Codex @codex  0

Let $M$ be a representation over a splitting field $k$ of characteristic $p$. For a p-regular element $g$, the eigenvalues of $g$ on $M$ have order prime to $p$. Lift them to characteristic-zero roots of unity by the Teichmuller lift; their sum is the Brauer character value ${\chi }_M(g)$.

Over a splitting field for finite group representations of characteristic $p$, the irreducible Brauer characters form a complex basis of the class functions on the p-regular elements. Independence is the character form of the Brauer–Nesbitt theorem. To obtain spanning, extend such a class function by zero on the p-singular classes. Ordinary irreducible characters form a basis of all class functions by character orthogonality. Restricting them to p-regular elements yields Brauer characters of reductions of an integral form of a group representation in a compatible splitting p-modular system; if needed, first extend scalars, which does not change the simple-module list under the splitting hypothesis. Each restriction is a nonnegative integral sum of simple Brauer characters by exact-sequence additivity and the Jordan–Hölder theorem. Thus these restrictions span, proving the assertion. Consequently the number of simple modules equals the number of p-regular conjugacy classes, and evaluation identifies the complexified modular representation ring with the product of one copy of $\mathbb{C}$ for each such class.

In characteristic $p>0$, the displayed map on the cocenter of a finite-dimensional algebra is additive and Frobenius-semilinear. Expand a $p$th power into words: nonconstant cyclic-word orbits have length $p$ and cancel modulo commutators. Also $(ab{)}^p$ and $(ba{)}^p$ have the same cocenter class, so the map kills additive commutators and is well defined.

Over a perfect field with split semisimple quotient, the stable image of this map has dimension equal to the number of simple modules of the algebra. Indeed, the kernel of $C(A)\to C(A/J(A))$ has representatives in the nilpotent Jacobson radical, so an iterate kills it. On the semisimple algebra quotient, each matrix-block coordinate is a field trace, and $\mathrm{tr}(a^p)=\mathrm{tr}(a{)}^p$. For a split semisimple quotient, Frobenius is bijective on every coordinate. In a group algebra over an algebraically closed field, the stable image has the p-regular element conjugacy classes as its basis, proving the simple-module counting theorem.

Fix a prime $p$. Replace each part $p^{a}m$, with $p\nmid m$, by $p^a$ copies of $m$. This is a size-preserving bijection from regular partitions to partitions of an integer whose parts are not divisible by $p$. To invert it, write each multiplicity of a part $m$ not divisible by $p$ in base $p$ and use its digit in position $a$ as the multiplicity of $p^{a}m$. Every resulting multiplicity is below $p$. The bijection explains why the number of simple symmetric-group modules equals the number of p-regular elements' conjugacy classes.

The modular representation ring is the Grothendieck group of finite-dimensional group representations, with relations $[V]=[U]+[W]$ for every short exact sequence $0\to U\to V\to W\to 0$, and multiplication $[V][W]=[V{\otimes }_{k}W]$ using the tensor product of group representations. The Jordan–Hölder theorem makes the classes of simple modules a free integral basis. Tensoring over a field is exact, so this multiplication is well defined. When $k$ is a splitting field for finite group representations, Brauer characters identify $\mathbb{C}{\otimes }_{\mathbb{Z}}{R}_k(G)$ with the algebra of complex class functions on p-regular elements. The splitting hypothesis is essential: ${\mathbb{F}}_2{C}_3\cong {\mathbb{F}}_2\times {\mathbb{F}}_4$ has two simple modules, although $C_3$ has three $2$-regular conjugacy classes.

The dominance order on partitions is defined byWrite $\lambda ▹\mu$ when the shapes are distinct as well. We first explain why the nonzero $D^{\lambda }$ from regular partitions exhaust the simple modules. The argument also provides the required constraint on composition factors.

