness.
Finally, for ,
Hence the first-order change in minimal variance is . Increased resources decrease the variance. With the alternative convention , the multiplier is and the sensitivity is .