Let be a locally small category, let be a representable presheaf, and let . The Yoneda lemma gives a bijection, natural in and ,
For , define a natural transformation by
For , the functor composition law gives , proving naturality. Conversely, naturality of any along gives
Thus is determined by its displayed element, and proves that the constructions are inverse.
A natural transformation sends the element to , which corresponds to . A morphism induces ; precomposition by sends the element to . This proves naturality in both variables and completes the Yoneda lemma proof.
The Yoneda embedding sends to and to postcomposition . Apply the Yoneda lemma with :
The inverse sends precisely to , because its component at maps to . Hence the induced maps on all hom-sets are bijections. The Yoneda embedding is full and faithful.
An isomorphism gives a natural isomorphism by postcomposition, with inverse .
Conversely suppose is a natural isomorphism, with inverse . Since the Yoneda embedding is a full and faithful functor, there are unique and with and . Their composites satisfy
Faithfulness gives and . Thus
The naturality requirement ensures that all incoming morphisms are respected; unrelated componentwise bijections alone would not justify the conclusion.
Here a universal element means a pair , with , such that for every and every there is a unique morphism satisfying . Equivalently,
By the Yoneda lemma these component maps constitute a natural transformation . If is universal, every component is bijective, so this is a natural isomorphism and is a representable presheaf. Conversely a natural isomorphism takes to an element with exactly this property. In the category of elements of the contravariant functor , is a terminal object: every has a unique arrow to it.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.