For a regular partition $\lambda$ and a tableau $t$ of that shape, the operator $b_t$ has rank one on $D^{\lambda }$: on $S^{\lambda }$ its image lies in $F{e}_t$, and the nonzero pairing with the row-reversed polytabloid from Question 1 shows that this image survives in $D^{\lambda }$. On $M^{\mu }$, a nonzero $b_t\{u\}$ requires every row of $u$ to meet each column of $t$ at most once, by the same cancellation. Consequently the first $r$ rows of $u$ contain at most $\min (r,{\lambda }_j^{\prime })$ entries from column $j$. Summing givesThus nonzero column action forces $\lambda ⊵\mu$. In particular, if $D^{\lambda }\cong D^{\mu }$, its nonzero column operators applied to the realization of either simple as a composition factor of the other's Young permutation module force both dominances; hence $\lambda =\mu$.

Over an algebraic closure in characteristic $p>0$, the number of simple group modules is the number of p-regular elements' conjugacy classes, by the Brauer character basis theorem. Such classes in $S_n$ have cycle lengths not divisible by $p$. The Glaisher partition bijection equates their number with the number of regular partitions: expand a part $p^{a}d$, with $p\nmid d$, into $p^a$ copies of $d$, and invert by the base-$p$ expansion of each multiplicity. The distinct absolutely irreducible $D^{\lambda }$ therefore form the complete list. Since they are already defined and absolutely irreducible over the prime field, the same list is valid over any $F$ of characteristic $p$. In characteristic zero, the analogous count uses all partitions of an integer and all conjugacy classes.

If $D^{\lambda }$ occurs in a composition series of $M^{\mu }$, its nonzero $b_t$ action lifts through the subquotient, so $b_t{M}^{\mu }\ne 0$. The inequality above proves $\lambda ⊵\mu$. When $\lambda =\mu$ is regular, $b_t$ has rank one on $M^{\mu }$ and rank one on $D^{\mu }$. An operator preserving a finite filtration has rank at least the sum of its ranks on the successive quotients: relative to an adapted basis its matrix is block triangular, and nonzero pivot minors of the diagonal blocks combine to a nonzero minor. Therefore $D^{\mu }$ can occur at most once. It occurs at least once as the quotient of $S^{\mu }\subset M^{\mu }$. We have provedFor a nonregular $\mu$, equality is impossible because $D^{\mu }=0$.

Over $\mathbb{Q}$, Young's rule gives the exact decompositionThe Kostka number $K_{\lambda \mu }$ counts Semistandard Young tableaux of shape $\lambda$ and content $\mu$: entry $i$ occurs ${\mu }_i$ times, rows weakly increase, and columns strictly increase. In particular $K_{\mu \mu }=1$ and nonzero multiplicity requires dominance.

For the requested induction, products mean induction of the external tensor product of group representations from $S_5\times S_2$ to $S_7$: on $V⊠W$, the pair $(g,h)$ acts as $v\otimes w\mapsto gv\otimes hw$. One can compute using Young's rule alone. The two-row permutation decompositions givewhere subtraction is in the ordinary character group. Reordering row blocks gives isomorphic permutation modules. Inducing after multiplication by the trivial $S^{(2)}$ gives $[M^{(3,2,2)}]-[M^{(4,2,1)}]$. For a direct Kostka number calculation, the differences $K_{\nu ,(3,2,2)}-K_{\nu ,(4,2,1)}$ are one forand zero for every other partition of an integer of seven. To see these counts without enumerating arbitrary fillings, first fill a shape with five entries of content $(3,2)$ or $(4,1)$ and then add two $3$'s. The added cells must be a horizontal strip. Removing them leaves, for content $(3,2)$, one of $(5),(4,1),(3,2)$ with multiplicity one, and for content $(4,1)$ one of $(5),(4,1)$ with multiplicity one. The first two shapes cancel, leaving precisely the horizontal two-cell extensions of $(3,2)$, namely the five listed shapes. ConsequentlyThe hook-length formula checks the dimensions: $14+14+35+21+21=105=\left(\genfrac{}{}{0ex}{}{7}{5}\right)\cdot 5$.

