Write , , and let the detuning from the rotating perturbation be
Substitute into the linear response in action-angle variables, then set :
At exact resonance the last quotient is interpreted by its continuous limit . Inserting this response in c gives
Pair with . Because , , and , the imaginary cosine terms cancel. The finite-time torque is
This is a leading, second-order response in the perturbation amplitude.
For the long-time limit, assume a continuum of occupied action variables, sufficiently smooth integrable weights, convergent harmonic sums, and regular resonance surfaces wherever a contributing surface intersects the distribution. Assume also that the perturbation is weak enough to neglect nonlinear trapping and secular changes in , and that the prescribed stellar bar pattern and its coefficients stay fixed. Then phase mixing removes nonresonant transients in the integrated response. The relevant long-time resonance kernel is the distributional convergence
It is not a pointwise limit: at the kernel equals . To justify its use under the integral over action variables, resolve the integral into detuning surfaces; the coarea formula gives
Smoothness and decay of this surface weight reduce the limit to the one-dimensional long-time resonance kernel. Equivalently, a causal convergence factor gives as .
Therefore the resonant torque from a rotating perturbation is
Only orbital resonances contribute to this steady integrated torque. The limit is a formal weak-perturbation limit, or an intermediate-time approximation after phase mixing but before substantial secular redistribution. It does not prove an unchanged halo can absorb angular momentum at this rate forever. A discrete set of orbital frequencies, singular resonance surfaces, or strong trapping can invalidate the stated steady limit.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.