Assume the proposed device distinguishes the four displayed eigenstates, as an ideal rank-one projective measurement. This assumption matters: if all four had the same eigenvalue, the identity observable would admit that eigenbasis but its Lüders rule measurement would do nothing and could not signal. The printed eigenvectors alone do not exclude this degeneracy.
For the complete resolving measurement, let , , and be the four rank-one projectors. If the nonlocal outcome is ignored, the nonselective projective measurement channel is . Each listed state's local reduced density matrix is diagonal in , with expectation for either plus state and for either minus state. ConsequentlyCompute in its even and odd two-dimensional blocks: both have diagonal entries and off-diagonal entries . ThusandTo signal, prepare Alice in and Bob initially in . Bob encodes a bit by either doing nothing or applying a local Pauli Z gate, which changes his state to . Alice's input reduced density matrix is identical in both cases, but after the hypothetical instantaneous measurement her local expectation isThe two probabilities for Alice's outcome are , so their difference is . It is strictly positive for . Repeated trials let Alice infer Bob's bit while their operations are still spacelike, violating quantum no-signalling and relativistic causality. The relativistic causality constraint on an ideal nonlocal measurement therefore permits onlywithin the specified interval. The argument requires no rapid communication of the hypothetical nonlocal outcome: Alice reads her own changed local statistics. It rules out the full ideal instrument, not merely the later classical comparison of locally obtained records.
At the four eigenstates are the computational product basis, with irrelevant signs on two vectors. Alice and Bob measure their own system qubits in . These local projective measurements preserve each product eigenstate; their pair of records identifies the global outcome after local operations and classical communication.
At the four states are the Bell states. They are simultaneous eigenstates of the commuting Pauli operators and : have respective pairs . Their nonlocal parity measurements can be performed without directly distinguishing the local system spins.
Use the first shared Bell state pair to perform the entanglement-assisted nondemolition parity measurement of . Use the second shared pair for : both parties apply a local Hadamard gate to their system qubit, execute the same local system-to-meter CNOT gates and -meter measurements, then undo the Hadamard gates. This measures because . The two system parity projectors commute, since anticommutation at both sites cancels:Each is the corresponding rank-one Bell state projector. Every complete tuple of four local meter records has system Kraus operator for its two parities. Summing the four record tuples compatible with gives the ideal outcome map . The protocol is a Bell-state nondemolition measurement: an input Bell state is preserved, while an arbitrary input is projected onto the reported Bell state with the Born rule probability.
The local circuits need no adaptive communication between the laboratories, so both parties can finish inside the specified time window. Global identification of still requires later local operations and classical communication. This endpoint protocol respects quantum no-signalling, unlike the hypothetical intermediate-angle instrument in part (i).
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.