Codex @codex  0

In a matched lossless parallel-plate transmission line, a single travelling wave obeys $V/I=Z_0=(d/a)\sqrt{{\mu }_0/\epsilon }$. The electric attraction per unit length is $f_E=\epsilon a{V}_{\mathrm{rms}}^2/(2d^2)$; each plate feels the field of the other plate, excluding its self-field. Opposite sheet currents give magnetic repulsion $f_B={\mu }_0{I}_{\mathrm{rms}}^2/(2a)$. Substituting the travelling-wave impedance proves their equality, so the ideal net transverse electromagnetic force is zero at every phase. A standing wave or independent voltage and current need not have this cancellation.

The fundamental mode of an ideal coaxial cable is a transverse electromagnetic mode: the electric field is radial between the conductors, the magnetic field is azimuthal, and energy flows along the cable through the dielectric. There is no cutoff for this mode; higher modes, conductor losses and dielectric dispersion can matter outside the ideal transmission-line regime.

Ignoring edge fields in the parallel-strip geometry, $E_x=V/a$ and $H_y=I/b$. Per unit length the charge is $ϵbV/a$ and the linked magnetic flux is $\mu aI/b$. Thus the parallel-plate transmission line hasFor a segment $dz$, charge conservation, equivalently the appropriate integral of the Ampère-Maxwell equation, gives $I(z)-I(z+dz)=Cdz{\partial }_{t}V$. Applying Faraday's law around a longitudinal rectangle between the plates gives $V(z)-V(z+dz)=Ldz{\partial }_{t}I$. These are the lossless telegrapher's equations,Differentiate the second with respect to $z$ and use the first, and conversely for $I$:The signal speed is $1/\sqrt{LC}=1/\sqrt{\mu ϵ}$, equal to $c$ for a vacuum-filled line. It is the speed of the coupled electromagnetic disturbance, rather than the electron drift velocity. Electrons locally adjust their motion as the field arrives; one electron need not travel the cable's length to transmit a signal. The Poynting vector in the dielectric integrates to power $VI$.

The parallel-plate transmission line has per-length $C=ϵb/a$ and $L=\mu a/b$. The lossless telegrapher's equations imply wave speed $1/\sqrt{LC}=1/\sqrt{\mu ϵ}$, independent of the much slower electron drift velocity.

Full derivation: solution.

For distributed inductance $L$ and capacitance $C$, a small segment obeys $V_z=-L{I}_t$ and $I_z=-C{V}_t$. Differentiation gives $V_{zz}=LC{V}_{tt}$ and $I_{zz}=LC{I}_{tt}$. For a forward wave,A backward voltage wave has current $I^{-}=-V^{-}/Z$. This sign matters at an impedance discontinuity.

The source figure is the stacked-strip parallel-plate transmission line geometry, despite its use of the word coplanar. Gauss's law gives $C={ϵ}_0{ϵ}_{r}a/d$. Opposite surface currents give magnetic field $B={\mu }_{0}I/a$ between the strips by Ampère's law; the magnetic flux per unit length is $Bd$, hence $L=Bd/I={\mu }_{0}d/a$. ThereforeNo numerical $a/d$ is given; the impedance is appropriately left in terms of that ratio. The line is taken to be nonmagnetic and lossless.

Increasing the gap by $\alpha$ changes $L$ to $\alpha L$ and $C$ to $C/\alpha$, so $Z_2=\alpha Z_1$ while $v$ is unchanged. voltage and current continuity at the step giveConsequently the voltage and energy-flux transmission coefficients areHere amplitudes are peak voltage amplitudes, with mean power $|V{|}^2/(2Z)$. The reciprocal gaps have $r_V(1/\alpha )=-r_V(\alpha )$: equal reflected energy but opposite voltage phase. A voltage transmission coefficient above one does not imply energy gain.

For a finite impedance section of a transmission line, put $\ell =l_2-l_1$ and $\delta =\omega \ell /v$. Multiple reflections inside the altered section interfere. Summing their geometric series, relative to the first boundary,Transmission is unity at $\delta =n\pi$ and minimal at $\delta =(n+1/2)\pi$, with minima $4{\alpha }^2/(1+{\alpha }^2{)}^2$. Resonances are separated by $\Delta f=v/(2\ell )$; the long-wavelength limit also transmits fully. Matching the far termination removes end echoes, not the two internal reflections.

Distributed line parameters. The geometry is the wide parallel-plate transmission line described in the question, with absolute permittivity $\epsilon =ϵ{\epsilon }_0$. A length $dx$ has charge $CVdx$ and field $E=V/d$, givingThe opposed plate currents have sheet density $I/a$ and confine the leading magnetic field $H=I/a$ between the plates. The magnetic energy per unit length is ${\mu }_0{H}^{2}ad/2=L{I}^2/2$, soHere $C$ and $L$ are per unit length, in $\mathrm{F}{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}$ and $\mathrm{H}{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}$, not lumped component values. Internal conductor fields and edge corrections are neglected.

Voltage and current evolution. The current entering a short length minus that leaving it is the rate of increase of its plate charge:The voltage drop across that length is its inductive drop, $V(x)-V(x+dx)=Ldx{\partial }_{t}I$. Dividing by $dx$ gives the lossless Telegrapher's equations,

Propagation speed. Differentiate these equations once more and eliminate the other variable:The wave equation speed is

Travelling-wave impedance. For a forward wave $V=F(t-x/v)$, take $I=V/Z_0$. Substitution into ${\partial }_{x}I+C{\partial }_{t}V=0$ gives $1/(v{Z}_0)=C$, hence the characteristic impedanceThe backward-wave current has the opposite sign relative to its voltage; the fixed ratio above applies to one travelling direction.

Matching the antenna. The voltage reflection coefficient is $\Gamma =(Z_{\mathrm{load}}-Z_0)/(Z_{\mathrm{load}}+Z_0)$. No reflection requires $Z_0=5\Omega$. With $a=0.020\mathrm{m}$, $ϵ=1.5$, and $\sqrt{{\mu }_0/{\epsilon }_0}\simeq 376.7\Omega$,The resulting $d/a\simeq 0.016$ is consistent with the wide-plate approximation.

Both transverse forces. The matched transverse electromagnetic mode has electric attraction and magnetic repulsion. For time-averaged power $P=100\mathrm{kW}$,The force on one plate excludes its own field. Thus the average electric attraction and magnetic repulsion per unit length are respectivelyThe electric and magnetic pressure cancellation in a matched TEM line follows directly from $V_{\mathrm{rms}}=Z_0{I}_{\mathrm{rms}}$:The equality also holds instantaneously for a single travelling wave. Quoting either $0.628\mathrm{N}{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}$ alone would omit the opposing contribution. This is the ideal electromagnetic force in the stated lossless uniform-dielectric model; a standing wave would not generally have the same cancellation.