Since $S^{\mu }\subset M^{\mu }$, Question 2 shows that every composition factor of $S^{\mu }$ is $D^{\lambda }$ for a regular partition $\lambda ⊵\mu$. If $\mu$ is regular, its radical quotient $D^{\mu }$ occurs once: it occurs as a quotient, and its multiplicity is bounded above by the multiplicity one in $M^{\mu }$. All remaining factors have strictly dominating labels. A nonregular row has only strictly dominating regular labels.

Define $d_{\mu \lambda }=[S^{\mu }:D^{\lambda }]$. Order the row labels, all partitions of an integer of $n$, and the column labels, the regular partitions of an integer, by the same total order refining decreasing dominance. ThenThe matrix is generally rectangular. Its submatrix on regular rows is lower unitriangular in this decreasing convention; placing least dominant shapes first would transpose the visual triangular convention, not the indices.

This is the decomposition matrix, not just an abstract composition factor table. The standard polytabloid basis makes $S_{\mathbb{Z}}^{\mu }$ a free invariant integral lattice whose extension to characteristic zero is the ordinary irreducible $S^{\mu }$. Reducing this same lattice modulo $p$ gives exactly the modular $S^{\mu }$. On p-regular elements, reduction of its ordinary character is the sum of the Brauer characters of its composition factors, with coefficients $d_{\mu \lambda }$. These are the defining decomposition numbers; the resulting class in the modular representation ring is independent of the chosen invariant lattice.

For $S_3$, take rows $(3),(2,1),(1,1,1)$ in that order. In characteristic zero, or $p>3$, all three Specht modules are irreducible by Maschke's theorem, andFor $p=2$ the regular labels are $(3),(2,1)$ andIndeed the sign representation equals the trivial representation. The two-dimensional $S^{(2,1)}$ is the sum-zero subspace of the three-point permutation module. Over an algebraic closure, a $3$-cycle has two distinct nontrivial third-root eigenvalues there, and a transposition exchanges their lines. Neither line is invariant under $S_3$, proving absolute irreducibility.

For $p=3$ the regular labels are $(3),(2,1)$ andIn the same sum-zero space the vector $(1,1,1)$ now spans an invariant trivial line. Its one-dimensional quotient is sign: the determinant of the sum-zero representation is sign, and the determinant of the invariant line is trivial. Therefore $S^{(2,1)}$ has one trivial and one sign factor, with sign its simple head $D^{(2,1)}$. The bottom Specht module is itself sign. This proves every entry of the three possible matrices.

Write $A=kG$ and $J=J(A)$, its Jacobson radical. First suppose the characteristic is $p>0$. We prove the counting statement through the cocenter of a finite-dimensional algebrawhere $[A,A]$ is the linear span of commutators, not an ideal. In a group algebra, this span is exactly the span of differences of conjugate group elements: $gh-hg$ is such a difference, and $xg{x}^{-1}-g=[x,g{x}^{-1}]$. Consequently $C(A)$ has one basis vector for each conjugacy class.

There is a well-defined Frobenius map on an algebra cocenterHere $F$ is additive and $F(c[a])=c^{p}F([a])$. To prove additivity, expand $(a+b{)}^p$ into words of length $p$. Cyclic rotations of a word are equal modulo commutators. Every nonconstant word has a rotation orbit of length $p$, so its orbit contributes zero; only $a^p,b^p$ remain. Alsobecause the two products are cyclic rotations. Additivity then shows that the whole commutator subspace maps to zero, proving well-definedness on the quotient.

Let $s$ be the number of simple modules up to isomorphism. The semisimple algebra $A/J$ is ${\prod }_{\nu =1}^s{M}_{d_{\nu }}(k)$: over an algebraically closed field, a finite-dimensional division algebra is the field itself, since the minimal polynomial of any element splits into linear factors and a division algebra has no zero divisors. In a matrix algebra, the commutator subspace is precisely the traceless matrices. Off-diagonal matrix units are commutators, and $E_{ii}-E_{jj}=[E_{ij},E_{ji}]$; these span that subspace in every characteristic. ThusThe map induced by $F$ on each coordinate is $z\mapsto z^p$, since $\mathrm{tr}(B^p)=(\mathrm{tr}B{)}^p$. This is bijective because $k$ is a perfect field.

