Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge / 2001 / iii / Paper 50 / 4 / b

Integrate the initial Cole-Hopf transformation and choose a continuous positive normalization:Split the heat kernel convolution at zero, and complete the square in the positive half-line contribution. DefineThe resulting heat equation solution isDifferentiating the moving endpoints gives ${\partial }_{\theta }{I}_{-}=-e^{-{\theta }^2/(4ϵZ)}$ and $E{\partial }_{\theta }{I}_{+}=e^{-{\theta }^2/(4ϵZ)}$. These terms cancel. Hence ${\psi }_{\theta }=(4\pi ϵZ{)}^{-1/2}UE{I}_{+}/(2ϵ)$, and the viscous Burgers step solution with negative flux isThe lower limit of $I_{-}$ is $\theta$, as printed in the original PDF. The converted TeX's $-\theta$ does not give the correct convolution or endpoint cancellation.

For the vanishing-viscosity limit, the conservative flux is $F(q)=-q^2/2$ and the characteristic speed is $F^{\prime }(q)=-q$. If $U>0$, the characteristics from the right move left and collide with those on the left. The Rankine-Hugoniot condition gives shock speed $[F]/[q]=-U/2$. ThusThe viscous transition has width $O(ϵ/U)$, and its centre value is exactly $U/2$ by the midpoint symmetry of a viscous Burgers step.

If $U<0$, the right characteristics move right and separate from the left ones. The limit is a rarefaction wave,This follows either from the Burgers Riemann problem with negative flux or the large-argument Gaussian-tail asymptotics of the exact formula. The two signs therefore give a shock and a spreading rarefaction respectively, not two shocks.