Let be probability density per unit solid angle, with and isotropic initial condition . In still fluid, bottom-heavy spherical-cell orientation dynamics gives . Adding isotropic rotational diffusion gives the gyrotactic orientation Fokker-Planck equation
The derivatives are tangential to the unit sphere. Rotational symmetry about is preserved by both the equation and the initial condition, so depends only on . Since , the polar probability flux is . Expanding yields
Regular solutions have no probability flux through the poles. The mean swimming velocity is , with only a vertical component by symmetry.
For , the steady polar flux satisfies . Regularity at both poles makes its integration constant zero. Thus
Normalize with :
The zero-flow steady gyrotactic orientation distribution is therefore
Differentiating the logarithm of its normalization integral gives the Langevin function mean
As , and the mean tends to zero; as , the distribution concentrates at the upward pole and the mean tends to . At zero diffusivity the pole-concentrated steady state is a probability measure, not a regular density of this formula.
With and , the Fokker-Planck equation becomes the probability-transport equation
Its characteristic obeys . Writing and gives
Conservation of orientation probability pushes the initially uniform density forward by this Jacobian. Thus
Since with , the deterministic alignment of an initially isotropic orientation distribution is
At , and ; the characteristic Jacobian preserves at every finite time. Its reciprocal is quadratic in , as in the suggested substitution.
To compute the mean, integrate explicitly:
Consequently
The apparent singularity at is removable: , so the initial mean is zero. At late times,
Except for the exactly downward initial orientation, which has zero probability in the initial smooth distribution, every characteristic aligns upward. The infinite-time orientation distribution is a point mass at the upward pole.
From part (i), the steady mean has . Hence gives . Part (ii) gives the same mean as . Thus
Both limiting distributions concentrate weakly at the upward pole. A common limiting mean does not identify their finite-time distributions or the order in which the limits are taken.
Time scales must be compared at a specified accuracy. The exact deterministic solution approaches the limiting mean with deficit : its alignment scale is , with exponential late scale . For weak but nonzero diffusion, linearize about the upward direction using the two transverse tilt components . They obey the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process
The stationary angular variance is , and nearby axisymmetric variance perturbations decay on to leading weak-noise order. This is weak-noise relaxation of gyrotactic alignment: the aligning torque, not the pure rotational-diffusion time , controls the weak-noise alignment rate.
Nevertheless the full relaxation times are not identical. Finite diffusion leaves mean deficit approximately , whereas deterministic alignment has no such floor. Starting from isotropy, reducing the transient deficit to that tiny floor requires , or
with smaller logarithmic corrections. The two limits have the same mean and the same order- weak-noise alignment mechanism, but not identical transients or accuracy-dependent settling times. No finite time achieves the exact deterministic point-mass limit; positive diffusion never gives that exact point mass at all.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.