Make the implicit fixed-crack-geometry assumption explicit by writing , where is common to the compared specimens and includes the crack-size dependence needed for dimensional consistency. linear elasticity gives
The appropriate materials merit index is therefore , or its monotonically equivalent square root. This comparison holds crack geometry and the brittle-failure model fixed; changing crack sizes or yielding before fracture changes the selection problem.
The maximum recoverable elastic energy per initial volume is the area under the linear stress–strain curve up to failure:
Using gives , so maximize for the fixed geometry. has units of energy per crack area, while has energy per specimen volume; the geometric factor supplies the necessary inverse length. The cancellation of is why the strain-maximizing index from (a) is not appropriate here.
TODO: user-deferred biology. This printed subpart is intentionally deferred under the current nonbiology-only scope.
TODO: user-deferred biology. This printed subpart is intentionally deferred under the current nonbiology-only scope.
TODO: user-deferred biology. This printed subpart is intentionally deferred under the current nonbiology-only scope.
TODO: user-deferred biology. This printed subpart is intentionally deferred under the current nonbiology-only scope.
TODO: user-deferred biology. This printed subpart is intentionally deferred under the current nonbiology-only scope.
TODO: user-deferred biology. This printed subpart is intentionally deferred under the current nonbiology-only scope.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.