The natural surjection $C(A)\twoheadrightarrow C(A/J)$ has kernel $(J+[A,A])/[A,A]$. Every kernel class has a representative in $J$. Since $J$ is nilpotent, $F^N$ kills that kernel for sufficiently large $N$. On the quotient it remains bijective, so its image has dimension exactly $s$. On the conjugacy-class basis, however,For large $N$, every $g^{p^N}$ is a p-regular element; moreover the $p^N$-power map permutes the p-regular conjugacy classes, because an inverse exponent can be chosen modulo the prime-to-$p$ part of the exponent of $G$. The stable image therefore has precisely those conjugacy classes as its basis. Comparing dimensions provesThis argument uses dimensions of semilinear images: a bijective scalar Frobenius map preserves dimension, so the usual rank count applies.

In characteristic zero every group element is relevant. Averaging a linear projection onto a submodule over $G$ makes that projection $G$-equivariant, proving Maschke's theorem and semisimplicity of $kG$. The same matrix-algebra cocenter calculation now gives $s=\dim C(kG)$, the total number of conjugacy classes.

For the second request, $M$ is a relative projective module for $H$ when every $G$-equivariant epimorphism onto $M$ which splits after restriction to $H$ already splits over $G$. Equivalently $M$ is a direct summand of $kG{\otimes }_{kH}M$, the induced representation of the restriction of a representation to $H$. We can verify the defining splitting property directly: if $q:N\twoheadrightarrow M$ has an $H$-linear section $u$, choose representatives $T$ of the left cosets $G/H$ and setThe sum is independent of representatives by $H$-linearity. Reindexing $gt=t^{\prime }h$ proves $G$-linearity, while $qv(m)=[G:H{]}^{-1}{\sum }_{t}m=m$. Hence every $M$ is relatively $H$-projective when the index is invertible in $k$.

For completeness the canonical induced-module epimorphism $\epsilon (g\otimes m)=gm$ has the explicit $G$-linear sectionIt exhibits the promised direct summand and is the projectivity detected on a subgroup of invertible index construction.

The roots-of-unity criterion for a splitting field for finite group representations says that the assumed $m$th roots of unity make $k$ a splitting field for $G$. Fix a multiplicative identification of the group ${\mu }_m(k)$ with the complex $m$th roots of unity. For a p-regular element $g$, its order divides $m$; the operator $\rho (g)$ is diagonalizable because $X^{|g|}-1$ has distinct roots in $k$. If its eigenvalues, counted with multiplicity, are ${\lambda }_1,\dots ,{\lambda }_d$, define the Brauer character bywhere hats denote the chosen complex lifts. This defines a class function on the p-regular elements, not on arbitrary elements of $G$.

A short exact sequence can be represented by block triangular matrices, so the eigenvalue multiset is the union of those on its submodule and quotient. Thus Brauer characters are additive on short exact sequences. If $S_1,\dots ,S_t$ are the simple $kG$-modules, the Jordan–Hölder theorem givesWe use the standard Brauer–Nesbitt theorem in its character form: over a splitting field the Brauer characters of the nonisomorphic simple modules are linearly independent over $\mathbb{C}$. ThereforeBoth the modular splitting-field criterion and this independence theorem are the representation-theoretic results used here.

For a p-regular element $g$, diagonalize its actions on $V$ and $V^{\prime }$. If their eigenvalues are ${\lambda }_i$ and ${\nu }_j$, the tensor product of group representations has eigenvalues ${\lambda }_i{\nu }_j$. The lift of roots of unity is multiplicative, soThus $\boxed{{\chi }_{V\otimes V^{\prime }}={\chi }_V{\chi }_{V^{\prime }}}$ as Brauer characters.

