Let be the projection and the section with image . For the canonical one-form on a cotangent bundle,Since , evaluation on a tangent vector givesUse the same position-first standard symplectic form as before, . Pullback commutes with the exterior derivative, soThe graph of a differential one-form is an embedded submanifold, because its projection is the inverse of the section on the graph. Its dimension is , half that of . Therefore the vanishing of the pulled-back symplectic form is exactly the Lagrangian submanifold condition, andThis proves that the graph of a closed one-form is Lagrangian using the intrinsic one-form rather than a coordinate guess.
The cotangent fiber translation is a smooth diffeomorphism with inverse , and . For a tangent vector at , the intrinsic definition of the canonical one-form on a cotangent bundle givesThus . Taking its exterior derivative with the fixed sign convention yieldsIf is a closed differential one-form, the last term vanishes, proving that is a symplectomorphism. In fact the converse holds too: the pullback by the zero section shows that implies .
Write the exact differential form as for a smooth real-valued function on . On take the Hamiltonian function . With and , the Hamiltonian vector field isIts complete flow is explicit:The base point stays fixed, so this flow exists for all real , even if is unbounded on a noncompact base. Its time-one map is exactly , proving that the cotangent fiber translation is a Hamiltonian diffeomorphism in the unrestricted complete-flow group.
This construction also justifies the hint for this family, without treating exactness as a general substitute for a Hamiltonian isotopy. For any Hamiltonian isotopy on this cotangent bundle, Cartan's magic formula, and giveIntegrating proves that is exact. For the present translation this difference is , which is exact if and only if is exact: one direction is pullback of , and the other is pullback by the zero section. Necessity therefore follows from the differential identity, while sufficiency follows from the complete flow just constructed.
Compact support is a separate issue. If is nonzero at some , the map moves every point of the entire unbounded fiber over , so it is not a member of the compactly supported Hamiltonian diffeomorphism group. For example , gives . Thus the claim about this global translation uses the full Hamiltonian group, not ; its flow can be cut off to agree on a prescribed compact swept set, but such a cutoff does not give the same map on the entire cotangent bundle.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.