First fix distinct and let . A negative-degree divisor has no sections: if , then is an effective divisor of degree , since a principal divisor has degree zero, so cannot be negative. As and , the Riemann-Roch theorem therefore gives
Now choose distinct outside the support of , and put . A function with the required zeros and poles must be a nonzero element of . Conversely, if , then is an effective divisor of degree zero, hence is zero. It follows that , giving precisely the required simple zeros and simple poles, with no others. Thus the existence question is exactly whether .
Take a basis of the Riemann-Roch space . Evaluation at the defines the linear mapwhose kernel is . The evaluation criterion for a prescribed principal divisor becomesThe crucial point is that this determinant does not vanish identically; a count of unknowns and equations alone would not prove this.
To verify it, begin with , of dimension . Whenever , choose a nonzero . Its zeros are finite. Choose outside those zeros, the support of and the previously chosen points. Evaluation at is then a nonzero linear functional on , soAfter steps, . Thus there exists a tuple of distinct points with .
The entries of this determinant vary holomorphically away from the , and are rational functions on the nonsingular projective curve. Its vanishing is therefore a proper closed exceptional locus on this configuration space; its complement is open and dense in the Zariski topology. For a generic choice of the , is invertible andThis holds for every fixed tuple of distinct , which proves the assertion for generic choices of both sets of points. At , it is especially transparent: , so no nonzero member can vanish at a distinct .
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.