For an affine variety , one construction defines as the functions which locally have the form , where are elements of the coordinate ring and does not vanish on the neighbourhood in question. Restrictions are restrictions of functions, and locality gives the sheaf axioms. In particularThe second formula identifies its local rings.
In the classical convention, an algebraic variety over is an irreducible ringed space with a sheaf of -valued functions, admitting a finite open cover by spaces isomorphic to affine varieties, and satisfying the separated variety condition that its diagonal is closed in . Its topology is Noetherian. One can instead allow reducible reduced varieties; the arguments below still work with the denominator-clearing version of the localization argument. A morphism of varieties is a continuous map whose pullback takes local regular functions to regular functions, equivalently a morphism of locally ringed -spaces. The maps on local rings are local because a function nonzero at the image point stays nonzero at the source point.
An affine variety supplies its own finite affine cover, is Noetherian, and is separated: its diagonal in is cut out by the differences of corresponding coordinates. A regular map between affine varieties pulls coordinate functions back to regular functions. It is continuous because the inverse image of any polynomial zero set is the zero set of the pulled-back regular functions; on affine charts such zero sets are closed. Pulling back a locally represented fraction gives a regular fraction wherever its denominator is nonzero. Hence a regular map is a morphism of varieties in this definition.
For a morphism which is an isomorphism over each member of an open cover of , every fibre contains exactly one point. Thus is bijective. Its inverse is continuous and regular on every , since there it is the given inverse of the local isomorphism. These inverses agree on overlaps, being inverses of the same map. They glue to a global inverse morphism of varieties. Therefore being an isomorphism is local on the target.
Let , and let be affine with coordinate ring . Given a -algebra homomorphism , choose a presentation . The maplands in because all the equations in become zero functions. Its coordinates are global regular functions, so it is a morphism on every affine chart of , and therefore globally. On a target neighbourhood where a fraction is defined its pullback is , proving that the induced map on global sections is exactly . This also proves independence of the chosen generators and uniqueness. This is the affine-target adjunction for varieties.
For , the natural map sends to that regular function. In the irreducible convention, if , is dense, so this map is injective: a global regular function vanishing there vanishes everywhere. Cover by finitely many affine charts . A section on restricts on to an element of . A common power clears all these finitely many denominators. The resulting regular sections on agree on the dense principal open in each overlap, hence agree there altogether and glue to a global section . Thus . If , both sides are the zero ring of sections on the empty open. ConsequentlyThis is localization of global sections on a principal open. For reduced reducible varieties, equality on a principal open instead means that a sufficiently large power of annihilates the difference; finitely many charts and overlap refinements allow one common extra power. The same denominator-clearing proof then gives the stated localization isomorphism without a density assumption.
Now suppose in and every is affine. Each is a finitely generated -algebra. Select finitely many generators, writing them as . Let be the -subalgebra generated by all , all , and all . It is finitely generated, andThe inclusion from left to right is immediate, while the chosen generators give the reverse inclusion. This construction does not assume that was finitely generated in advance.
The reduced algebra is the coordinate ring of an affine variety (irreducible when is). The map produces by the preceding construction. The sets cover , since their functions generate the unit ideal already in . Their inverse images are , and on them the map is the isomorphism corresponding to . The target-local argument above now provesThis is affineness from a unit-ideal principal affine cover. The printed sets are ; the missing index in the TeX aid is not a different hypothesis.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.