The finite representation type of a quiver condition means there are only finitely many isomorphism classes of indecomposable finite-dimensional -modules. Equivalently, every finite-dimensional module is a direct sum of members of a finite list of indecomposables.
For the case, we give the reflection argument underlying the Gabriel theorem, rather than using its conclusion as the proof. Since the underlying graph is a tree, every orientation is acyclic. At a sink , writefor the sum of the incoming arrow maps. If an indecomposable is not the simple , then is surjective: a nonzero complementary subspace to its image at the sink would be a direct summand supported only at . The Bernstein–Gelfand–Ponomarev reflection functor reverses the arrows and replaces by , with reversed maps the component projections. The source reflection replaces that kernel by the cokernel of its inclusion into , recovering . The inclusion is injective, so the reflected representation has no direct summand at the new source. If it decomposed, applying the inverse would decompose . Thus reflection preserves indecomposability except that it annihilates .
On a dimension vector of a quiver representation, it acts by the integral simple reflectionLet . These reflections preserve the positive-definite quadratic form . Positivity can be checked without a classification theorem: label the graph by the chain and attach vertex to . The leading principal minors are , all positive.
Choose a topological ordering so arrows point from smaller to larger indices. Reflect successively at sinks . This restores the orientation after one full cycle. The transformation of dimension vectors is the Coxeter element . If has diagonal entries one and entry above the diagonal at an arrow, direct multiplication of the reflection matrices givesThus has no fixed vector. It is an integral isometry of a positive definite form, so it has finite order : the image of each lattice basis vector lies in a finite set of vectors of the same norm, giving only finitely many possible isometries. Since and is invertible,If an indecomposable survived all reflection cycles, its dimension vectors would all be nonzero and componentwise nonnegative, contradicting their zero sum. Therefore it reaches a simple at one of the finitely many reflection steps and is then annihilated. Applying the inverse reflections uniquely reconstructs it from that simple. There are at most such stopping positions, provingThis supplies the requested finite-type proof sketch.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.