Let , and . Along a smooth solution, . The exact difference contains only odd derivatives. Matching terms through degree four therefore requires
The first two conditions give , which also implies . With , the remaining equations are and . Hence
The fifth spatial moment is . After dividing the exact-minus-scheme residual by , its first possible nonzero term is
This is the fourth-order two-step advection stencil. Thus the normalized local truncation error is at fixed positive Courant number, as required. At or the formula translates the physical advection branch exactly, but consistency of a numerical method alone does not decide stability of all two-level perturbations.
Fourier transform on the infinite spatial lattice gives
with polynomial roots . When is uniformly less than one, the polynomial roots have modulus one and a uniform positive separation. Diagonalizing the companion matrix then bounds all its powers independently of and . Parseval's identity proves stability in the discrete norm for arbitrary square-summable starting perturbations at both levels.
At the coefficients give
Consequently is stable.
At ,
The growing polynomial root at this phase has modulus
To turn this into a Cauchy problem linear instability proof, rather than rely on a plane wave of infinite norm, choose a small interval around on which the growing polynomial root has modulus at least . Choose an initial Fourier transform amplitude that is a nonzero square-integrable function supported there, and set the level-one amplitude equal to that polynomial root times the level-zero amplitude. The recurrence then multiplies by the same growing polynomial root at every step on the support. Parseval identity gives , whereas both initial norms are bounded independently of . Real data can be obtained by adding the conjugate interval around . Since tends to infinity at fixed , is unstable.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.