For the inverse-square potential , the central force is . The transverse component of acceleration in polar coordinates is therefore zero:
Thus ; for unit mass it is the signed angular momentum perpendicular to the orbital plane. The radial component gives
Consequently
This is the mechanical energy, since the full kinetic energy is and .
For and , the effective potential goes to as and to zero from below as . Its derivative is , so it decreases up to and then increases. Its zero and minimum are
For , is positive and strictly decreasing, with limits at zero and at infinity. It has no minimum at a finite positive radius.
Figure 1.
Attractive and repulsive inverse-square effective potentials and bounded-orbit turning points
. Details.
If , the centrifugal term disappears. For the graph is instead , increasing from to without a minimum; for it remains positive and decreasing. The bounded-orbit calculation below uses the stipulated , which excludes this radial collision case.
The radial energy equation is , so motion requires . For and , the effective potential minimum and its limiting value zero at infinity imply
At the lower endpoint the particle stays at , giving a circular orbit. Strictly between that endpoint and zero, two positive turning points confine the radial motion. For below the minimum there is no allowed motion, while does not give a radially bounded orbit.
Write and . At each turning point , so
The smaller and larger roots give the periapsis distance and apoapsis distance:
They coincide for the circular orbit. Their sum and product are
The speed satisfies , which decreases strictly with because . Thus its maximum is at the periapsis and its minimum at the apoapsis. At either endpoint the radial velocity vanishes, so . Therefore the apsidal speed sum for an attractive inverse-square orbit is
Hence . Individually, and , also valid when the orbit is circular.
At infinity the potential energy tends to zero, so the conserved mechanical energy is . The impact parameter is the perpendicular distance from the origin to the incoming asymptotic line. Conservation of angular momentum gives .
For , a turning point of the radial motion satisfies
Only the positive root is physical, giving
For this reduces to the straight-line closest distance .
For nonzero , put . If , the numerator is , so
If , rationalize the numerator instead:
Thus the requested leading distances are
Repulsion gives a finite barrier even for zero impact parameter; attraction allows much closer passage. At , the attractive formula has the limiting closest distance zero, corresponding to collision with the singular centre rather than a positive turning point.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.