The Feigenbaum period-doubling map is quadratic-critical at zero: and . Differentiating the renormalization equation once gives . Differentiate again and set :
Cancellation of the nonzero second derivative therefore gives
The quadratic critical-point property matters. The normalization and functional equation alone, without specifying the Feigenbaum solution class, would not justify cancelling .
Use the geometric properties of the Feigenbaum geometric potential: for some constants ,
Here means variation between sequences agreeing in their first symbols. In particular . These are the standard bounds for the Feigenbaum geometric potential; the symbolic potential is not the singular expression at a quadratic critical point.
First allow all spins and use a fixed remote tail , writing for the weighted partition function. In a concatenated block of lengths and , replacing the history before the second block by changes its energy by at most : the th summand has the same first symbols, so its difference is at most . Therefore
For , the almost-additive partition-function limit follows explicitly: is subadditive and superadditive, so Fekete's lemma gives the same finite limit for both after division by . The finiteness follows from bounded and the words.
Changing the fixed remote tail also changes each full energy by at most . The question fixes the first spin to one and sums the remaining spins; its partition function is . The tail comparison and bounded first contribution show that its normalized logarithm has the same limit. Thus the requested exists and equals the topological pressure of .
For any , every length- energy lies between and , hence
Taking normalized logarithms and limits gives
So is Lipschitz continuous and strictly decreasing. For each finite , differentiation of the log-sum gives . Thus is convex, and passing to its finite pointwise limit proves that is convex too.
At zero weight the prescribed sum has terms, so . For the preceding bounds give . The function therefore becomes negative at sufficiently large positive . Continuity and strict decrease prove
Use zero-based indices ; the two index conventions in the printed question enumerate the same partition. Let be the sum of length powers over odd intervals and the sum over all intervals. For odd-address words, the given symbolic potential estimate has , with constants independent of . Raising these bounds to a fixed real power and reversing the order when necessary gives finite positive constants such that
Therefore . It remains to justify the even intervals, since the supplied estimate covers only half of the partition.
In the standard period-doubling partition, and . All odd-address intervals lie in the first image restrictive interval, a compact set away from the unique critical point zero. Hence there are uniform constants there. For an odd , its image is the next even interval, and the mean value theorem gives .
For the wraparound pair the image of the last interval is a subinterval of , not necessarily the whole of it. Iterating the renormalization identity gives
Thus , while . The image is the fixed fraction of the central interval. Combining this with the derivative bounds proves uniform comparability of the last odd interval and the central even interval as well. This establishes the odd-even comparison for Feigenbaum partition lengths for every pair, including wraparound.
Consequently, for each fixed real , the even sum is bounded above and below by constant multiples of . The same is true of , so
Finally take . Strict decrease gives , so this length-power sum tends to zero exponentially. The cover mesh also tends to zero: negative bounded and the odd-interval estimate give on odd intervals, and the odd-even comparison transfers this bound to all intervals. Since the intervals cover the Feigenbaum attractor, they are admissible arbitrarily fine covers in the definition of Hausdorff measure, and . Therefore the pressure upper bound for Hausdorff dimension yields
The covering argument supplies the requested upper bound; it does not assume a dimension equality or a lower bound not proved here.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.