The strict inequality means . Taking gives , soFor the other expression, if then and its P-adic valuation is zero. If , then has P-adic valuation exactly one. It can never have valuation greater than two. Thus no such integer exists for the second strict inequality.
In the P-adic numbers, converges to . ConsequentlySince , the digits one and two are both between zero and , so no carrying is required. These are its p-adic digits, with the unique negative-power digit at exponent minus one.
No prime works. The P-adic valuation induces a well-defined homomorphismThe class of maps to one, whereas the class of maps to zero. They therefore cannot be equal. Equivalently, cannot be a th power because its valuation is not divisible by .
Choose a nonzero integer with . By the Chinese remainder theorem, choose satisfying and . Put . ThenThis proves the requested simultaneous approximation, even when the rational targets have denominators divisible by either prime.
A rational sequence converging to zero at every standard absolute value is:Its ordinary absolute value is at most , hence tends to zero. For a fixed prime and all sufficiently large , the denominator is congruent to one modulo , so . Therefore for each prime as well. The assertion concerns each fixed prime separately, rather than uniform convergence over all primes.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.