The Noether normalization lemma is valid over every field , including finite fields: a nonzero finitely generated algebra contains elements with algebraic independence over such that is finite as a module over the polynomial ring . We prove it without an infinite-field hypothesis.
Write and induct on . If the generators have algebraic independence, they already give a polynomial ring and the assertion is immediate. Otherwise choose a nonzero relation . Choose an integer larger than every exponent in the monomials of , and setIn , the largest power of has a nonzero coefficient in . Indeed, a monomial with exponents contributes top weight . These weights are distinct by uniqueness of base- expansion, so only one monomial contributes the highest power. After rescaling, the substituted relation is monic in .
Consequently is an integral element over , and is finite over . Apply the induction hypothesis to and compose the finite module extensions. This proves Noether normalization by weighted substitutions. The induction reaches , where . For an integral domain , taking fraction fields makes the resulting extension finite algebraic, so is the transcendence degree of . More generally : integral extensions preserve Krull dimension, and a polynomial algebra in variables has Krull dimension .
A useful bridge to the Hilbert Nullstellensatz is the Zariski lemma. If a field is a finitely generated algebra over , normalization makes it finite and integral over a polynomial ring . A subring over which a field is integral is a field: for nonzero , an integral equation for , multiplied by , expresses as an element of . Therefore must be a field. A polynomial ring in a positive number of variables is not a field, since a variable has no polynomial inverse. Hence and is a finite field extension. This proves the Zariski lemma.
Now let be an algebraically closed field. The Weak Hilbert Nullstellensatz says that every maximal ideal of is uniquely of the formTo prove it, the residue field is a field generated as a -algebra by the images of the variables. The Zariski lemma makes it finite algebraic over , and algebraic closedness makes it . Thus each has an image . The evaluation map has kernel the displayed ideal: subtracting the constant value of a polynomial expresses its difference as a combination of . That kernel is maximal and contained in , so equality holds. Conversely every evaluation kernel is maximal because its quotient is . Uniqueness follows from the variable images. Every proper ideal is contained in a maximal ideal, so it has a common zero; equivalently, an ideal with no common zero is the whole ring.
For an ideal , let be its common-zero set and let be all polynomials vanishing on that set. The Strong Hilbert Nullstellensatz statesThe inclusion follows because a field has no nonzero nilpotent elements. For the other inclusion, take vanishing on , with , and form the Rabinowitsch trick idealIt has no common zero: at a zero of the second generator has value one. The Weak Hilbert Nullstellensatz in variables gives . Hence a finite identity has the form , with . Substitute in the localization of a ring . Clearing the finitely many powers of occurring in denominators gives for some , so . The case is immediate. This completes all three proofs. The algebraically closed hypothesis belongs to the two forms of the Hilbert Nullstellensatz; it was not needed for the Noether normalization lemma or the Zariski lemma.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.