Fix and put , . Then . The bounded monotone sequence theorem gives a limit . If , it lies in the domain, where continuity allows passage to the limit in the recurrence: . That is a fixed point, contrary to . Hence . Continuity is used at a possible positive limiting point, not at the excluded endpoint zero.
No: pointwise convergence need not be uniform convergence. The continuous function maps into itself and is strictly below the identity. Its iteration of a map givesFor every finite , these values tend to as , so . With , choosing gives . Thus no single iterate works for every starting point, although each fixed starting point tends to zero.
Use the discontinuous exampleIn both pieces . For , the image stays strictly above , and induction givesThis positive limiting point is not a fixed point, since . The discontinuity is precisely why the limit cannot be passed through . Therefore the pointwise zero-limit conclusion can fail without continuity.
No: there need not be even one orbit tending to zero. Partition the domain into the disjoint intervalsand, for the unique with , defineThe left endpoint is strictly below , so . Moreover and , so remains in the same interval. For every iterate,Every starting point belongs to some finite-index interval, so this proves the claim for all . The open left endpoints matter: an orbit approaches a boundary but never crosses it. This is discontinuous trapping of decreasing iterates, not a violation of the bounded monotone sequence theorem; each orbit does converge, just to a positive value where continuity fails.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.