Take to be the vector of and absorb into . Its diagonal entry is , each axial-neighbour entry is and each diagonal-neighbour entry is . Since these weights agree in both directions, is a symmetric matrix.
Extend a grid vector by zero to the whole integer lattice. Let contain unordered axial-neighbour pairs and unordered diagonal-neighbour pairs. Only finitely many differences involving nonzero values contribute. Each lattice vertex has total neighbour weight , so expanding the squared differences gives
It is nonpositive. If it vanishes, every axial difference vanishes. The axial lattice is connected and is zero outside the finite interior square, forcing . Thus for every nonzero : .
Reordering the grid replaces by for a permutation matrix . This preserves symmetry and the sign of the quadratic form, proving the assertion for any ordering. Multiplying the whole system by merely rescales by a positive number and has the same conclusions.
Let be the diagonal part of . The weighted Jacobi method is
Equivalently it is . In grid form, all neighbours on the right are taken from the old iterate:
The boundary values stay zero at every step. The iteration matrix is .
For , the Jacobi method iteration matrix has zero diagonal, nonnegative axial entries , and diagonal-neighbour entries . Its row sums are at most one; they are strictly below one at grid points next to the Dirichlet boundary. Its graph is connected by the positive axial entries.
To prove the strict spectral radius bound, let with and choose a component of maximum magnitude . Then
so . If equality held, every positive-weight neighbour of a maximal component would also have modulus , and that row would have sum one. Propagating along axial edges reaches a boundary-adjacent row, whose sum is strictly less than one, a contradiction. This also covers a one-point interior grid, for which . Hence
The standard convergence theorem for a stationary linear iteration says it converges from every initial vector exactly when its iteration matrix has spectral radius below one. Since is invertible by (i), the error satisfies and
Weak row diagonal dominance alone would not prove convergence; the connection to a strictly deficient boundary row supplies the required strictness.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.