There is a genuine normalization error in the printed function. Write independently, and . The internal sum produces a scalar; taking its mean does not divide by . The literal returned value is therefore
Since and , its expectation is
It does not estimate unbiasedly unless , and no fixed control variate coefficient removes this bias. In particular the actual call with returns
This is an instance of summing before taking a mean changes Monte Carlo normalization.
The intended corrected method replaces the sum by a sample mean:
It uses symmetry to write the tail as , then Monte Carlo integration on a bounded interval, and finally a mean-zero control variate. For the intended estimator is , whose summands are smooth and bounded. Keeping the average normalization, and
Differentiating this quadratic gives the Cauchy tail control variate on a bounded interval coefficient
Here , , so . Also
Consequently
The negative sign is consistent with decreasing and increasing. One may estimate the covariance and variance using a separate pilot sample and fix the resulting coefficient for a fresh sample. This coefficient minimizes the literal function's variance as well, but its missing factor of still leaves the bias above.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.