Use pi-normalized kinematic plume fluxes: physical volume, momentum and buoyancy fluxes are , and . For a top-hat plume model in a homogeneous ambient, constant entrainment coefficient gives
Eliminating height between the first two equations yields . Hence the plume flux-balance invariant is . Pure plume balance means that this invariant vanishes, including at a finite-volume source:
It does not mean that and must individually be zero. The balanced solution has a plume virtual origin below the physical source:
where . For given nonzero source fluxes, the displayed balance is a compatibility condition; they cannot be chosen independently and still describe an exactly balanced source.
Let be the filling-box first front, with . Below it the original fluid has not yet been through the plume. In the filling box model, the turbulent plume adjusts rapidly and occupies a negligible fraction of the room's area. A point source with negligible source volume flux supplies . All its volume crossing the front grows the processed region, so volume conservation gives
Put . Integrating yields
The first front approaches the floor only as . A nonzero source volume flux would require an equal exhaust to keep the room volume fixed; it is treated in the following parts.
The balanced finite source has and . An ideal small opening exhausts the physical source volume . When , the opening is in the unprocessed lower region. Its outflow and the plume's entrainment both remove lower fluid, while all plume flux across the front enters the processed region. When , the opening exhausts processed fluid, reducing the net growth of that region by . Thus the finite-source filling-box front with a side opening obeys
The ideal exhaust switches fluid type as the front crosses its height. Above the opening the solution is , and it reaches at
Below the opening, the implicit solution is
The model assumes an effective point opening with one-way source-volume exhaust; a tall opening supporting simultaneous density-driven exchange would need additional boundary-flow equations.
If , the front enters the lower-opening branch before reaching the floor. Near ,
The final approach is exponential and the time integral in part (c) diverges logarithmically. Thus no finite floor-arrival time exists. If the opening is at , the first branch applies until arrival and has a finite nonzero downward speed at the floor. The arrival time is
Hence finite-time floor arrival occurs only for a floor opening, within the stated finite-source model. In the point-source limit , and this arrival time diverges, recovering part (b).
Assume both openings have positive area, no imposed wind pressure, a light buoyant plume, and a Boussinesq approximation. Write and for physical source volume and buoyancy flux. Include discharge coefficients ; if ideal openings are intended, set these to one. In a steady two-layer displacement ventilation state with interface height , let the floor inflow be and roof outflow . Volume and buoyancy balances give
The hydrostatic pressure head across the warm upper layer must equal the two opening losses:
A positive unprocessed lower layer needs . At the boundary where this layer disappears, , the plume can entrain no lower ambient fluid, so , and . The critical condition is therefore .
To determine the inequality, consider a fully processed room. Its steady reduced gravity is . If is the interior-to-exterior pressure difference at the floor, source-volume blocking of fresh floor inflow requires . Both openings then exhaust, with
The right-hand side is increasing in and has its minimum at zero. Consequently a fully processed state exists exactly when
This is source-volume blocking of displacement ventilation. At equality floor inflow vanishes; above it the floor can also exhaust and no fresh lower-layer supply is needed. Below it, the floor pressure must be negative, admitting fresh fluid and supporting a positive lower layer. In fact the steady interface equation has a unique positive root: its loss side increases with because increases, while its buoyancy-head side decreases.
The floor-opening area affects the positive-interface state and its approach, but drops out of the blocking threshold because floor flux is zero at the threshold. Equal splitting of pressure head, or using a source-free effective opening area at this transition, would miss this distinction. If the floor opening is sealed, the fresh-inflow argument no longer applies: a finite source with only roof exhaust instead cycles the room asymptotically as in the ceiling-opening case of part (c).

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.