Let be the family of closed half-spaces containing . Certainly . To prove the reverse inclusion, exclude an arbitrary .
Suppose first that is nonempty. Its Euclidean projection onto a convex set exists: minimizing the continuous squared distance may be restricted to a sufficiently large closed ball, whose intersection with the closed set is compact. Put . For every , convexity puts in for . Minimality of givesThus the closed half-spacecontains , while excludes . Since every point outside is excluded by some member of ,This is the half-space representation of a closed convex set. If , every point can again be excluded by a containing half-space, so the intersection is empty. If , no proper half-space contains it and the empty intersection is, by convention, .
The Legendre-Fenchel transform and biconjugate areThe Fenchel-Moreau theorem says that every proper convex function which is lower semicontinuous equals its biconjugate. More generally, if a proper extended-real has an affine minorant, thenwhere the right side is the greatest lower semicontinuous convex minorant. This is biconjugation as closed convexification. The affine-minorant hypothesis ensures that the closed convexification is proper; an unqualified statement including arbitrary improper functions would need separate conventions.
Here are the essential proof steps. The Fenchel–Young inequality gives . Every term in the supremum defining is an affine minorant of , and conversely any affine minorant has . Thus is exactly the supremum of all affine minorants, hence is convex and lower semicontinuous.
Put . Its epigraph is the closed convex hull of the epigraph of . Applying the half-space representation of a closed convex set in recovers that epigraph from its containing half-spaces. A containing half-space writtenhas , since epigraphs extend upwards. If , it is precisely the epigraph inequality of an affine minorant, .
Vertical half-spaces with must also be accounted for. Choose one affine minorant of , which exists because is proper and closed: strictly separate from its epigraph for a finite domain point ; the separating coefficient of cannot be zero, since that would not distinguish points with the same . If a vertical containing inequality is , thenis still an affine minorant on the domain of . At a point violating the vertical inequality, these minorants tend to infinity as . Thus vertical domain restrictions are also recovered by the supremum of affine minorants.
Consequently equals that supremum. Every affine minorant of is below , while the epigraph of any affine minorant of contains its closed convex epigraph hull. Therefore and have the same affine minorants, completing . The theorem in the previous solution supplies the geometric separation step behind biconjugation.
Let . Maximizing a linear functional over this line segment occurs at an endpoint, soThis identifies as a support function. Its convex conjugate is the indicator functional : if , then for every , with equality at zero; if , strict separation and positive scaling of the separating vector make the supremum infinite.
For a convex function, equality in the Fenchel–Young inequality characterizes its subdifferential. HenceThis is support-function subgradients as exposed faces. In particular a maximizing really is a subgradient, since for every .
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.