If with a unit in a ring, then lies in the principal ideal generated by . This gives . Since has a multiplicative inverse, , giving the reverse inclusion. Therefore
Thus associate elements always generate the same principal ideal; the associator ring condition asks whether equality of these ideals also forces the generators to differ by a unit.
Suppose is an integral domain and . If , then , so and .
Otherwise membership in the equal principal ideals supplies with and . Substituting gives , or . There are no nonzero zero divisors in an integral domain, and , so . Hence is a unit with inverse , and makes and associate elements. We have proved
The ideal correspondence theorem identifies the ideals of with the ideals of containing . The possible positive generators divide , giving exactly
The units are and . The generators of the three displayed ideals are, respectively,
Within the last pair, multiplication by the unit exchanges the generators. The other two sets are singletons, whose members are associate elements to themselves by multiplication by . Thus equal principal ideals always have associate generators: this is an associator ring.
However, and , so is a nonzero zero divisor. Therefore
For two factors, the source's is the direct product of rings with componentwise operations. Its principal ideals satisfy
One inclusion follows by projection to the factors. For the reverse inclusion, multiplication by and puts and in the generated ideal; taking ideal combinations separately produces every pair in .
Suppose and generate the same principal ideal. Projecting to the factors gives for . Since each factor is an associator ring, there are units with . The pair is a unit of the direct product of rings, with inverse , and
Hence
Repeating this argument proves the same assertion for every finite direct product of rings.
Put . A principal ideal domain is a unique factorization domain, so every nonzero element of this quotient ring can be written
Indeed, remove the largest power of the prime element from a representative that is not divisible by . Since and have greatest common divisor up to a unit, Bézout's identity in the principal ideal domain gives . Thus is a unit in .
Consequently every nonzero principal ideal in is generated by one of . Include the zero ideal by assigning it exponent . These ideals are distinct: their inverse images in are , and equality of two different powers would, by cancellation in the integral domain, make the nonunit a unit.
Now suppose . If this is the zero ideal, both generators are zero and are associate elements. Otherwise their exponents agree, so write
with both units. Then
and the multiplier is a unit. Thus
The exponent detects the principal ideal, while its remaining factor is invertible; this is why zero divisors cause no obstruction here.
By the first isomorphism theorem for rings, the given surjection identifies with . Since is a principal ideal domain, write .
If , the quotient ring is , an integral domain, so part (a)(ii) applies. If is a unit, the quotient ring is the zero ring; its unique element is associate to itself by multiplication by its identity, so it too is an associator ring.
In the remaining case, unique factorization gives
where is a unit, the are pairwise nonassociate prime elements, and . The principal ideals are pairwise comaximal: different prime factors have greatest common divisor , and Bézout's identity gives a linear combination equal to . The Chinese remainder theorem therefore gives a ring isomorphism
Every factor is an associator ring by part (c), and their finite direct product of rings is an associator ring by part (b). A ring isomorphism preserves units and principal ideals, so the property transfers to . Hence

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.