Name the upper objects and the lower objects , so the morphisms are , , , , , , and . The commutative diagram gives and .
Take and with . The right pullback in a category gives a unique with and . The left pullback in a category then gives a unique with and . It follows that , giving the required factorization through the outside rectangle. Any other factorization has the same middle morphism by uniqueness in the right pullback in a category, and therefore is the same by uniqueness in the left pullback in a category. The outside rectangle is a pullback.
Keep the notation of the preceding part. For and satisfying , we have . The outside pullback in a category gives a unique with and . Moreover . The morphisms thus have the same composites with and . Uniqueness in the right pullback in a category gives . Any factorization through the left square also factors through the outside rectangle, so it is unique there. The left square is a pullback. Together these two arguments prove the pullback pasting lemma.
Here is a precise base change of a pullback square statement. Suppose is a pullback in a category and is a morphism. Assume the pullbacks in a categoryexist, where is the common composite. The induced square with vertices is a pullback in a category; equivalently,Indeed, compatible morphisms and give morphisms , , and a common , with the composites of to both equal to . The original pullback in a category gives a unique morphism with projections . Its composite to is , so the defining pullback in a category for gives a unique morphism above . Its maps to and are the prescribed ones by uniqueness in those pullbacks in a category. Conversely, these projections recover , so every possible factorization is the same. This proves the universal property without requiring arbitrary categorical limits in the ambient category.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.