For a Young diagram cell , its hook length is one plus the number of cells to its right and below. The hook-length formula is
Applying it to the two shapes gives
The shapes here require .
A hook tabloid remembers its first-row set and the ordered singleton entries below it. The proposed map keeps that first-row set and merges the remaining entries into one unordered row. Thus it is well-defined on tabloids. Permuting entries before merging gives the same tabloid as merging before permuting, so it is a module homomorphism. Every target tabloid is reached by putting its second-row entries, in any order, into the singleton rows. Therefore it is surjective.
For , the strictly dominating partitions of are exactly . Indeed dominance forces the first part to be at least , and the possibilities for the remaining sum give precisely those shapes or itself.
In characteristic zero, Maschke's theorem makes the permutation module semisimple, and Young's rule gives one copy of and only strictly dominating additional shapes. The trivial multiplicity is one, since a transitive permutation module has a one-dimensional invariant space. For the standard representation , Frobenius reciprocity identifies its multiplicity with the dimension of fixed vectors under the row stabilizer . In its realization , those fixed vectors have the form with , a two-dimensional space. Thus its multiplicity is two.
Finally . Subtracting the dimensions of one , one trivial module and two standard modules leaves , exactly one . Therefore
The additional multiplicities are respectively. If the printed weak summation index is read literally alongside its separate , then ; the total multiplicity of is one.
A tabloid is the row-equivalence class of a tableau filled bijectively with : order inside each row is forgotten, but the rows remain distinguished. The permutation module has these tabloids as an -basis, with permuting their entries. Let be the column stabilizer of and define
The Specht module is the submodule spanned by all polytabloids .
If a module homomorphism is nonzero on , it is nonzero on some spanning . Equivariance gives , so . The allowed criterion yields .
In characteristic zero, Maschke's theorem gives an equivariant projection . If , compose that projection with the isomorphism and the inclusion into . The preceding argument gives . Reversing the roles gives , so antisymmetry of dominance gives
For a map defined only on a Specht module in arbitrary characteristic, dominance need not hold. Take , , and . The first Specht module is the one-dimensional span of
The transposition fixes , so this is the trivial module. The one-row permutation module is also trivial and one-dimensional. Sending to its single tabloid is a nonzero equivariant map, yet . In this characteristic such a map need not extend to the surrounding permutation module; that is exactly where the earlier proof ceases to apply.
Let be the permutation character of . Young's rule gives , with integer Kostka multiplicities. This dominance-triangular system has diagonal entries one, so recursive subtraction expresses every irreducible character as an integer linear combination of permutation characters. The latter count fixed tabloids, proving that all are integers.
For a -cycle, the Murnaghan–Nakayama rule reduces to
where height is the number of occupied rows minus one, and is the degree of the remaining Specht character at the identity. In particular a full -cycle has character zero unless is a hook, in which case the value is .
There is more than one solution: the trivial representation has character everywhere and the sign representation has character everywhere. Thus
In fact they are the only ones. The full-cycle formula in the preceding discussion forces any candidate to be a hook . For , the standard character is the number of fixed points minus one, so it vanishes on cycle type ; its sign twist does too. For , the hook representation is the exterior square of the standard representation and has character . At cycle type both standard-character values are one, so this character is zero. Its sign twist also vanishes there. Only remain.
Irreducible character orthogonality gives . Under the proposed vanishing condition, only the identity contributes, so
But is an integer dimension and is not a square. Thus no such partition exists.
The full-cycle formula says that precisely the nonhook shapes have zero value on a 6-cycle. These are .
Use the standard two-row permutation-character rule . A transposition has four fixed points, so . It fixes two-subsets, giving . It fixes three-subsets, giving .
Conjugating a partition tensors its character with the sign character. Hence the values on a transposition for the conjugate shapes are and . The shape is self-conjugate, so its character equals its own sign twist and is zero on every odd permutation. The complete candidate table is therefore:
ShapeValue on a transposition
Thus the unique answer is

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.