We prove the equivalence by a cycle of implications. First assume closedness and boundedness. Given a sequence in , boundedness puts each coordinate in a fixed closed bounded real interval. Apply the one-dimensional Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem to its first coordinate to extract a convergent subsequence, then apply it to the second coordinate of that subsequence, and continue through the finitely many coordinates. The final subsequence converges coordinatewise to some . It also converges in the Euclidean norm, since the sum of the squares of its finitely many coordinate differences tends to zero. Since is a closed set, this limit belongs to . Thus closedness and boundedness imply the required subsequence property. No higher-dimensional compactness theorem has been assumed.
Assume the subsequence property, and let be a continuous function. If were unbounded, for each positive integer we could choose with . There is a subsequence with . By continuity, , so that real sequence is bounded. But , a contradiction. Hence every continuous real-valued function on is bounded. This is the bounded-function consequence of sequential compactness.
Assume every continuous function is bounded. The Euclidean norm function is continuous, so its boundedness proves that is a bounded set.
If were not a closed set, there would be . Choose with . The function is continuous everywhere on , because its denominator is nonzero there. Yet , contradicting the hypothesis. Thus is closed. Together with the two previous implications this proves all three conditions are equivalent. The empty set satisfies all three conditions trivially. This is the Euclidean case of the bounded-continuous-function characterization of compact metric spaces.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.