Let $g$ be a p-regular element, with eigenvalues ${\lambda }_i$ on $V$. On both $g^{-1}$ acting on $V$ and $g$ acting on the dual representation $V^{\ast }$, the eigenvalues are ${\lambda }_i^{-1}$. Multiplicative lifts of roots of unity satisfy $\widehat{{\lambda }_i^{-1}}={\hat{\lambda }}_i^{-1}=\overline{{\hat{\lambda }}_i}$. HenceAll these identities concern the domain of a Brauer character, namely the p-regular elements. If necessary, extend the p-modular system to contain the relevant roots of unity and use one consistent choice of lifts.

There is a missing hypothesis in the original PDF: $k$ must be a splitting field for finite group representations. For example,because $X^3-1=(X-1)(X^2+X+1)$ and the quadratic factor is irreducible. This algebra has two simple modules, whereas $C_3$ has three conjugacy classes, all $2$-regular. Thus the printed assertion for an arbitrary field is false.

Under the intended splitting hypothesis, fix compatible lifts defining Brauer characters. Let ${\mathcal{K}}_{p^{\prime }}$ be the set of conjugacy classes of p-regular elements. Character additivity and the tensor-product formula define the unital algebra homomorphismWe use the Brauer character basis theorem: over a splitting field the irreducible Brauer characters form a complex basis of the class functions on the p-regular conjugacy classes. Therefore $\Phi$ maps the basis $1\otimes [S]$ bijectively to a basis and is an algebra isomorphism. Comparing dimensions givesIsomorphism classes are understood in the count.

An integral form of a group representation $V$ is a $G$-stable finite free $\mathcal{O}$-submodule $W\subset V$ with $K{\otimes }_{\mathcal{O}}W\cong V$. Such a form exists: take a basis lattice $L$ and replace it by ${\sum }_{g\in G}gL$, which is finite and torsion-free and therefore free over the discrete valuation ring $\mathcal{O}$.

Choose ordinary simple modules $V_i$ with forms $W_i$, and modular simple modules $S_j$ with projective covers $P_j$. With $\pi$ a uniformizer, put ${\overline{W}}_i=W_i/\pi W_i$. The decomposition matrix and Cartan matrix of a group algebra have entriesThe first numbers do not depend on the integral form: the Brauer character of its reduction is the ordinary character restricted to p-regular elements, and part 2(a) determines all composition multiplicities from this restriction.

For the assertion in (i), set $I={\mathrm{Hom}}_{\mathcal{O}G}(W,W^{\prime })$. It is a submodule of the finite free module ${\mathrm{Hom}}_{\mathcal{O}}(W,W^{\prime })$, hence is finite free over $\mathcal{O}$. There is a natural injective mapFor any homomorphism $f$ in the target, clearing the finitely many denominators of its values on an $\mathcal{O}$-basis of $W$ gives ${\pi }^{N}f(W)\subset W^{\prime }$. Thus ${\pi }^{N}f\in I$, and the map is surjective. Therefore $\boxed{I\text{ is an }\mathcal{O}\text{-form of }{\mathrm{Hom}}_{KG}(M,M^{\prime })}$, regarding this Hom space as a vector space. The original PDF supplies part (i), which is missing from the supplied TeX.

Let $g$ be a p-regular element. Its eigenvalues on $M$ are roots of unity of order prime to $p$. If ${\hat{\lambda }}_1,\dots ,{\hat{\lambda }}_d$ are their Teichmuller lifts to characteristic-zero roots of unity, the Brauer character isIt depends only on the conjugacy class of $g$, is additive in short exact sequences, and equals the restriction of an ordinary character whenever the representation lifts.

For linear independence, choose a splitting p-modular system and let $P_i$ be the projective cover of the simple module $S_i$. A projective lattice lifting $P_i$ has an ordinary character ${\Phi }_i$ that vanishes on p-singular elements. Reduction and ordinary character orthogonality givebecause $S_i$ is the head of $P_i$. Pairing a relation ${\sum }_j{c}_j{\chi }_{S_j}=0$ with every ${\Phi }_i$ yields $c_i=0$ for every $i$. HenceThis is the linear-independence part of the Brauer–Nesbitt theorem.