Substitute the power series and compare coefficients. The constant coefficient gives . For , the coefficient of gives
Thus , while the equation places no restriction on . For ,
The power series therefore sums to
Renaming the two arbitrary constants gives .
Both functions solve the equation by direct substitution. Their Wronskian, in the order , is , which is nonzero for . Hence they give the full two-dimensional solution space on either interval away from the singular point. Both are entire, and the displayed formula also gives every twice continuously differentiable solution through zero: matching and fixes the same on the two sides.
For two solutions , define their Wronskian by
Differentiation and substitution of the second-order linear differential equation give
This proves the Abel identity and hence
On an interval where the known solution does not vanish,
Integrating gives the reduction of order formula
Choosing the normalization makes the Wronskian nonzero, so this solution is linearly independent of . To verify it really solves the equation, write . Its equation reduces to
the integrand gives , which satisfies this equation on differentiation. Adding an integration constant only adds a multiple of . The formula is local where ; at a zero of with regular coefficients, the actual solution can be continued by initial-value existence and uniqueness, even if its integral representation has an apparent singularity.
Multiply the equation by to obtain . The leading terms after a Frobenius method trial are
the term involving first appears at order . The indicial equation is therefore
To obtain the first correction to a regular singular solution by reduction of order, start from the assumed solution and use the Abel identity:
We work initially on near zero; since is a positive integer, the resulting expansion is an ordinary power series. Also , so the reduction of order integral has integrand
Choose its integration constant to be zero, eliminating an added multiple of . Integrating and multiplying by gives
With the requested normalized answer is
Its nonzero Wronskian makes it independent of . The existence of the asserted also forces ; there is no need to introduce into the normalized second coefficient.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.